Table 5

The effects of TBOA on AII responses and RB membrane potentials

	Data	Data structure	Type of test	Power	Mean ± SEM	Number of cells
	Effect of TBOA on AII EPSC amplitude (unit: pA)
	Control	Normal distribution			−237.40 ± 16.21	7
	50 μm TBOA	Non-normal distribution			−547.20 ± 61.50	7
a	Control vs TBOA		Wilcoxon signed-rank test	p = 0.0156		7
	Relative effects of TBOA on AII EPSC amplitude and integral
	Control	Non-normal distribution			1.00 ± 0.00	7
	50 μm TBOA (amplitude)	Normal distribution			2.31 ± 0.20	7
	50 μm TBOA (integral)	Non-normal distribution			11.22 ± 1.70	7
b	Control vs TBOA (amplitude)		Wilcoxon signed-rank test	p = 0.0156		7
c	Control vs TBOA (integral)		Wilcoxon signed-rank test	p = 0.0156		7
d	TBOA (amplitude) vs TBOA (integral)		Wilcoxon signed-rank test	p = 0.0156		7
	Relative effect of DHK on AII EPSC amplitude
	200 μm DHK	Normal distribution			1.18 ± 0.04	7
e	DHK vs TBOA (amplitude)		Unpaired Student’s t test	p = 0.0001
	Effect of TBOA on AII EPSC time to peak (unit: ms)
	Control	Normal distribution			14.16 ± 0.62	7
	50 μm TBOA	Normal distribution			26.21 ± 2.12	7
f	Control vs TBOA		Paired Student’s t test	p = 0.0004		7
	Effect of TBOA on AII EPSC rise time (unit: ms)
	Control	Normal distribution			3.34 ± 0.75	7
	50 μm TBOA	Normal distribution			10.23 ± 1.99	7
g	Control vs TBOA		Paired Student’s t test	p = 0.0032		7
	Effect of TBOA on AII EPSC tau (unit: ms)
	Control	Non-normal distribution			64.54 ± 20.61	7
	50 μm TBOA	Normal distribution			325 ± 68.02	7
h	Control vs TBOA		Paired Student’s t test	p = 0.0050		7
	Effect of TBOA on AII mEPSC frequency (unit: Hz)
	Control	Normal distribution			6.19 ± 1.14	7
	50 μm TBOA	Normal distribution			6.19 ± 1.19	7
i	Control vs TBOA		Paired Student’s t test	p = 0.9854		7
	Effect of TBOA on AII mEPSC amplitude (unit: pA)
	Control	Normal distribution			−19.98 ± 1.55	7
	50 μm TBOA	Normal distribution			−20.13 ± 1.57	7
j	Control vs TBOA		Paired Student’s t test	p = 0.8856		7
	Effect of TBOA on AII mEPSC rise time (unit: ms)
	Control	Non-normal distribution			0.32 ± 0.01	7
	50 μm TBOA	Normal distribution			0.32 ± 0.01	7
k	Control vs TBOA		Wilcoxon signed-rank test	p > 0.9999		7
	Effect of TBOA on AII mEPSC tau (unit: ms)
	Control	Normal distribution			0.75 ± 0.04	7
	50 μm TBOA	Normal distribution			0.81 ± 0.06	7
l	Control vs TBOA		Paired Student’s t test	p = 0.0392		7
	Effect of TBOA on RB light-evoked voltage change (unit: mV)
	Control	Normal distribution			8.69 ± 0.39	5
	50 μm TBOA	Normal distribution			9.64 ± 0.51	5
m	Control vs TBOA		Paired Student’s t test	p = 0.0192		5
	Effect of TBOA on RB resting membrane potential (unit: mV)
	Control	Normal distribution			−52.92 ± 2.01	5
	50 μm TBOA	Normal distribution			−52.91 ± 2.95	5
n	Control vs TBOA		Paired Student’s t test	p = 0.9931		5
	Relative effects of DHK and TBOA on RB light-evoked voltage change
	200 μm DHK	Normal distribution			1.16 ± 0.03	6
	50 μm TBOA	Normal distribution			1.11 ± 0.03	5
o	DHK vs TBOA		Unpaired Student’s t test	p = 0.3226

TBOA, a non-selective EAAT blocker; DHK, a selective EAAT2 blocker; AII, AII amacrine cell; RB, rod bipolar cell.