Table 1

Statistical table

AnalysisFigureData structureType of testVariablesObserved power
Experiment 1, SNR task2AAssumed normalOne-way repeated-
measures ANOVA
Independent: stimulus condition
Dependent: depth threshold
0.843
Experiment 1, feature task2BAssumed normalOne-way repeated-
measures ANOVA
Independent: stimulus condition
Dependent: depth threshold
0.722
Experiment 2, behavior2DAssumed normalOne-way repeated-
measures ANOVA
Independent: stimulus condition
Dependent: depth threshold
0.610
Experiment 2, GLM3Assumed normalThree-way repeated-
measures ANOVA
Independent: hemisphere
Stimulus condition
ROI
Dependent: GLM β-weight
0.580
0.372
>0.999
Experiment 2, MVPA4Assumed normalOne-sample t testSVM accuracy against baseline
Upright face vs random
shape classification
V10.690
V2>0.999
V30.972
V3A0.744
V3B0.422
V70.919
hMT+0.703
V40.880
LO0.905
FFA0.762
Inverted face vs random
shape classification
V10.959
V20.997
V30.639
V3A0.999
V3B0.479
V70.998
hMT+0.175
V40.999
LO0.764
FFA0.396
Upright face vs inverted
face classification
V10.437
V20.418
V30.064
V3A0.999
V3B0.875
V70.504
hMT+0.088
V40.903
LO0.540
FFA0.838
Experiment 2, MVPA-
behavior correlation
4Assumed normalPearson correlationVariable 1: Threshold difference
Variable 2: SVM accuracy
Upright face vs random shape
V10.050
V20.378
V30.288
V3A0.071
V3B0.055
V70.074
hMT+0.051
V40.690
LO0.258
FFA0.075
Inverted face vs random shape
V10.312
V20.087
V30.087
V3A0.579
V3B0.117
V70.342
hMT+0.053
V40.053
LO0.075
FFA0.072
Upright face vs inverted face
V10.533
V20.449
V30.984
V3A0.058
V3B0.353
V70.250
hMT+0.202
V40.488
LO0.193
FFA0.544
Upright face vs non-upright-face
V10.057
V20.129
V30.170
V3A0.060
V3B0.110
V70.065
hMT+0.061
V40.121
LO0.064
FFA0.562