Mean Spearman’s correlation coefficients averaged across all 15 subjects for the different intrasession and intersession conditions and pRF parameters
Correlation coefficients | Session 1 run 1 vs run 2 | Session 2 run 1 vs run 2 | Run 1 session 1 vs session 2 | Run 2 session 1 vs session 2 | Combined session 1 vs session 2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Eccentricity | 0.916 | 0.903 | 0.879 | 0.890 | 0.886 |
Polar angle | 0.989 | 0.988 | 0.986 | 0.986 | 0.988 |
pRF size | 0.411 | 0.399 | 0.353 | 0.351 | 0.405 |
x | 0.970 | 0.967 | 0.960 | 0.957 | 0.958 |
y | 0.969 | 0.966 | 0.958 | 0.959 | 0.961 |
Simulation results, verifying the systematic shift of correlation values when switching from cartesian to polar coordinates are shown in Extended Data Table 1-1.