Table 2

Eyeblink conditioning outcome measures during generalization test sessions (sessions 11–17)

Tone freq.CR percentageCR amp-all trialsCR amp-CR only trialsLatency to CR peakLatency to CR onset
2 kHz38 (±6)0.20 (±0.04)0.42 (±0.05)310.0 (±13.9)162.5 (±15.0)
4 kHz43 (±7)0.28 (±0.06)0.49 (±0.07)323.9 (±15.7)147.8 (±17.9)
6 kHz50 (±6)0.34 (±0.05)0.54 (±0.05)311.0 (±9.10)158.1 (±21.4)
8 kHz58 (±6)0.42 (±0.04)0.56 (±0.04)315.1 (±9.79)148.8 (±23.3)
10 kHz67 (±5)0.51 (±0.04)0.63 (±0.04)320.1 (±8.96)145.3 (±16.0)
12 kHz65 (±5)0.46 (±0.04)0.60 (±0.04)311.5 (±9.72)151.3 (±18.9)
14 kHz63 (±5)0.43 (±0.04)0.59 (±0.04)327.8 (±10.3)142.6 (±13.1)
16 kHz61 (±4)0.40 (±0.03)0.55 (±0.04)324.9 (±11.8)155.8 (±13.4)
18 kHz55 (±6)0.31 (±0.04)0.47 (±0.05)332.1 (±12.5)141.2 (±16.0)
20 kHz55 (±6)0.29 (±0.04)0.46 (±0.05)341.3 (±13.6)152.8 (±13.3)
ANOVA on LMEF(9,726) = 11.99,
p < 0.0001
F(9,4849) = 44.34,
p < 0.0001
F(9,2692) = 16.70,
p < 0.0001
F(9,2692) = 5.56,
p < 0.0001
F(9,322) = 1.12,
p = 0.34
  • All values represent mean ± 95% CI. The ANOVA on linear mixed-effect (LME) model shows the main effect sound frequency. Post hoc comparisons are shown in Figure 6 and Tables 3, 4. CR, conditioned response. Bold values represent outcome measures values in response to the trained CS of 10-kHz during stimulus generalization test.