Table 3

Summary of statistical analysis employed in each experiment

ExperimentTestP-valueStatistical valuePost hoc testPair-wise
comparison		P-value
Figure 3D1
microglia cell density		One-way
ANOVA		0.3100F(3,10) = 2.386Bonferroni’s
correction
Figure 3D2
GFAP+ area		One-way
ANOVA		<0.0001F(3,10) = 1.635Bonferroni’s
correction		P4 vs P56
P7 vs P56
P21 vs P56		0.0003
0.0001
0.0093
Figure 4B1
microglia fractal
dimension		One-way
ANOVA		0.0015F(5,16) = 6.757Bonferroni’s
correction		P2 vs P21
P2 vs P56
P4 vs P56		0.0113
0.0021
0.0292
Figure 4D
microglia density		One-way
ANOVA		<0.0001F(5,16) = 13.92Bonferroni’s
correction		P2 vs P4
P2 vs P7
P2 vs P14
P2 vs P21
P2 vs P56		0.0135
0.0024
<0.0001
0.0006
<0.0001
Figure 5B1
microglia cell density-RMS start		Student’s t test<0.0001F(4,4) = 1.742
Figure 5B1
microglia cell density-RMS descent		Student’s t test0.0005F(4,4) = 2.890
Figure 5B2
neuroblast cell density-RMS start		Student’s t test0.0072F(4,4) = 1.850
Figure 5B2
neuroblast cell density-RMS descent		Student’s t test0.9883F(4,4) = 1.436
Figure 5B3
BrdU cell density-RMS start		Student’s t test0.9651F(4,4) = 1.417
Figure 5B3
BrdU cell density-RMS start		Student’s t test0.3559F(4,4) = 1.311
Figure 6C1
microglia cell density-RMS start		Student’s t test<0.0001F(2,3) = 28.69
Figure 6C1
microglia cell density-RMS descent		Student’s t test<0.0001F(2,3) = 885.1
Figure 6C2
neuroblast cell density-RMS start		Student’s t test0.8665F(2,3) = 12.85
Figure 6C2
neuroblast cell density-RMS descent		Student’s t test0.7748F(2,3) = 4.314
Figure 6C2
neuroblast cell density-RMS horizontal limb		Student’s t test0.4449F(2,3) = 4.314
Figure 6C3
neuroblast density ratio- descent/start		Student’s t test0.4940F(2,3) = 2.541
Figure 6C3
neuroblast density ratio-horizontal limb/descent		Student’s t test0.9312F(2,3) = 1.813
Figure 6F1
neuroblast fractal dimension		Student’s t test0.7133F(2,2) = 1.008
Figure 6F2
neuroblast lacunarity		Student’s t test0.6047F(2,2) = 1.662
Figure 6F3
neuroblast density		Student’s t test0.8467F(2,2) = 19056
Figure 6F4
neuroblast span ratio		Student’s t test0.7007F(2,2) = 500.8
Experiment in Figure 9 microglia cell density-RMS startStudent’s t test<0.0001F(3,3) = 162.5
Experiment in Figure. 9 microglia cell density-RMS descentStudent’s t test<0.0001F(3,3) = 123.9
Figure 9B2
CC3+ density-RMS descent		Two-way ANOVAMarker = 0.0099
Genotype = 0.0168
Interaction = 0.029		Marker F(1,5) = 16.33
Genotype F(1,5) = 12.43
Interaction F(1,5) = 19.199		Bonferroni’s
correction		WT vs DTA:
CC3+/DCX+
WT vs DTA:
CC3+/DCX−		0.0018
ns
Figure 10B1
CC3+ density-RMS descent		Two-way ANOVAMarker = 0.0212
Genotype = 0.0238
Interaction = 0.0281		Marker F(1,10) = 7.45
Genotype F(1,10) = 7.083
Interaction F(1,10) = 6.584		Bonferroni’s
correction		WT vs DTA:
CC3+/DCX+
WT vs DTA:
CC3+/DCX−		0.0029
ns
Figure 10B2
RMS width-RMS descent		Student’s t test0.0035F(5,5) = 2.335
Figure 10B3
DCX stain lacunarity		Student’s t test0.0494F(5,5) = 1.339

  • n.s.: not significant.