Summary of statistical analyses
| Figure | Measurement | Comparison | Statistical test | Test results |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3D | d′ | Without laser presentation vs with laser presentation (N = 8 PV::ChR2 mice) | Wilcoxon signed-rank test | p = 0.0117, T = 0 |
| 3E | Hit rate (%) | Without laser presentation vs with laser presentation (N = 8 PV::ChR2 mice) | Wilcoxon signed-rank test | p = 0.0117, T = 0 |
| 3F | False alarm rate (%) | Without laser presentation vs with laser presentation (N = 8 PV::ChR2 mice) | Wilcoxon signed-rank test | p = 0.0251, T = 2 |
| 3G | Laser-induced change in d′ | Laser directed at AC vs laser directed away from AC (N = 8 PV::ChR2 mice) | Correlation coefficient | p = 0.593 r = 0.224 |
| 3H | Laser-induced change in hit rate (%) | Laser directed at AC vs laser directed away from AC (N = 8 PV::ChR2 mice) | Correlation coefficient | p = 0.710, r = 0.157 |
| 3I | Laser-induced change in false alarm rate (%) | Laser directed at AC vs laser directed away from AC (N = 8 PV::ChR2 mice) | Correlation coefficient | p = 0.589, r = 0.227 |
| 5A | Sampling time (ms) | Without laser presentation vs with laser presentation (N = 8 PV::ChR2 mice) | Wilcoxon signed-rank test | p = 0.0925, T = 6 |
| 5B | Time to reward (ms) | Without laser presentation vs with laser presentation (N = 8 PV::ChR2 mice) | Wilcoxon signed-rank test | p = 0.779, T = 16 |
| 5C | Laser-induced change in sampling time (ms) | Laser directed at AC vs laser directed away from AC (N = 8 PV::ChR2 mice) | Correlation coefficient | p = 0.675, r = 0.177 |
| 5D | Laser-induced change in time to reward (ms) | Laser directed at AC vs laser directed away from AC (N = 8 PV::ChR2 mice) | Correlation coefficient | p = 0.686 r = –0.171 |
| 6C | d′ | Without laser presentation vs with laser presentation (N = 13 PV::ArchT mice) | Wilcoxon signed-rank test | p = 0.0046, T = 5 |
| 6D | Hit rate (%) | Without laser presentation vs with laser presentation (N = 13 PV::ArchT mice) | Wilcoxon signed-rank test | p = 0.0330, T = 15 |
| 6E | False alarm rate (%) | Without laser presentation vs with laser presentation (N = 13 PV::ArchT mice) | Wilcoxon signed-rank test | p = 0.861, T = 43 |
| 6F | Laser-induced change in d′ | Laser directed at AC vs laser directed away from AC (N = 13 PV::ArchT mice) | Correlation coefficient | p = 0.609, r = 0.157 |
| 6G | Laser-induced change in hit rate (%) | Laser directed at AC vs laser directed away from AC (N = 13 PV::ArchT mice) | Correlation coefficient | p = 0.657 r = –0.136 |
| 6H | Laser-induced change in false alarm rate (%) | Laser directed at AC vs laser directed away from AC (N = 13 PV::ArchT mice) | Correlation coefficient | p = 0.981 r = –0.0073 |
| 6K | d′ | Without laser presentation vs with laser presentation (N = 10 SOM::ArchT mice) | Wilcoxon signed-rank test | p = 0.0051, T = 0 |
| 6L | Hit rate (%) | Without laser presentation vs with laser presentation (N = 10 SOM::ArchT mice) | Wilcoxon signed-rank test | p = 0.0051, T = 0 |
| 6M | False alarm rate (%) | Without laser presentation vs with laser presentation (N = 10 SOM::ArchT mice) | Wilcoxon signed-rank test | p = 0.878, T = 26 |
| 6N | Laser-induced change in d′ | Laser directed at AC vs laser directed away from AC (N = 10 SOM::ArchT mice) | Correlation coefficient | p = 0.546, r = 0.218 |
| 6O | Laser-induced change in hit rate (%) | Laser directed at AC vs laser directed away from AC (N = 10 SOM::ArchT mice) | Correlation coefficient | p = 0.0494, r = 0.633 |
| 6P | Laser-induced change in false alarm rate (%) | Laser directed at AC vs laser directed away from AC (N = 10 SOM::ArchT mice) | Correlation coefficient | p = 0.0725, r = 0.590 |
| 6 | Laser-induced change in d′ | Laser directed at AC in PV::ArchT mice (N = 13) vs SOM::ArchT mice (N = 10) | Wilcoxon rank-sum test | p = 0.321, T = 0.992 |
| 8A | Sampling time (ms) | Without laser presentation vs with laser presentation (N = 13 PV::ArchT mice) | Wilcoxon signed-rank test | p = 0.0652, T = 15.5 |
| 8B | Laser-induced change in sampling time (ms) | Laser directed at AC vs laser directed away from AC (N = 13 PV::ArchT mice) | Correlation coefficient | p = 0.0017, r = 0.780 |
| 8C | Time to reward (ms) | Without laser presentation vs with laser presentation (N = 13 PV::ArchT mice) | Wilcoxon signed-rank test | p = 0.0029, T = 1 |
| 8D | Laser-induced change in time to reward (ms) | Laser directed at AC vs laser directed away from AC (N = 13 PV::ArchT mice) | Correlation coefficient | p = 0.901, r = 0.0383 |
| 8E | Sampling time (ms) | Without laser presentation vs with laser presentation (N = 10 SOM::ArchT mice) | Wilcoxon signed-rank test | p = 0.0050, T = 0 |
| 8F | Laser-induced change in sampling time (ms) | Laser directed at AC vs laser directed away from AC (N = 10 SOM::ArchT mice) | Correlation coefficient | p = 0.901, r = 0.0453 |
| 8G | Time to reward (ms) | Without laser presentation vs with laser presentation (N = 10 SOM::ArchT mice) | Wilcoxon signed-rank test | p = 0.203, T = 15 |
| 8H | Laser-induced change in time to reward (ms) | Laser directed at AC vs laser directed away from AC (N = 10 SOM::ArchT mice) | Correlation coefficient | p = 0.470, r = 0.259 |