Table 1

Statistical table

FigureData structureType of testSample sizeStatistical data
Figure 1BOne tailedUnpaired t testsiNEG: 3 experimental replicates
siA1#1: 3 experimental replicates
siA1#2: 3 experimental replicates
siA1#3: 3 experimental replicates
siA1#4: 3 experimental replicates		siNEG vs siA1#1 p = 0.1471, t = 1.206, df = 4; siNEG vs siA1#2 p = 0.0277, t = 2.678, df = 4; siNEG vs siA1#3 p = 0.0041, t = 4.871, df = 4; siNEG vs siA1#4 p = 0.0011, t = 6.929, df = 4.
Figure 1EOne tailedUnpaired t testsiNEG: 3 experimental replicates
siA1: 3 experimental replicates		p = 0.0005, t = 8.435, df = 4, 95% CI = −1.057 to −0.5336, r2 = 0.9468, difference between means ± SEM = −0.7954 ± 0.09429
Figure 1GOne tailedUnpaired t testsiNEG: 3 experimental replicates with over 30 cells analyzed per replicate
siA1: 3 experimental replicates with over 30 cells analyzed per replicate		p < 0.0001, t = 10.50, df = 193, 95% CI = −27493 to −18797, r2 = 0.3635, difference between means ± SEM = −23145 ± 2205
Figure 4BOne tailedUnpaired t testsiNEG: 3 experimental replicates with over 90 cells analyzed in total
Severe siA1: 3 experimental replicates with 20 cells analyzed in total		p = 0.0002, t = 3.644, df = 116, 95% CI = −2.890 to −0.8547, r2 = 0.1027, difference between the means ± SEM = −1.872 ± 0.5139
Figure 4DOne tailedUnpaired t testsiNEG: 3 experimental replicates with over 90 cells analyzed in total
Severe siA1: 3 experimental replicates with 20 cells analyzed in total		p = 0.0002, t = 3.671, df = 116, 95% CI = −62.74 to −18.76, r2 = 0.1041, difference between the means ± SEM = −40.75 ± 11.10
Figure 4FOne tailedUnpaired t testsiNEG: 3 experimental replicates
siA1: 3 experimental replicates		p = 0.0221, t = 2.900, df = 4,
95% CI = 0.1822–8.404, r2 = 0.6776
Figure 5BOne tailedUnpaired t testsiNEG: 3 experimental replicates with over 290 cells analyzed in total
Severe siA1: 3 experimental replicates with 141 cells analyzed in total		p < 0.0001, t = 7.480, df = 437, 95% CI = −2.641 to −1.542, r2 = 0.1135, difference between the means ± SEM = −2.091 ± 0.2796
Figure 5COne tailedPC testsiA1: analyzed 300 cells for their hnRNP A1 fluorescence and SG number; each dot represents a single cellp < 0.0001, r = 0.2825, r2 = 0.07982, 95% CI = 0.1749–0.3835
Figure 5DOne tailedUnpaired t testsiNEG: 3 experimental replicates with over 290 cells analyzed in total
siA1: 3 experimental replicates with 141 cells analyzed in total		p < 0.0001, t = 6.494, df = 443, 95% CI = −0.5998 to −0.3211, r2 = 0.08691, difference between the means ± SEM = −0.4605 ± 0.07091