Table 1

Eyeblink conditioning outcome measures during acquisition training (sessions 1–10)

SessionCR percentageCR amp-all trialsCR amp-CR only trialsLatency to CR peakLatency to CR onset
114 (±8)0.11 (±0.05)0.19 (±0.06)329.7 (±51.1)130.7 (±276.3)
233 (±12)0.23 (±0.10)0.30 (±0.12)306.7 (±31.6)124.9 (±41.5)
337 (±16)0.27 (±0.16)0.39 (±0.19)314.3 (±28.4)116.5 (±31.8)
438 (±13)0.30 (±0.19)0.44 (±0.21)302.6 (±22.7)137.8 (±56.7)
542 (±15)0.37 (±0.15)0.46 (±0.20)303.4 (±28.0)139.9 (±44.8)
650 (±15)0.40 (±0.15)0.53 (±0.17)313.8 (±30.9)114.0 (±23.7)
756 (±16)0.33 (±0.12)0.44 (±0.13)313.5 (±28.2)145.7 (±61.8)
863 (±17)0.48 (±0.15)0.56 (±0.14)310.0 (±24.2)122.1 (±95.8)
967 (±14)0.48 (±0.11)0.59 (±0.10)312.5 (±24.6)119.2 (±37.1)
1067 (±14)0.45 (±0.11)0.56 (±0.10)313.5 (±29.2)151.5 (±19.5)
ANOVA on LMEF(9,90) = 10.85,
p < 0.0001
F(9,2000) = 16.56,
p < 0.0001
F(9,931) = 8.14,
p < 0.0001
F(9,931) = 0.62,
p = 0.77
F(9,90) = 1.47,
p = 0.17
  • All values represent mean ± 95% CI. The ANOVA on linear mixed-effect (LME) model shows the main effect of session. CR, conditioned response.