Table 1

Statistics

Figure
number
Data
structure
Type of testStatistics
Figure 2DNon-normalMann–Whitney U testp = 0.0219 for differences in dendritic length between wild type and mutants
Figure 2ENon-normalMann–Whitney U testp = 0.0420 for differences in soma volume between wild type and mutants
Figure 2FNormalt testp = 0.679 for differences in soma volume of homologs between wild type and mutants
Figure 3C-χ2 testp = 6.5630e-09 and p = 6.2760e-15 for differences in contralateral tail bend between wild type and mutants and heterozygotes and mutants, respectively
Figure 3C-χ2 testp =5.0549e-08 and p = 2.2116e-12 for differences in no tail bend responses between wild type and mutants and heterozygotes and mutants, respectively
Figure 3C-χ2 testp = 2.2687e-06 and p = 0.0026 for differences in ipsilateral tail bend responses in wild type and mutant and heterozygotes and mutants, respectively
Figure 3ENon-normalKruskal–Wallis; Mann–Whitney for between group comparisonsp = 1.0831e-06; p = 2.5258e-05 for differences in latencies between wild type and mutants, p = 8.7877e-06 for differences between heterozygotes and mutants.
Figure 3FNon-normalKruskal–Wallis; Mann–Whitney for between group comparisonsp = 0.0004; p = 0.0010 for differences in latencies between wild type and mutants, p = 0.0010 for differences between heterozygotes and mutants
Figure 3GNon-normalKruskal–Wallis; Mann–Whitney for between group comparisonsp = 0.0004; p = 6.3799e-04 for differences in CV of latencies between wild type and mutants, p = 5.7969e-04 for differences in CV between heterozygote and mutants
Figure 3HNon-normalKruskal–Wallis; Mann–Whitney for between group comparisonsp = 0.0413; p = 0.9107 for differences in tail bend angle between wild type and mutants, p = 0.01 for differences between heterozygotes and mutants
Figure 4C-χ2 testp = 0.0111 for differences in contralateral tail bend responses between wild type and mutants
Figure 4C-χ2 testp = 1.4745e-06 for differences in no tail bend responses between wild type and mutants
Figure 4C-χ2 testp = 0.3513 for differences in ipsilateral tail bend responses between wild type and mutants
Figure 4DNormalt testp = 0.0044 for differences in Cumulative Density Function of latencies between wild type and mutants
Figure 4ENormalt testp = 0.0676 for differences in CV of latencies between wild type and mutants
Figure 4FNormalt testp = 0.0625 for differences in tail bend angle between wild type and mutants
Figure 5DNon-normalMann–Whitney U testp = 0.0079 for differences in probability of calcium activity in M-cell between wild type and mutants
Figure 5ENon-normalMann–Whitney U testp = 1.4939e-13 for differences in peak ΔF/F between wild type and mutants
Figure 5FNon-normalMann–Whitney U testp = 0.119 for differences in CV in ΔF/F between wild type and mutants
Figure 6DNon-normalMann–Whitney U testp = 0.0196 for differences in threshold between wild type and mutants
Figure 6GNon-normalMann–Whitney U testp = 2.8355e-04 for differences in peak ΔF/F between wild type and mutants
Figure 6HNon-normalWilcoxon signed-rank testp = 1 for before and after comparison for WT, p = 0.5 for before and after comparison for mutants
Figure 6INormalt testp = 0.1596 for before and after comparison for WT, p = 0.6467 for before and after comparison for mutants