Figure | Measurement | Comparison | Statistical test | Test results |
---|---|---|---|---|

3D | d′ | Without laser presentation vs with laser presentation (N = 8 PV::ChR2 mice) | Wilcoxon signed-rank test | p = 0.0117, T = 0 |

3E | Hit rate (%) | Without laser presentation vs with laser presentation (N = 8 PV::ChR2 mice) | Wilcoxon signed-rank test | p = 0.0117, T = 0 |

3F | False alarm rate (%) | Without laser presentation vs with laser presentation (N = 8 PV::ChR2 mice) | Wilcoxon signed-rank test | p = 0.0251, T = 2 |

3G | Laser-induced change in d′ | Laser directed at AC vs laser directed away from AC (N = 8 PV::ChR2 mice) | Correlation coefficient | p = 0.593 r = 0.224 |

3H | Laser-induced change in hit rate (%) | Laser directed at AC vs laser directed away from AC (N = 8 PV::ChR2 mice) | Correlation coefficient | p = 0.710, r = 0.157 |

3I | Laser-induced change in false alarm rate (%) | Laser directed at AC vs laser directed away from AC (N = 8 PV::ChR2 mice) | Correlation coefficient | p = 0.589, r = 0.227 |

5A | Sampling time (ms) | Without laser presentation vs with laser presentation (N = 8 PV::ChR2 mice) | Wilcoxon signed-rank test | p = 0.0925, T = 6 |

5B | Time to reward (ms) | Without laser presentation vs with laser presentation (N = 8 PV::ChR2 mice) | Wilcoxon signed-rank test | p = 0.779, T = 16 |

5C | Laser-induced change in sampling time (ms) | Laser directed at AC vs laser directed away from AC (N = 8 PV::ChR2 mice) | Correlation coefficient | p = 0.675, r = 0.177 |

5D | Laser-induced change in time to reward (ms) | Laser directed at AC vs laser directed away from AC (N = 8 PV::ChR2 mice) | Correlation coefficient | p = 0.686 r = –0.171 |

6C | d′ | Without laser presentation vs with laser presentation (N = 13 PV::ArchT mice) | Wilcoxon signed-rank test | p = 0.0046, T = 5 |

6D | Hit rate (%) | Without laser presentation vs with laser presentation (N = 13 PV::ArchT mice) | Wilcoxon signed-rank test | p = 0.0330, T = 15 |

6E | False alarm rate (%) | Without laser presentation vs with laser presentation (N = 13 PV::ArchT mice) | Wilcoxon signed-rank test | p = 0.861, T = 43 |

6F | Laser-induced change in d′ | Laser directed at AC vs laser directed away from AC (N = 13 PV::ArchT mice) | Correlation coefficient | p = 0.609, r = 0.157 |

6G | Laser-induced change in hit rate (%) | Laser directed at AC vs laser directed away from AC (N = 13 PV::ArchT mice) | Correlation coefficient | p = 0.657 r = –0.136 |

6H | Laser-induced change in false alarm rate (%) | Laser directed at AC vs laser directed away from AC (N = 13 PV::ArchT mice) | Correlation coefficient | p = 0.981 r = –0.0073 |

6K | d′ | Without laser presentation vs with laser presentation (N = 10 SOM::ArchT mice) | Wilcoxon signed-rank test | p = 0.0051, T = 0 |

6L | Hit rate (%) | Without laser presentation vs with laser presentation (N = 10 SOM::ArchT mice) | Wilcoxon signed-rank test | p = 0.0051, T = 0 |

6M | False alarm rate (%) | Without laser presentation vs with laser presentation (N = 10 SOM::ArchT mice) | Wilcoxon signed-rank test | p = 0.878, T = 26 |

6N | Laser-induced change in d′ | Laser directed at AC vs laser directed away from AC (N = 10 SOM::ArchT mice) | Correlation coefficient | p = 0.546, r = 0.218 |

6O | Laser-induced change in hit rate (%) | Laser directed at AC vs laser directed away from AC (N = 10 SOM::ArchT mice) | Correlation coefficient | p = 0.0494, r = 0.633 |

6P | Laser-induced change in false alarm rate (%) | Laser directed at AC vs laser directed away from AC (N = 10 SOM::ArchT mice) | Correlation coefficient | p = 0.0725, r = 0.590 |

6 | Laser-induced change in d′ | Laser directed at AC in PV::ArchT mice (N = 13) vs SOM::ArchT mice (N = 10) | Wilcoxon rank-sum test | p = 0.321, T = 0.992 |

8A | Sampling time (ms) | Without laser presentation vs with laser presentation (N = 13 PV::ArchT mice) | Wilcoxon signed-rank test | p = 0.0652, T = 15.5 |

8B | Laser-induced change in sampling time (ms) | Laser directed at AC vs laser directed away from AC (N = 13 PV::ArchT mice) | Correlation coefficient | p = 0.0017, r = 0.780 |

8C | Time to reward (ms) | Without laser presentation vs with laser presentation (N = 13 PV::ArchT mice) | Wilcoxon signed-rank test | p = 0.0029, T = 1 |

8D | Laser-induced change in time to reward (ms) | Laser directed at AC vs laser directed away from AC (N = 13 PV::ArchT mice) | Correlation coefficient | p = 0.901, r = 0.0383 |

8E | Sampling time (ms) | Without laser presentation vs with laser presentation (N = 10 SOM::ArchT mice) | Wilcoxon signed-rank test | p = 0.0050, T = 0 |

8F | Laser-induced change in sampling time (ms) | Laser directed at AC vs laser directed away from AC (N = 10 SOM::ArchT mice) | Correlation coefficient | p = 0.901, r = 0.0453 |

8G | Time to reward (ms) | Without laser presentation vs with laser presentation (N = 10 SOM::ArchT mice) | Wilcoxon signed-rank test | p = 0.203, T = 15 |

8H | Laser-induced change in time to reward (ms) | Laser directed at AC vs laser directed away from AC (N = 10 SOM::ArchT mice) | Correlation coefficient | p = 0.470, r = 0.259 |