Table 6

The effects of UCPH101 on AII responses

	Data	Data structure	Type of test	Power	Mean ± SEM	Number of cells
	Effect of UCPH on AII EPSC amplitude
	Control	Normal distribution			−315.00 ± 22.05	8
	50 μm UCPH	Normal distribution			−300.60 ± 21.52	8
a	Control vs UCPH		Paired Student’s t test	p = 0.1588		8
	Effect of UCPH on AII EPSC time to peak (unit: ms)
	Control	Normal distribution			14.08 ± 0.53	8
	50 μm UCPH	Normal distribution			13.69 ± 0.63	8
b	Control vs UCPH		Paired Student’s t test	p = 0.6306		8
	Effect of UCPH on AII mEPSC frequency (unit: Hz)
	Control	Normal distribution			6.95 ± 2.24	8
	50 μm UCPH	Normal distribution			7.22 ± 2.37	8
c	Control vs UCPH		Paired Student’s t test	p = 0.4685		8
	DHK effect on AII mEPSC amplitude (unit: pA)
	Control	Normal distribution			−21.62 ± 0.78	8
	50 μm UCPH	Normal distribution			−19.94 ± 0.82	8
d	Control vs UCPH		Paired Student’s t test	p = 0.0707		8
	Effect of UCPH on AII mEPSC rise time (unit: ms)
	Control	Non-normal distribution			0.32 ± 0.01	8
	50 μm UCPH	Normal distribution			0.32 ± 0.01	8
e	Control vs UCPH		Wilcoxon signed-rank test	p = 0.8125		8
	Effect of UCPH on AII mEPSC tau (unit: ms)
	Control	Normal distribution			0.75 ± 0.04	8
	50 μm UCPH	Normal distribution			0.76 ± 0.03	8
f	Control vs UCPH		Paired Student’s t test	p = 0.6382		8