Table 1

Statistical table 1

#FigureDescriptionData structureType of testStatistical valuesSignificanceEffect size
11D, leftValenceNormality not assumedOne-way Friedman’s testχ2 = 38.000p < 0.001-
21D, leftValence (neu vs pos)Normality not assumedPost hoc Wilcoxon signed-rank testZ = −2.803p corrected = 0.051r = −0.886
3Valence (neu vs ero)Z = −2.803p corrected = 0.051r = −0.886
4Valence (neu vs mut)Z = 2.803p corrected = 0.046r = 0.886
5Valence (neu vs hor)Z = 2.803p corrected = 0.041r = 0.886
6Valence (pos vs ero)Z = 1.886p corrected = 0.119r = 0.596
7Valence (pos vs mut)Z = 2.803p corrected = 0.035r = 0.886
8Valence (pos vs hor)Z = 2.803p corrected = 0.030r = 0.886
9Valence (ero vs mut)Z = 2.803p corrected = 0.025r = 0.886
10Valence (ero vs hor)Z = 2.803p corrected = 0.020r = 0.886
11Valence (mut vs hor)Z = −1.580p corrected = 0.119r = −0.500
121D, rightArousalNormality not assumedOne-way Friedman’s testχ2 = 29.760p < 0.001-
131D, rightArousal (neu vs pos)Normality not assumedPost hoc Wilcoxon signed-rank testZ = −2.803p corrected = 0.051r = −0.886
14Arousal (neu vs ero)Z = −2.803p corrected = 0.051r = −0.886
15Arousal (neu vs mut)Z = −2.803p corrected = 0.046r = −0.886
16Arousal (neu vs hor)Z = −2.803p corrected = 0.041r = −0.886
17Arousal (pos vs ero)Z = −2.192p corrected = 0.124r = −0.693
18Arousal (pos vs mut)Z = −2.497p corrected = 0.075r = −0.790
19Arousal (pos vs hor)Z = −2.244p corrected = 0.124r = −0.710
20Arousal (ero vs mut)Z = −1.478p corrected = 0.418r = −0.467
21Arousal (ero vs hor)Z = −1.172p corrected = 0.482r = −0.371
22Arousal (mut vs hor)Z = 0.459p corrected = 0.647r = 0.145