Evaluation of the performance of ilastik and comparison with our model
| Data | Precision (ilastik) | Recall (ilastik) | F1-score (ilastik) | F1-score (alg.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acute slices | 50.60 ± 3.19%, n = 11 | 66.92 ± 4.60%, n = 11 | 56.89 ± 3.36%, n = 11 | 79.63 ± 1.11%, n = 11 |
| Cryo-fixed n.c. | 63.30 ± 4.52%, n = 7 | 62.62 ± 2.45%, n = 7 | 62.16 ± 2.25%, n = 7 | 80.82 ± 2.38%, n = 7 |
| Chemically-fixed n.c. | 74.15 ± 3.24%, n = 9 | 71.24 ± 5.97%, n = 9 | 70.48 ± 4.14%, n = 9 | 87.22 ± 1.37%, n = 9 |
Performance of ilastik (precision, recall, and F1-score) on the same images used in Table 3 (dataset test final) and F1-score obtained with our model. Data are presented as mean ± SEM.