Statistical table
| Data type | Compared groups | Test | Results | df | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1-score (%); Fig. 2 | Final vs no refin., no cluster, no size thr. | Repeated-measures ANOVA | F = 40.33 | 3 | |
| Data type | Compared groups | Test | Confidence level | df | |
| 95% | Bonferroni corr. | ||||
| F1-score (%); Fig. 2 | Final vs no refin. | Paired t test | 10.44% to 19.36% | 9.18% to 20.62% | 10 |
| F1-score (%); Fig. 2 | Final vs no cluster | Paired t test | 0.60% to 1.90% | 0.41% to 2.08% | 10 |
| F1-score (%); Fig. 2 | Final vs no size thr. | Paired t test | 2.34% to 4.15% | 2.08% to 4.41% | 10 |
| F1-score (%), acute slices; Fig. 3 | Algorithm vs humans | Paired t test | −5.67% to −2.25% | - | 10 |
| F1-score (%), Cry. fix. n.c.; Fig. 3 | Algorithm vs humans | Paired t test | −16.89% to −4.15% | - | 6 |
| F1-score (%), Che. fix. n.c.; Fig. 3 | Algorithm vs humans | Paired t test | −8.10% to −3.45% | - | 8 |
| F1-score (%), acute slices | Algorithm vs ilastik | Paired t test | 16.20% to 29.27% | - | 10 |
| F1-score (%), Cry. fix. n.c. | Algorithm vs ilastik | Paired t test | 12.42% to 24.89% | - | 6 |
| F1-score (%), Che. fix. n.c. | Algorithm vs ilastik | Paired t test | 6.46% to 27.01% | - | 8 |
| Vesicle count; Fig. 6 | Algorithm vs humans | Pearson corr. | 0.7288 to 0.9494 | - | 42 |
| Vesicle nnd; Fig. 6 | Algorithm vs humans | Pearson corr. | 0.2838 to 0.8309 | - | 42 |
| Vesicle area; Fig. 6 | Algorithm vs humans | Pearson corr. | 0.4979 to 0.8949 | - | 42 |