Statistical summary table
| Comparison | Figure | Test | Statistic | p value | Multiple comparison procedure |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DS-evoked firing vs NS-evoked firing | 1F | Wilcoxon | V = 18013 | p < 0.0001 | None |
| DS-evoked firing: behavioral response vs no response | n/a | Wilcoxon | V = 11007 | p < 0.0001 | None |
| Large model, overall firing window tests for IDR firing difference from 0 | |||||
| Maximum radial velocity | 3A,B | t | 2.53 | p = 0.13 | Holm |
| Move duration | 3A | t | 1.33 | p = 0.19 | Holm |
| SD of angular velocity | 3A | t | 0.43 | p = 0.67 | Holm |
| Path efficiency | 3A,B | t | 2.61 | p = 0.10 | Holm |
| Net Δ in heading | 3A | t | 1.67 | p = 0.10 | Holm |
| Turn efficiency | 3A | t | 0.50 | p = 0.62 | Holm |
| Latency to move | 3A | t | −1.40 | p = 0.17 | Holm |
| Distance from lever | 3A,B | t | −1.37 | p = 0.17 | Holm |
| Time since reward | 3A | t | −0.96 | p = 0.34 | Holm |
| Time since cue | 3A | t | 1.60 | p = 0.11 | Holm |
| Large model, early firing window tests for IDR firing difference from 0 | |||||
| Maximum radial velocity | 3C,D | t | 1.75 | p = 0.084 | Holm |
| Move duration | 3C | t | 1.95 | p = 0.054 | Holm |
| SD of angular velocity | 3C | t | 0.92 | p = 0.36 | Holm |
| Path efficiency | 3C,D | t | 3.48 | p = 0.00075 | Holm |
| Net Δ in heading | 3C | t | 1.56 | p = 0.12 | Holm |
| Turn efficiency | 3C | t | −0.76 | p = 0.45 | Holm |
| Latency to move | 3C | t | −1.52 | p = 0.13 | Holm |
| Distance from lever | 3C,D | t | 0.65 | p = 0.52 | Holm |
| Time since reward | 3C | t | −0.35 | p = 0.73 | Holm |
| Time since cue | 3C | t | 0.71 | p = 0.48 | Holm |
| Large model, late firing window tests for IDR firing difference from 0 | |||||
| Maximum radial velocity | 3E,F | t | 3.48 | p = 0.00075 | Holm |
| Move duration | 3E | t | 1.00 | p = 0.32 | Holm |
| SD of angular velocity | 3E | t | 0.64 | p = 0.52 | Holm |
| Path efficiency | 3E,F | t | 0.75 | p = 0.45 | Holm |
| Net Δ in heading | 3E | t | 1.38 | p = 0.17 | Holm |
| Turn efficiency | 3E | t | 2.74 | p = 0.0074 | Holm |
| Latency to move | 3E | t | 0.27 | p = 0.79 | Holm |
| Distance from lever | 3E,F | t | −3.66 | p = 0.00042 | Holm |
| Time since reward | 3A | t | 0.62 | p = 0.54 | Holm |
| Time since cue | 3A | t | 1.27 | p = 0.21 | Holm |
| Comparison of IDR firing response across rats | |||||
| Path efficiency, early excitation window | 5A | ANOVA | F = 0.8727 | p = 0.458 | |
| Maximum radial velocity, late excitation window | 5B | ANOVA | F = 0.32 | p = 0.812 | |
| Lever distance, late excitation window | 5C | ANOVA | F = 6.84 | p = 0.0003 | |
| Focused model, overall firing window tests for IDR firing difference from 0 | |||||
| Maximum radial velocity | 6A,B | t | 2.18 | p = 0.032 | Holm |
| Path efficiency | 6A,B | t | 2.22 | p = 0.029 | Holm |
| Distance from lever | 6A,B | t | −1.64 | p = 0.10 | Holm |
| Focused model, early firing window tests for IDR firing difference from 0 | |||||
| Maximum radial velocity | 6C,D | t | 1.24 | p = 0.22 | Holm |
| Path efficiency | 6C,D | t | 3.26 | p = 0.0015 | Holm |
| Distance from lever | 6C,D | t | 0.46 | p = 0.65 | Holm |
| Focused model, late firing window tests for IDR firing difference from 0 | |||||
| Maximum radial velocity | 6E,F | t | 2.42 | p = 0.017 | Holm |
| Path efficiency | 6E,F | t | 0.69 | p = 0.49 | Holm |
| Distance from lever | 6E,F | t | −4.33 | p = 0.000037 | Holm |
| Regression of Q2 vs Q1 early firing Z scores for no infusion | |||||
| Intercept | 8F | t | 0.62 | p = 0.54 | None |
| Slope | 8F | t | 9.89 | p = 3.59 × 10−13 | None |
| Slope vs 1 | 8F | t | −1.03 | p = 0.31 | None |
| Regression of Q2 vs Q1 early firing Z scores for bilateral vehicle | |||||
| Intercept | 8G | t | 0.36 | p = 0.72 | None |
| Slope | 8G | t | 4.50 | p = 0.00022 | None |
| Slope vs 1 | 8G | t | −0.07 | p = 0.945 | None |
| Regression of Q2 vs Q1 early firing Z scores for contralateral SCH-23390 | |||||
| Intercept | 8H | t | 0.108 | p = 0.915 | None |
| Slope | 8H | t | 5.92 | p = 4.87e-6 | None |
| Slope vs 1 | 8H | t | 0.35 | p = 0.73 | None |
| Regression of Q2 vs Q1 early firing Z scores for ipsilateral SCH-23390 | |||||
| Intercept | 8I | t | t = 1.23 | p = 0.23 | None |
| Slope | 8I | t | t = 5.81 | p = 2.68e-6 | None |
| Slope vs 1 | 8I | t | −1.12 | p = 0.27 | None |
| Regression of Q2 vs Q1 early firing Z scores for bilateral SCH-23390 | |||||
| Intercept | 8J | t | −0.04 | p = 0.97 | None |
| Slope | 8J | t | 3.79 | p = 0.0016 | None |
| Slope vs 1 | 8J | t | −8.37 | p = 3.09e-7 | None |
| Regression of Q2 vs Q1 late firing Z scores for no infusion | |||||
| Intercept | 8K | t | 0.28 | p = 0.78 | None |
| Slope | 8K | t | 10.71 | p = 2.53e-14 | None |
| Slope vs 1 | 8K | t | −1.25 | p = 0.22 | None |
| Regression of Q2 vs Q1 late firing Z scores for bilateral vehicle | |||||
| Intercept | 8L | t | 0.79 | p = 0.44 | None |
| Slope | 8L | t | 8.44 | p = 5.08e-8 | None |
| Slope vs 1 | 8L | t | −0.18 | p = 0.857 | None |
| Regression of Q2 vs Q1 late firing Z scores for contralateral SCH-23390 | |||||
| Intercept | 8M | t | 0.51 | p = 0.61 | None |
| Slope | 8M | t | 6.41 | p = 1.53e-6 | None |
| Slope vs 1 | 8M | t | −2.36 | p = 0.027 | None |
| Regression of Q2 vs Q1 late firing Z scores for ipsilateral SCH-23390 | |||||
| Intercept | 8N | t | 0.80 | p = 0.43 | None |
| Slope | 8N | t | 8.16 | p = 5.37e-9 | None |
| Slope vs 1 | 8N | t | −1.10 | p = 0.28 | None |
| Regression of Q2 vs Q1 late firing Z scores for bilateral SCH-23390 | |||||
| Intercept | 8O | t | −1.60 | p = 0.13 | None |
| Slope | 8O | t | 5.72 | p = 3.17e-5 | None |
| Slope vs 1 | 8O | t | −8.61 | p = 2.13e-7 | None |
List of statistical comparisons and results.