Table 7

The effects of EAAT-related drugs on the fraction of correct responses in AIIs at various light stimulus frequencies

	Data	Data structure	Type of test	Power	Mean ± SEM	Number of cells
	Effects of DHK, UCPH101 and TBOA on the fraction of correct responses in AIIs at various stimulus frequencies
	2-Hz stimulus frequency
	Control	Non-normal distribution			1.00 ± 0.00	7
	200 μm DHK + 50 μm UCPH101	Non-normal distribution			1.00 ± 0.00	7
	200 μm DHK + 50 μm UCPH101 + 50 μm TBOA	Normal distribution			0.73 ± 0.08	7
a	Control vs DHK + UCPH		Wilcoxon signed-rank test	N/A		7
b	DHK + UCPH vs DHK + UCPH + TBOA		Wilcoxon signed-rank test	p = 0.0313		7
	5-Hz stimulus frequency
	Control	Non-normal distribution			0.93 ± 0.06	7
	200 μm DHK + 50 μm UCPH101	Non-normal distribution			0.94 ± 0.04	7
	200 μm DHK + 50 μm UCPH101 + 50 μm TBOA	Normal distribution			0.49 ± 0.12	7
c	Control vs DHK + UCPH		Wilcoxon signed-rank test	p > 0.9999		7
d	DHK + UCPH vs DHK + UCPH + TBOA		Wilcoxon signed-rank test	p = 0.0313		7
	10-Hz stimulus frequency
	Control	Non-normal distribution			0.96 ± 0.04	7
	200 μm DHK + 50 μm UCPH101	Non-normal distribution			0.94 ± 0.04	7
	200 μm DHK + 50 μm UCPH101 + 50 μm TBOA	Non-normal distribution			0.27 ± 0.11	7
e	Control vs DHK + UCPH		Wilcoxon signed-rank test	p > 0.9999		7
f	DHK + UCPH vs DHK + UCPH + TBOA		Wilcoxon signed-rank test	p = 0.0156		7
	20-Hz stimulus frequency
	Control	Non-normal distribution			0.94 ± 0.04	7
	200 μm DHK + 50 μm UCPH101	Non-normal distribution			0.94 ± 0.04	7
	200 μm DHK + 50 μm UCPH101 + 50 μm TBOA	Normal distribution			0.19 ± 0.03	7
g	Control vs DHK + UCPH		Wilcoxon signed-rank test	p > 0.9999		7
h	DHK + UCPH vs DHK + UCPH + TBOA		Wilcoxon signed-rank test	p = 0.0156		7
	50-Hz stimulus frequency
	Control	Normal distribution			0.81 ± 0.06	7
	200 μm DHK + 50 μm UCPH101	Normal distribution			0.64 ± 0.08	7
	200 μm DHK + 50 μm UCPH101 + 50 μm TBOA	Non-normal distribution			0.16 ± 0.03	7
i	Control vs DHK + UCPH		Paired t test	p = 0.0533		7
j	DHK + UCPH vs DHK + UCPH + TBOA		Wilcoxon signed-rank test	p = 0.0156		7

	Effects of DHK alone on the fraction of correct responses in AIIs at various stimulus frequencies
	2-Hz stimulus frequency
	Control	Non-normal distribution			1.00 ± 0.00	5
	200 μm DHK	Non-normal distribution			1.00 ± 0.00	5
k	Control vs DHK		Wilcoxon signed-rank test	N/A		5
	5-Hz stimulus frequency
	Control	Non-normal distribution			1.00 ± 0.00	5
	200 μm DHK	Non-normal distribution			1.00 ± 0.00	5
l	Control vs DHK		Wilcoxon signed-rank test	N/A		5
	10-Hz stimulus frequency
	Control	Non-normal distribution			0.92 ± 0.08	5
	200 μm DHK	Non-normal distribution			0.92 ± 0.08	5
m	Control vs DHK		Wilcoxon signed-rank test	N/A		5
	20-Hz stimulus frequency
	Control	Non-normal distribution			1.00 ± 0.00	5
	200 μm DHK	Non-normal distribution			1.00 ± 0.00	5
n	Control vs DHK		Wilcoxon signed-rank test	N/A		5
	50-Hz stimulus frequency
	Control	Non-normal distribution			0.88 ± 0.05	5
	200 μm DHK	Normal distribution			0.80 ± 0.10	5
o	Control vs DHK		Wilcoxon signed-rank test	p = 0.5000		5

TBOA, a non-selective EAAT blocker; UCPH101, a selective EAAT1/GLAST blocker; DHK, a selective EAAT2 blocker; AII, AII amacrine cell; N/A, not applicable.