Table 2

Statistical table

FigureGroup comparisonData structureType of testp value95% confidence interval
1DgfCDM vs gfCDM + KSRNormal distributionWelch’s t testp < 0.000159.03, 65.52
1Gd9 vs d10Normal distributionDunnett testp = 0.55798−3.63, 11.94
d9 vs d11Normal distributionDunnett testp = 0.001663.89, 19.46
d9 vs d12Normal distributionDunnett testp = 0.000335.95, 21.52
d9 vs d13Normal distributionDunnett testp < 0.00017.41, 22.98
d9 vs d14Normal distributionDunnett testp = 0.12627−1.21, 14.37
d9 vs d15Normal distributionDunnett testp = 0.14666−1.42, 14.16
d9 vs d16Normal distributionDunnett testp = 0.15859−1.53, 14.05
d9 vs d17Normal distributionDunnett testp = 0.99996−6.85, 8.73
d9 vs d18Normal distributionDunnett testp = 0.95885−5.48, 10.09
d9 vs d19Normal distributionDunnett testp = 0.90193−5.06, 10.51
2A*d14 vs d17Normal distributionDunnett testp = 0.5707−0.20, 1.51
d14 vs d21Normal distributionDunnett testp = 0.1578−5.06, 10.51
d14 vs d25Normal distributionDunnett testp = 0.00930.28, 1.99
d14 vs d28Normal distributionDunnett testp = 0.00360.45, 2.16
d14 vs d31Normal distributionDunnett testp = 0.00100.66, 2.38
2C, “long”d22 vs d36Normal distributionWelch’s t testp < 0.0001−4.53, −3.86
2C, “short”d22 vs d36Normal distributionWelch’s t testp < 0.0001−3.15, −2.69
2HgfCDM vs gfCDM + KSRNormal distributionWelch’s t testp < 0.000138.75, 60.04
3B*d14 vs d31Normal distributionWelch’s t testp = 0.01818−2.89, −0.52
5C, topSAG (−) vs (+)Normal distributionWelch’s t testp < 0.000170.25, 93.41
5C, bottomSAG (−) vs (+)Normal distributionWelch’s t testp < 0.0001−92.79, −82.23
5FSAG (−) vs (+)Normal distributionWelch’s t testp = 0.009963−45.36, −8.52
5HSAG (−) vs (+)Normality not assumedBrunner–Munzel testp < 0.00010.77, 1.04

  • ↵* Log10-transformed data were used for statistical analysis.