Table 5

Overview of previous studies on stimulus generalization and Pavlovian eyeblink conditioning studies

AuthorsAnimalsCS typeUSCRMethodsAnalysisResultsTraining typeCSProbe CSs
Siegel et al. (1968)RabbitTone4-mA shockNM responseDC signal(i)CR percentage single subject/averageCR decremental gradientNondifferential0.5 kHz 75 dB0.5, 1.2, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0 kHz dB
Tone1.2 kHz 75 dB0.5, 1.2, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0 kHz dB
Tone2.0 kHz 75 dB0.5, 1.2, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0 kHz dB
Tone3.0 kHz 75 dB0.5, 1.2, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0 kHz dB
Tone4.0 kHz 75 dB0.5, 1.2, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0 kHz dB
Hupka et al. (1969)RabbitTone2-mA shockNM responseDC signal(i) CR percentage averageCR decremental gradient steeper for the CS+ 0.4 kHzDifferentialCS+ 0.4 kHz
CS–1.6 kHz
0.4, 0.8, 1.6, 2.2, 2.8, 3.4, 4.0 kHz
ToneDifferentialCS+ 1.6 kHz
CS– 2.8 kHz
0.4, 0.8, 1.6, 2.2, 2.8, 3.4, 4.0 kHz
ToneDifferentialCS+ 2.8 kHz
CS– 4.0 kHz
0.4, 0.8, 1.6, 2.2, 2.8, 3.4, 4.0 kHz
ToneDifferentialCS+ 1.6 kHz
CS– 0.4 kHz
0.4, 0.8, 1.6, 2.2, 2.8, 3.4, 4.0 kHz
ToneDifferentialCS+ 2.8 kHz
CS– 1.6 kHz
0.4, 0.8, 1.6, 2.2, 2.8, 3.4, 4.0 kHz
ToneDifferentialCS+ 4.0 kHz
CS– 2.8 kHz
0.4, 0.8, 1.6, 2.2, 2.8, 3.4, 4.0 kHz
Swadlow and Schneiderman (1970)RabbitElectrical stimulat5-mA shockEyelid response(i)CR percentage averageCR decremental gradient for frequency + duration/intensity, but no frequency + TSENondifferentialLGN 1.5 s trains (21 pps, 0.21 ms)LGN-a 1.5 pulse trains (18 test param with change in frequency + TSE/pulse dur/ intensity)
Liu (1971)RabbitTone2-mA shockNM responseEMG(i)CR percentage averageCR decremental gradient peak at probe CS (1.4 kHz 75 dB)NondifferentialCS+ 2.4 kHz 75 dB
CS+ 1.2 kHz 75 dB (C2*)
0.4, 0.8, 1.2, 1.6, 2.0 kHz 75 dB
ToneCR decremental gradient steeper at CS+ in T-T and T-L than C1Nondifferential1.2 kHz 75 dB (C1*)0.4, 0.8, 1.2, 1.6, 2.0 kHz 75 dB
ToneDifferentialCS+ 1.2 kHz 75 dB
CS– 2.4 kHz 75 dB (T-T*)
0.4, 0.8, 1.2, 1.6, 2.0 kHz 75 dB
Tone/lightDifferentialCS+ 1.2 kHz 75 dB
CS– light (T-L*)
0.4, 0.8, 1.2, 1.6, 2.0 kHz 75 dB
ToneCR decremental gradient slope steeper along (F) than (I)DifferentialCS+ 1.2 kHz 75 dB
CS– 2.4 kHz 60 dB (I + F*)
0.4, 0.8, 1.2, 1.6, 2.0 kHz 75 dB 1.2 kHz 65, 70, 80, 85 dB
Moore (1972)RabbitTone2-mA shockEyelid responseEMG(i)CR percentage averageCR decremental steeper in T-T and T-LNondifferential1.2 kHz (T)0.4, 0.8, 1.2, 1.6, 2.0 kHz
ToneDifferentialCS+ 1.2 kHz
CS– 2.4 kHz (T-T)
0.4, 0.8, 1.2, 1.6, 2.0 kHz
Tone/lightDifferentialCS+ 1.2 kHz
CS– light (T-L)
0.4, 0.8, 1.2, 1.6, 2.0 kHz
Moore and Mis (1973)RabbitTone2-mA shockNM responseDC signal(i)CR percentage averageCR percentage to CS-lower for differential trainingNondifferential0.9 kHz 75 dB0.3, 0.6, 0.9, 1.2, 1.5, 1.8, 2.1 kHz 75 dB
ToneNondifferential0.9 kHz 95 dB0.3, 0.6, 0.9, 1.2, 1.5, 1.8, 2.1 kHz 75 dB
ToneNondifferential1.5 kHz 75 dB0.3, 0.6, 0.9, 1.2, 1.5, 1.8, 2.1 kHz 75 dB
ToneNondifferential1.5 kHz 95 dB0.3, 0.6, 0.9, 1.2, 1.5, 1.8, 2.1 kHz 95 dB
ToneDifferentialCS+ 1.5 kHz 75 dB
CS– 0.9 kHz 75 dB
0.3, 0.6, 0.9, 1.2, 1.5, 1.8, 2.1 kHz 75 dB
ToneDifferentialCS– 0.9 kHz 75 dB
CS– 1.5 kHz 75 dB
0.3, 0.6, 0.9, 1.2, 1.5, 1.8, 2.1 kHz 75 dB
ToneDifferentialCS+ 1.5 kHz 75 dB
CS– 0.9 kHz 95 dB
0.3, 0.6, 0.9, 1.2, 1.5, 1.8, 2.1 kHz 95 dB
ToneDifferentialCS+ 1.5 kHz 95 dB
CS– 0.9 kHz 75 dB
0.3, 0.6, 0.9, 1.2, 1.5, 1.8, 2.1 kHz 95 dB
Solomon and Moore (1975)RabbitTone2-mA shockNM responseDC signal(i)CR percentage average(i) CR percentage gradient less steep for HP and CTX groupNondifferential1.2 kHz 76 dB0.4, 0.8, 1.2, 1.6, 2.0 kHz 76 dB
ToneNondifferential1.2 kHz 76 dB (lesion HP)0.4, 0.8, 1.2, 1.6, 2.0 kHz 76 dB
ToneNondifferential1.2 kHz 76 dB (lesion CTX)0.4, 0.8, 1.2, 1.6, 2.0 kHz 76 dB
Kehoe et al. (1995)RabbitTone2-mA shockNM responsePhotoelectric transducer(i)CR percentage/amplitude/onset average(i)CR onset earlier in (A), (D)
(ii)CR amplitude/percentage lower in (A) and (D) than (S)
Nondifferential0.5 kHz 55 dB 0.5–1.5(A*), 1.5–0.5(D*), 0.5 kHz(S*)
ToneNondifferential1.0 kHz 55 dB0.5–1.5, 1.5–0.5, 1.0 kHz
ToneNondifferential1.5 kHz 55 dB0.5–1.5, 1.5–0.5, 1.0 kHz
Tone(i)CR onset earlier in (A), (D)Nondifferential60 dB60–90 dB, 90–60 dB, 60 dB
ToneNondifferential75 dB60–90 dB, 90–60 dB, 75 dB
ToneNondifferential90 dB60–90 dB, 90–60 dB, 90 dB
Tone(i)CR decremental gradient likelihood/amplitude (ii) CR onset unchangedNondifferential50 ms50, 400, 800, 1600 ms
ToneNondifferential400 ms50, 400, 800, 1600 ms
ToneNondifferential800 ms50, 400, 800, 1600 ms
Svensson et al. (1997)Ferretselectric stimulat3-mA shockEyelid responseEMG(i)CR onset/peaktime average(i)CR onset/peaktime earlierNondifferentialLeft FL* 300 ms 50 Hz 1 mALeft FL 300 ms 50 Hz 2 mA
electric stimulatNondifferentialMCP* 0.1 ms 50 HzMCP 0.1 ms 100 Hz
Garcia et al. (2003)RabbitTone4-mA shock(i)NM response (ii) eyelid response(i) infrared LED (ii) photoelectric transucer(i)CR percentage/amplitude/onset/peaktime average(i)CR percentage/amplitude decremental gradient
(ii)CR onset/peaktime increment
Nondifferential1.0 kHz 75 dB1.0, 1.26, 1.59, 2.0, 2.52, 3.17, 4.0, 5.04 kHz 75 dB
Ohyama et al. (2003)RabbitTone0.8- to 2.5-mA shockEyelid responseInfrared LED(i)CR/SLR percentage/amplitude average(i)SLR/CR decremental gradient (excl light) (ii)CR amplitude unchangedNondifferential1.0 kHz 85 dB1.0, 1.85, 3.55, 6.1, 9.5 85 dB, light
Tone(I)SLR/CR amplitude decremental gradientNondifferential1.0 kHz 85 dB (PCX*) cerebellar cortex1.0, 1.85, 3.55, 6.1, 9.5 85 dB, light
Tone(i)SLR/CR decremental gradient
(excl light) (ii)CR amplitude unchanged
Nondifferential9.5 kHz 85 dB1.0, 1.85, 3.55, 6.1, 9.5 85 dB, light
Tone(I)SLR/CR amplitude decremental gradientNondifferential1.0 kHz 85 dB (PCX) cerebellar cortex1.0, 1.85, 3.55, 6.1, 9.5 85 dB, light
light(i)SLR/CR light onlyNondifferentialLight1.0, 1.85, 3.55, 6.1, 9.5 85 dB, light
Svensson et al. (2010)FerretsElectrical
stimulat
3-mA shockEyelid responseEMG(i) SS suppression single PCs(i) SS* suppression earlier in PCs (ii) PCs fire freq unchangedNondifferentialFL 0.5 kHz 300 ms 1 mA pulse trainFL 0.5 kHz 300 ms 2 mA pulse train
Electrical
stimulat
CF 0.50 kHz 10 ms (x2)Eyelid responseEMG(i) SS suppression single PCs(i)SS suppression earlier in PCsNondifferentialMF* 0.5 kHz 400–800 ms pulse trainMF 1.0 kHz 400–800 ms pulse train
Khilkevich et al. (2018)RabbitTone1- to 3-mA shockEyelid responseInfrared LED(i)CR percentage/amplitude average(i) CR decremental gradient
(ii) CR amplitude unchanged
Nondifferential1.0 kHz 75 dB 500 ms1.0 kHz 75 dB 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 350, 400, 450 ms
Electrical
stimulat
NondifferentialMF pulse train 100 Hz 100–150 mAMF pulse train 90, 80, 70, 60, 50 Hz 100–150 mA
Electrical
stimulat
NondifferentialMF pulse train 100 Hz 100–150 mAMF (competing) pulse train 100 Hz 100–150 mA
  • Note that none of these studies was done in mice.

  • C1, 1 CS (tone/light); C2, 2 CSs (reinforced tone); T, 1 CS tone; T-T, tone-tone; T-L, tone-light; F + I, frequency + intensity; A, ascending tone; D, descending tone; S, steady tone; FL, forelimb; MCP, middle cerebellar peduncle; MF, mossy fibers; PCX, picrotoxin; TSE, total stimulus energy; LGN,lateral geniculate nucleus; HP, hippocampus; CTX, cortex