Table 8

The effects of EAAT-related drugs on the average amplitude of AII EPSPs at various light stimulus frequencies

	Data	Data structure	Type of test	Power	Mean ± SEM	Number of cells
	Effects of DHK, UCPH101 and TBOA on the average amplitude of AII EPSPs at various stimulus frequencies
	2-Hz stimulus frequency
	Control	Normal distribution			15.75 ± 1.77	7
	200 μm DHK + 50 μm UCPH101	Normal distribution			14.62 ± 1.77	7
	200 μm DHK + 50 μm UCPH101 + 50 μm TBOA	Normal distribution			5.44 ± 0.97	7
a	Control vs DHK + UCPH		Paired t test	p = 0.1704		7
b	DHK + UCPH vs DHK + UCPH + TBOA		Paired t test	p = 0.0013		7
	5-Hz stimulus frequency
	Control	Normal distribution			14.58 ± 1.16	7
	200 μm DHK + 50 μm UCPH101	Normal distribution			14.36 ± 1.48	7
	200 μm DHK + 50 μm UCPH101 + 50 μm TBOA	Normal distribution			5.35 ± 0.62	7
c	Control vs DHK + UCPH		Paired t test	p = 0.7810		7
d	DHK + UCPH vs DHK + UCPH + TBOA		Paired t test	p = 0.0007		7
	10-Hz stimulus frequency
	Control	Normal distribution			11.90 ± 1.66	7
	200 μm DHK + 50 μm UCPH101	Normal distribution			10.74 ± 1.79	7
	200 μm DHK + 50 μm UCPH101 + 50 μm TBOA	Normal distribution			2.70 ± 0.52	7
e	Control vs DHK + UCPH		Paired t test	p = 0.0746		7
f	DHK + UCPH vs DHK + UCPH + TBOA		Paired t test	p = 0.0054		7
	20-Hz stimulus frequency
	Control	Normal distribution			13.41 ± 1.74	7
	200 μm DHK + 50 μm UCPH101	Normal distribution			12.45 ± 2.42	7
	200 μm DHK + 50 μm UCPH101 + 50 μm TBOA	Normal distribution			4.12 ± 0.29	7
g	Control vs DHK + UCPH		Paired t test	p = 0.4964		7
h	DHK + UCPH vs DHK + UCPH + TBOA		Paired t test	p = 0.0116		7
	50-Hz stimulus frequency
	Control	Normal distribution			9.99 ± 1.42	7
	200 μm DHK + 50 μm UCPH101	Normal distribution			8.67 ± 1.65	7
	200 μm DHK + 50 μm UCPH101 + 50 μm TBOA	Non-normal distribution			3.58 ± 0.24	7
i	Control vs DHK + UCPH		Paired t test	p = 0.0763		7
j	DHK + UCPH vs DHK + UCPH + TBOA		Wilcoxon signed-rank test	p = 0.0156		7

	Effects of DHK alone on the average amplitude of AII EPSPs at various stimulus frequencies
	2-Hz stimulus frequency
	Control	Normal distribution			14.33 ± 3.61	5
	200 μm DHK	Normal distribution			13.46 ± 2.41	5
k	Control vs DHK		Paired t test	p = 0.6330		5
	5-Hz stimulus frequency
	Control	Normal distribution			13.25 ± 1.97	5
	200 μm DHK	Normal distribution			12.57 ± 1.71	5
l	Control vs DHK		Paired t test	p = 0.5547		5
	10-Hz stimulus frequency
	Control	Normal distribution			11.26 ± 1.87	5
	200 μm DHK	Normal distribution			10.65 ± 1.55	5
m	Control vs DHK		Paired t test	p = 0.4382		5
	20-Hz stimulus frequency
	Control	Normal distribution			11.26 ± 0.76	5
	200 μm DHK	Normal distribution			11.51 ± 1.08	5
n	Control vs DHK		Paired t test	p = 0.8054		5
	50-Hz stimulus frequency
	Control	Normal distribution			8.74 ± 1.07	5
	200 μm DHK	Normal distribution			7.88 ± 1.05	5
o	Control vs DHK		Paired t test	p = 0.0780		5

TBOA, a non-selective EAAT blocker; UCPH101, a selective EAAT1/GLAST blocker; DHK, a selective EAAT2 blocker; AII, AII amacrine cell.