Table 3

Comparison of behavioral phenotypes expressed by Homer2AA/AA, GRM5R/R, and GRM5AA/AA mice

WT vs Homer2AA/AAWT vs GRM5R/RWT vs GRM5AA/AA
mGlu5-coupling
(activity-dependent)
1
(steady-state)
3
(activity-dependent)
Acoustic Startle (Fig. 1; sensorimotor processing)== 2=
Prepulse inhibition (PPI; Fig. 1; sensorimotor gating)=2=
Morris water maze acquisition (Fig. 2; spatial learning)=↑ (females)
= (males)
Morris water maze Probe test (Fig. 2; Table 1; spatial memory)=== (quadrant)
↑ (platform)
Morris water maze reversal training (Fig. 2; spatial reversal learning)=n.d.n.d.
Elevated plus maze open arm time and entries (Fig. 3A,B; anxiety; agoraphobia)2
Light-Dark box (Fig. 3C) latency and light entries (anxiety; photophobia/agoraphobia)↓ (latency)
= (entries)
n.d.n.d.
Novel object reactivity (Fig. 3D–F) latency and contacts (anxiety; neophobia/agoraphobia)=↑ (latency)
↓ (contacts)
=
Marble burying test (Fig. 3G) latency and # buried (anxiety; neophobia)=n.d.n.d.
Forced swim test (Fig. 3H,I) (active vs passive coping)==2Less floating (active coping)
Acute cocaine locomotion (Fig. 4A)== 3↑ (10 mg/kg)3
Sensitized cocaine locomotion (Fig. 4B)== 3↓ (10 and 30 mg/kg)3
Dose-response function for cocaine-induced place-preference (Fig. 5A,B)Shift to the rightNo changeShift to the left4
Cocaine taste aversion (Fig. 5D,F)n.d.=
  • ↑ indicates an increase versus WT; ↓ indicates a decrease versus WT; = indicates no genotypic difference; n.d. indicates not determined.

  • 1Cozzoli et al. (2009).

  • 2Guo et al. (2016).

  • 3Park et al. (2013).

  • 4Campbell et al. (2019).