Table 2

Estimation statistics table showing effect size (unpaired means difference) with 95% CIs and permutation tests p values as follows: effect size [CI width with lower bound, upper bound]

FigurePanelMeasureGroups (sample size)Effect size [CI width]Permutation p value
1EEffect of secretory IgM on the % area of IgG deposition at 2 weeks in select sections (−1200, −600, 600 μm).KO
(4 mice, 3 sections each)
31.6 [95%CI 18.6, 43.4]0.0108
WT
(5 mice, 3 sections each)
FEffect of secretory IgM on the % area of IgG and C3b co-localization at 2 weeks in select sections (−1200, −600, 600 μm).KO
(4 mice, 3 sections each)
14.9 [95%CI 5.07, 23.4]0.03
WT
(5 mice, 3 sections each)
GEffect of secretory IgM on the % area of C3b deposition at 2 weeks in select sections (−1200, −600, 600 μm).KO
(4 mice, 3 sections each)
12.5 [95%CI 1.48, 23.1]0.116
WT
(5 mice, 3 sections each)
HEffects of secretory IgM on levels of serum IgG immunoglobulinKO:
BSL (9), 2 weeks (5), 10 weeks (7) mice
KO-2-SCI minus KO-BSL:
6.09 [95%CI 3.51, 8.99]
0.0004
KO-10-SCI minus KO-BSL:
4.62 [95%CI 1.95, 8.39]
0.004
WT:
BSL (10), 2 weeks (6), 10 weeks (6) mice
WT-2-SCI minus WT-BSL:
9.36 [95%CI 4.02, 14.6]
0.0016
WT-10-SCI minus WT-BSL:
3.96 [95%CI 0.703, 7.71]
0.0228
ILevels of serum IgM immunoglobulin in WT mice at BSL (pre-SCI) and 2 weeks post-SCIWT:
BSL (6), 2 weeks (7) mice
0.256 [95%CI 0.1, 0.416]0.0146
3EEffect of secretory IgM on expansion of myelin engulfing macrophages in spinal cord sections with largest IgG deposition.KO
(4 mice, 3 sections each)
4.24 [95%CI 1.07, 7.19]0.0246
WT (5 mice, 3 sections each)
5AEffect of secretory IgM on BMS scores at 2 weeks post-SCIKO (7), WT (7) mice−0.286 [95%CI −1.86, 0.643]0.575
Effect of secretory IgM on grip strength at 2 weeks post-SCIKO (7), WT (7) mice3.74 [95%CI −6.4, 13.3]0.485
5CEffect of secretory IgM on step sequence regularity at 4, 8, and 10 weeks post-SCI4 weeks:
KO SCI (10),
KO sham (10),
WT SCI (7),
WT sham (10) mice
KO SCI vs WT SCI
−3.95 [95%CI −23.1, 16.8]
0.739
8 weeks:
KO SCI (10),
KO sham (8),
WT SCI (7),
WT sham (9) mice
KO SCI vs WT SCI
−22.5 [95%CI −38.6, −8.21]
0.0196
10 weeks:
KO SCI (7),
KO sham (8),
WT SCI (6),
WT sham (8) mice
KO SCI vs WT SCI
31.4 [95.0%CI −49.4, −12.2]
0.0188
DEffect of secretory IgM on hindlimb swing speed at 4, 8, and 10 weeks post-SCI4 weeks:
KO SCI (10),
KO sham (10),
WT SCI (7),
WT sham (10) mice
KO SCI vs WT SCI
−7.22 [95%CI −20.9, 4.97]
0.358
8 weeks:
KO SCI (12),
KO sham (8),
WT SCI (7),
WT sham (9) mice
KO SCI vs WT SCI
−16.1 [95%CI −34.6, −4.95]
0.0598
10 weeks:
KO SCI (9),
KO sham (8),
WT SCI (6),
WT sham (8) mice
KO SCI vs WT SCI
−18.2 [95%CI −32.9, −3.69]
0.0412
EEffect of secretory IgM on forelimb swing speed at 4, 8, and 10 weeks post-SCI4 weeks:
KO SCI (10),
KO sham (10),
WT SCI (7),
WT sham (10) mice
KO SCI vs WT SCI
0.859 [95%CI −11.3, 12.7]
0.896
8 weeks:
KO SCI (12),
KO sham (8),
WT SCI (7),
WT sham (9) mice
KO SCI vs WT SCI
−0.507 [95%CI −8.66, 9.56]
0.925
10 weeks:
KO SCI (9),
KO sham (8),
WT SCI (6),
WT sham (8) mice
KO SCI vs WT SCI
−4.87 [95.0%CI −20.5, 7.37]
0.524
FEffect of secretory IgM on hindlimb print area at 4, 8, and 10 weeks post-SCI4 weeks:
KO SCI (10),
KO sham (10),
WT SCI (7),
WT sham (10) mice
KO SCI vs WT SCI
−0.0616 [95%CI −0.175, 0.08]
0.425
8 weeks:
KO SCI (12),
KO sham (8),
WT SCI (7),
WT sham (9) mice
KO SCI vs WT SCI
−0.037[95%CI −0.0826, 0.024]
0.289.
5FEffect of secretory IgM on hindlimb print area at 4, 8, and 10 weeks post-SCI10 weeks:
KO SCI (9),
KO sham (8),
WT SCI (6),
WT sham (8) mice
KO SCI vs WT SCI
−0.096 [95%CI −0.137, −0.0501]
0.0006
GEffect of secretory IgM on forelimb print area at 4, 8, and 10 weeks post-SCI4 weeks:
KO SCI (10),
KO sham (10),
WT SCI (7),
WT sham (10) mice
KO SCI vs WT SCI
−0.0352 [95%CI −0.115, 0.0438]
0.43
8 weeks:
KO SCI (12),
KO sham (8),
WT SCI (7),
WT sham (9) mice
KO SCI vs WT SCI
0.0192 [95%CI −0.0109, 0.055]
0.352
10 weeks:
KO SCI (9),
KO sham (8),
WT SCI (6),
WT sham (8) mice
KO SCI vs WT SCI
−0.023 [95%CI −0.0664, 0.0159]
0.35
HEffect of secretory IgM on average body speed at 4, 8, and 10 weeks post-SCI4 weeks:
KO SCI (10),
KO sham (10),
WT SCI (7),
WT sham (10) mice
KO SCI vs WT SCI
2.39 [95%CI −2.51, 8.17]
0.424
8 weeks:
KO SCI (12),
KO sham (8),
WT SCI (7),
WT sham (9) mice
KO SCI vs WT SCI
−3.52 [95%CI −7.53, 1.42]
0.171
10 weeks:
KO SCI (9),
KO sham (8),
WT SCI (6),
WT sham (8) mice
KO SCI vs WT SCI
−2.31 [95%CI −8.24, 3.55]
0.49
6BEffect of secretory IgM on bacterial load in bladder at 2 weeks post-SCIKO (7), WT (7) mice0.429 [95%CI 0.0, 1.29]0
CEffect of secretory IgM on bacterial load in colon at 2 weeks post-SCIKO (7), WT (6) mice
Upon log-transformation:
KO (5), WT (6) mice
1.29e+02 [95%CI −2.01e+02, 7e+02]0.877
DEffect of secretory IgM on body weight at 2 weeks post-SCIKO (7), WT (7) mice−1.54 [95%CI −7.52, 3.85]0.617
EEffect of secretory IgM on spleen weight at 2 weeks post-SCIKO (7), WT (7) mice0.005 [95%CI −0.0206, 0.0272]0.686
  • p values for permutation tests <0.05 are shown in bold for emphasis.