Table 1

Summary data and statistical analysis for Figures 1-13

FiguresValuesStatistical tests
Figure 1
ControlPyr:Kcnq2
1BCA3Duration1.6 ± 0.46 s2.2 ± 0.35 sMann–Whitney U testp = 0.26Control: n = 10; Pyr:Kcnq2: n = 18 hemispheres
Events/s0.0054 ± 0.00150.013 ± 0.0025Mann–Whitney U testp = 0.0143Control: n = 22; Pyr:Kcnq2: n = 21 hemispheres
Posterior cortexDuration1.15 ± 0.24 s5.3 ± 0.61 sMann–Whitney U testp < 0.0001Control: n = 15; Pyr:Kcnq2: n = 20 hemispheres
Events/s0.008 ± 0.0018 Hz0.015 ± 0.0018 HzMann–Whitney U testp = 0.0039Control: n = 22; Pyr:Kcnq2: n = 20 hemispheres
Animals: Control: n = 6; Pyr:Kcnq2: n = 6.
1CCA3APs vs current injectionsTwo-way ANOVA(p = 0.0025;
F(9,33) = 3.745)
Control: n = 5; pPyr:Kcnq2: n = 6 cells
Figure 2
ControlPyr:Kcnq2Statistical tests and values
2CCA3Amplitude0.064 ± 0.007 △F/F0.14 ± 0.014 △F/FMann–Whitney U testp < 0.0001Control: n = 46; Pyr:Kcnq2: n = 56 hemispheres
Duration1.4 ± 0.18 s8.5 ± 0.68 sMann–Whitney U testp < 0.0001
Events/s0.26 ± 0.023 Hz0.043 ± 0.0047 HzMann–Whitney U testp < 0.0001
Posterior cortex (PC)Amplitude0.08 ± 0.006 △F/F0.29 ± 0.023 △F/FMann–Whitney U testp < 0.0001Control: n = 44; Pyr:Kcnq2: n = 56 hemispheres
Duration2.2 ± 0.19 s6.5 ± 0.37 sMann–Whitney U testp < 0.0001
Events/s0.14 ± 0.0072 Hz0.048 ± 0.0032 HzMann–Whitney U testp < 0.0001
Medial cortex (MC)Amplitude0.021 ± 0.01 △F/F0.33 ± 0.029 △F/FMann–Whitney U testp < 0.0001Control, n = 43; Pyr:Kcnq2: n = 55 hemispheres
Duration1.4 ± 0.58 s9.5 ± 0.56 sMann–Whitney U testp < 0.0001
Events/s0.0065 ± 0.0024 Hz0.018 ± 0.0023 HzMann–Whitney U test
Anterior cortex (AC)Amplitude0.02 ± 0.003 △F/F0.36 ± 0.03 △F/FMann–Whitney U testp < 0.0001Control: n = 44; Pyr:Kcnq2: n = 54 hemispheres
Duration1.5 ± 0.3 s11.2 ± 0.8 sMann–Whitney U testp < 0.0001
Events/s0.012 ± 0.0021 Hz0.021 ± 0.0025 HzMann–Whitney U testp = 0.0005
Data were obtained from 8 control and 9 Pyr:Kcnq2 mice.
Figure 3
ControlPyr:Kcnq2Statistical tests and values
3CPower 0.02–0.2 Hz0.022 ± 0.0015 A.U.0.11 ± 0.0046 A.U.Mann–Whitney U testp < 0.0001Control, n = 43; Pyr:Kcnq2:, n = 47 hemispheres
Power 0.2–2 Hz0.026 ± 0.011 A.U.0.38 ± 0.012A.U.Mann–Whitney U testp < 0.0001
3DROI 0.02–0.2 Hz10.1 ± 0.7 ROIs19.9 ± 0.7 ROIsMann–Whitney U testp < 0.0001Control, n = 43; Pyr:Kcnq2:, n = 47 hemispheres
ROI 0.2–2 Hz6.6 ± 0.5 ROIs0.5 ± 0.2 ROIsMann–Whitney U testp < 0.0001
Data were obtained from 8 control and 9 Pyr:Kcnq2 mice.
Figure 4
ControlPyr:Kcnq2Statistical tests and values
4CCA3Amplitude–PTX 0.057 △F/F ± 0.055 SD–PTX 0.08 △F/F ± 0.09 SDMann–Whitney U testControl
p < 0.0001
Control: –PTX: n = 1547; +PTX: n = 1322 events
Pyr:Kcnq2: –PTX: n = 224 events ; +PTX: n = 523 events
+PTX 0.27 △F/F ± 0.12 SD+PTX 0.19 △F/F ± 0.09 SDMann–Whitney U testPyr:Kcnq2
p < 0.0001
Duration–PTX 0.8 s ± 1.5 SD–PTX 4.3 s ± 5.4 SDMann–Whitney U testControl
p < 0.0001
+PTX 0.7 ± 1.7 SD+PTX 1.8 ± 3.8 SDMann–Whitney U testPyr:Kcnq2
p < 0.0001
Posterior cortexAmplitude–PTX 0.08 △F/F ± 0.058 SD–PTX 0.21 △F/F ± 0.26 SDMann–Whitney U testControl
p < 0.0001
Control: –PTX: n = 931; +PTX: n = 777 events
Pyr:Kcnq2: –PTX: n = 223; +PTX: n = 444 events
+PTX 0.43 △F/F ± 0.20 SD+PTX 0.38 △F/F ± 0.24 SDMann–Whitney U testPyr:Kcnq2
p < 0.0001
Duration–PTX 1.9 s ± 2.4 SD–PTX 5.1 s ± 4.5 SDMann–Whitney U testControl
p < 0.0001
+PTX 0.58 s ± 1.0 SD+PTX 1.5 ± 1.9 SDMann–Whitney U testPyr:Kcnq2
p < 0.0001
Medial cortexAmplitude–PTX 0.053 △F/F ± 0.066 SD–PTX 0.21 △F/F ± 0.25 SDMann–Whitney U testControl
p < 0.0001
Control: –PTX: n = 94; +PTX: n = 270 events
Pyr:Kcnq2: –PTX: n = 62; +PTX: n = 267 events
+PTX 0.13 △F/F ± 0.22 SD+PTX 0.27 △F/F ± 0.24 SDMann–Whitney U testPyr:Kcnq2
p = 0.0003
Duration–PTX 0.9 s ± 0.74 SD–PTX 7.8 s ± 6.7 SDMann–Whitney U testControl
p < 0.0034
+PTX 1.3 s ± 2.3 SD+PTX 2.1 ± 3.3 SDMann–Whitney U testPyr:Kcnq2
p < 0.0001
Anterior cortexAmplitude–PTX 0.048 △F/F ± 0.038 SD–PTX 0.16 △F/F ± 0.26 SDMann–Whitney U testControl: p < 0.0001Control: –PTX: n = 125; +PTX: n = 310 events
Pyr:Kcnq2: –PTX: n = 150; +PTX: n = 66 events
+PTX 0.14 △F/F ± 0.1 SD+PTX 0.37 △F/F ± 0.31 SDMann–Whitney U testPyr:Kcnq2
p < 0.0001
Duration–PTX 1.0 s ± 1.3 SD–PTX 4.8 s ± 6.1 SDMann–Whitney U testControl
p = 0.11
+PTX 0.8 s ± 0.9 SD+PTX 5.3 ± 7.1 SDMann–Whitney U testPyr:Kcnq2
p = 0.87
Data were obtained from 3 control and 3 Pyr:Kcnq2 mice.
Figure 5
ControlPyr:Kcnq2Statistical tests and values
5CPower 0.02–0.2 Hz–PTX 0.02 ± 0.003 A.U.–PTX 0.11 ± 0.01 A.U.Control
Wilcoxon paired test
Control
p < 0.0001
Control: n = 20; Pyr:Kcnq2: n = 14 hemispheres
+PTX 0.06 ± 0.007 A.U.+PTX 0.18 ± 0.01 A.U.Pyr:Kcnq2
paired Student’s t test
p < 0.0001
t = 6.233, df = 13
Power 0.2–2 Hz–PTX 0.28 ± 0.02 A.U.–PTX 0.37 ± 0.02 A.U.Control
Wilcoxon paired
Control
p < 0.0001
Control: n = 20;
Pyr:Kcnq2: n = 14 hemispheres
+PTX 0.58 ± 0.03 A.U.+PTX 0.73 ± 0.0 A.U.6Pyr:Kcnq2
Wilcoxon paired test
Pyr:Kcnq2
p < 0.0001
5DROI 0.02–0.2 Hz–PTX 8.8 ± 0.7 ROIs–PTX 23.0 ± 1.4 ROIsControl
paired Student’s t test
Control
p = 0.84 t = 0.2042,
df = 19
Control: n = 20; Pyr:Kcnq2: n = 14 hemispheres
+PTX 9.1 ± 1.1 ROIs+PTX 25.2 ± 1.4 ROIsPyr:Kcnq2
paired Student’s t test
Pyr:Kcnq2
p = 0.19 t = 1.377,
df = 13
ROI 0.2–2 Hz–PTX 7.6 ± 0.6 ROIs–PTX 0 ROIControl
Wilcoxon paired test
Control
p = 0.72
Control: n = 20; Pyr:Kcnq2: n = 14 hemispheres
+PTX 8.7 ± 1.6 ROIs+PTX 0 ROIPyr:Kcnq2
N/A
N/A
Data were obtained from 4 control and 3 Pyr:Kcnq2 mice.
Figure 6
ControlPyr:Kcnq2Statistical tests and values
6CCA3Amplitude–D-APV 0.070 △F/F ± 0.069 SD–D-APV 0.13 △F/F ± 0.14 SDMann–Whitney U testControl: p < 0.0001Control: –D-APV n = 1265; +D-APV: n = 571 events
Pyr:Kcnq2: –D-APV n = 193; +D-APV: n = 156 events
+D-APV 0.036 △F/F ± 0.014 SD+D-APV 0.09 △F/F ± 0.1 SDMann–Whitney U testPyr:Kcnq2: p < 0.0001
Duration–D-APV 0.88 s ± 2.0 SD–D-APV 5.4 s ± 5.8 SDMann–Whitney U testControl: p < 0.0001
+D-APV 0.78 ± 1.2 SD+D-APV 5.4 ± 7.1 SDMann–Whitney U testPyr:Kcnq2: p = 0.0055
Posterior cortexAmplitude–D-APV 0.07 △F/F ± 0.049 SD–D-APV 0.26 △F/F ± 0.36 SDMann–Whitney U testControl: p < 0.0001Control: –D-APV n = 543; +D-APV n = 201 events
Pyr:Kcnq2: –D-APV n = 243; +D-APV n = 170 events
+D-APV 0.02 △F/F ± 0.01 SD+D-APV 0.13 △F/F ± 0.14 SDMann–Whitney U testPyr:Kcnq2: p < 0.0001
Duration–D-APV 1.99 s ± 2.1 SD–D-APV 5.1 s ± 4.2 SDMann–Whitney U testControl: p < 0.0001
+D-APV 2.5s ± 2.7 SD+D-APV 10.8 ± 6.6 SDMann–Whitney U testPyr:Kcnq2: p < 0.0001
Medial cortexAmplitude–D-APV 0.11 △F/F ± 0.16 SD–D-APV 0.18 △F/F ± 0.2 SDControl: N/AControl: N/AControl –D-APV n = 10; +D-APV n = 0 events
Pyr:Kcnq2 –D-APV n = 158; +D-APV, n = 50events;
+D-APV N/A+D-APV 0.14 △F/F ± 0.16 SDPyr:Kcnq2: Mann–Whitney U testPyr:Kcnq2: p = 0.22
Duration–D-APV 7.8s ± 8.4 SD–D-APV 6.3 ± 6.2 SDControl: N/AControl: N/A
+D-APV N/A+D-APV 12.9 ± 8.4 SDPyr:Kcnq2: Mann–Whitney U testPyr:Kcnq2: p < 0.0001
Anterior cortexAmplitude–D-APV 0.017 △F/F ± 0.006 SD–D-APV 0.31 △F/F ± 0.4 SDControl: N/AControl: N/AControl –D-APV n = 54; +D-APV n = 0 events
Pyr:Kcnq2: –D-APV n = 71; +D-APV n = 29 events
+D-APV N/A+D-APV 0.15 △F/F ± 0.19 SDPyr:Kcnq2: Mann–Whitney U testPyr:Kcnq2: p = 0.0055
Duration–D-APV 2.5 s ± 3.2 SD–D-APV 8.9 s ± 7.1 SDControl: N/AControl: N/A
+D-APV N/A+D-APV 13.3 ± 11 SDPyr:Kcnq2: Mann–Whitney U testPyr:Kcnq2: p = 0.04
Data were obtained from 3 control and 3 Pyr:Kcnq2 mice.
Figure 7
ControlPyr:Kcnq2Statistical tests and values
7CPower 0.02–0.2 Hz–D-APV 0.019 ± 0.0015 A.U.–D-APV 0.11 ± 0.0085 A.U.Control: Wilcoxon pairedControl: p < 0.0001Control: n = 20; Pyr:Kcnq2: n = 14 hemispheres
+D-APV 0.014 ± 0.0015 A.U.+D-APV 0.069 ± 0.0057 A.U.Pyr:Kcnq2: paired Student’s t testPyr:Kcnq2: p < 0.0001, t = 12.64, df = 13
Power 0.2–2 Hz–D-APV 0.24 ± 0.012 A.U.–D-APV 0.39 ± 0.022 A.U.Control: Wilcoxon pairedControl: p = 0.0007Control: n = 20; Pyr:Kcnq2: n = 14 hemispheres
+D-APV 0.18 ± 0.017 A.U.+D-APV 0.26 ± 0.0080 A.U.Pyr:Kcnq2: Wilcoxon pairedPyr:Kcnq2: p = 0.0001
7DROI 0.02–0.2 Hz–D-APV 8.9 ± 0.65 ROIs–D-APV 25.21 ± 1.3 ROIsControl: paired Student’s t testControl: p = 0.20 t = 1.32, df = 19Control: n = 20; Pyr:Kcnq2: n = 14 hemispheres
+D-APV 7.5 ± 0.92 ROIs+D-APV 20.71 ± 1.0 ROIsPyr:Kcnq2: paired Student’s t testPyr:Kcnq2: p = 0.0002 t = 5.22, df = 13
Power 0.2–2 Hz–D-APV 7.05 ± 0.54 ROIs–D-APV 0 ROIsControl: paired Student’s t testControl: p = 0.003 t = 3.472, df = 19Control: n = 20; Pyr:Kcnq2: n = 14 hemispheres
+D-APV 4.5 ± 0.54 ROIs+D-APV 0.43 ± 0.2 ROIsPyr:Kcnq2: N/AN/A
Data were obtained from 3 control and 3 Pyr:Kcnq2 mice.
Figure 8
P/N/A refers to Picrotoxin/APV/NBQXControlPyr:Kcnq2Statistical tests and values
8BCA3Amplitude–P/N/A: 0.046 Δ F/F ± 0.14 SD–P/N/A:0.105 ΔF/F ± 0.14 SDMann–Whitney U testControl: N/AControl –P/N/A: n = 444; +P/N/A: n = 0 events
Pyr:Kcnq2: –P/N/A: n = 246; +P/N/A: n = 38 events
N/A+P/N/A: ΔF/F 0.14 ± 0.13 SDPyr:Kcnq2
p = 0.0001
Duration–P/N/A: 0.59 s ± 1.3 SD–P/N/A: 4.5 s ± 6.7 SDMann–Whitney U testControl: N/A
N/A+P/N/A: 13.5 s ± 7.5 SDPyr:Kcnq2: p < 0.0001
Posterior cortexAmplitude0.059 Δ F/F ± 0.03 SD–P/N/A:0.48 Δ F/F ± 0.63 SDMann–Whitney U testControl: N/AControl –P/N/A: n = 228; +P/N/A: n = 0 events
Pyr:Kcnq2: –P/N/A: n = 194; +P/N/A: n = 36 events
N/A+P/N/A: Δ 0.71 F/F ± 0.47 SDPyr:Kcnq2: p = 0.009
Duration–P/N/A: 1.66 s ± 1.7 SD–P/N/A: 4.6 s ± 3.9 SDMann–Whitney U testControl: N/A
N/A+P/N/A: 10.2 s ± 3.6 SDPyr:Kcnq2: p < 0.0001
Medial cortexAmplitude0.028 Δ F/F ± 0.018 SD–P/N/A:0.38 Δ F/F ± 0.31 SDMann–Whitney U testControl: N/AControl –P/N/A: n = 22; +P/N/A: n = 0 events
Pyr:Kcnq2: –P/N/A: n = 64; +P/N/A: n = 56 events
N/A+P/N/A: Δ 0.19 F/F ± 0.17 SDPyr:Kcnq2: p = 0.005
Duration–P/N/A: 0.65 s ± 0.17 SD–P/N/A: 7.6 s ± 4.7 SDMann–Whitney U testControl: N/A
N/A+P/N/A: 8.9 s ± 7.5 SDPyr:Kcnq2: p = 0.087
Anterior cortexAmplitude0.029 Δ F/F ± 0.026 SD–P/N/A:0.47 Δ F/F ± 0.48 SDMann–Whitney U testControl: N/AControl –P/N/A: n = 22; +P/N/A: n = 0 events
Pyr:Kcnq2: –P/N/A: n = 82; +P/N/A: n = 43 events
N/A+P/N/A: Δ 0.35 F/F ± 0.38 SDPyr:Kcnq2: p = 0.087
Duration–P/N/A: 0.77 s ± 0.63 SD–P/N/A: 7.7 s ± 5.8 SDMann–Whitney U testControl: N/A
N/A+P/N/A: 14.1 s ± 8.7 SDPyr:Kcnq2: p = 0.016
Data were obtained from 3 control and 3 Pyr:Kcnq2 mice.
Figure 9
P/N/A refers to Picrotoxin/APV/NBQXControlPyr:Kcnq2Statistical tests and values
9C,DPower 0.02–0.2 Hz–P/A/N 0.018 ± 0.0007 A.U.–P/A/N 0.13 ± 0.0094 A.U.Control: Wilcoxon pairedControl: p < 0.0001Control: n = 18; Pyr:Kcnq2: n = 14 hemispheres
+P/A/N 0.01 ± 0.0006 A.U.+P/A/N 0.068 ± 0.0083 A.U.Pyr:Kcnq2: Wilcoxon pairedPyr:Kcnq2: p = 0.0001
Power 0.2–2 Hz–P/A/N 0.22 ± 0.007 A.U.–P/A/N 0.45 ± 0.03 A.U.Control: paired Student’s t testControl: p < 0.0001 t = 9.106, df = 17Control: n = 18; Pyr:Kcnq2: n = 14 hemispheres
+P/A/N 0.13 ± 0.002 A.U.+P/A/N 0.26 ± 0.01 A.U.Pyr:Kcnq2: paired Student’s t testPyr:Kcnq2: p < 0.0001 t = 9.055, df = 13
ROI 0.02–0.2 Hz–P/A/N 10.17 ± 0.93 ROIs–P/A/N 19.86 ± 1.2 ROIsControl: Wilcoxon pairedControl: p = 0.0001Control: n = 18; Pyr:Kcnq2: n = 14 hemispheres
+P/A/N 3.5 ± 0.85 ROIs+P/A/N 15.14 ± 1.3 ROIsPyr:Kcnq2: paired Student’s t testPyr:Kcnq2: p = 0.0092 t = 3.057, df = 13
ROI 0.2–2 Hz–P/A/N 8.7 ± 0.7 ROIs–P/A/N 0 ROIControl: Wilcoxon pairedControl: p < 0.0001Control: n = 18; Pyr:Kcnq2: n = 14 hemispheres
+P/A/N 0.72 ± 0.18 ROIs+P/A/N 0 ROIPyr:Kcnq2: N/A
Data were obtained from 3 control and 3 Pyr:Kcnq2 mice.
Figure 10
Kcnq3+/+Kcnq3−/−Statistical tests
10CCA3Amplitude0.08 ± 0.005△F/F0.08 ± 0.007△F/FWelch’s t testp = 0.95, t = 0.07052, df = 42Kcnq3+/+, n = 23; Kcnq3−/−: n = 21 hemispheres
Duration2.4 ± 0.8 s1.2 ± 0.2 sMann–Whitney U testp = 0.93
Events/s0.22 ± 0.03 Hz0.19 ± 0.3 HzMann–Whitney U testp = 0.05Kcnq3+/+, n = 24; Kcnq3−/−: n = 24 hemispheres
Posterior cortexAmplitude0.073 ± 0.006△F/F0.12 ± 0.01△F/FMann–Whitney U testp < 0.0001Kcnq3+/+, n = 23; Kcnq3−/−, n = 24 hemispheres
Duration1.4 ± 0.3 s4.5 ± 0.9 sMann–Whitney U testp < 0.0001
Events/s0.21 ± 0.025 Hz0.12 ± 0.023 HzMann–Whitney U testp = 0.013Kcnq3+/+, n = 24; Kcnq3−/−: n = 24 hemispheres
Medial cortexAmplitude0.028 ± 0.008△F/F0.09 ± 0.02△F/FMann–Whitney U testp = 0.08Kcnq3+/+, n = 13; Kcnq3−/−: n = 21 hemispheres
Duration3.2 ± 1.1 s4.3 ± 1.2 sMann–Whitney U testp = 0.004
Events/s0.02 ± 0.12 Hz0.017 ± 0.003 HzMann–Whitney U testp = 0.009Kcnq3+/+, n = 24; Kcnq3−/−: n = 24 hemispheres
Anterior cortexAmplitude0.03 ± 0.003△F/F0.10 ± 0.13△F/FMann–Whitney U testp < 0.0001Kcnq3+/+, n = 20; Kcnq3−/−: n = 22 hemispheres
Duration3.1 ± 1.0 s5.2 ± 1.3 sMann–Whitney U testp = 0.72
Events/s0.032 ± 0.007 Hz0.05 ± 0.007 HzMann–Whitney U testp = 0.06Kcnq3+/+, n = 24; Kcnq3−/−: n = 24 hemispheres
Data were obtained from 4 Kcnq3+/+ and 4 Kcnq3−/− mice.
Figure 11
Kcnq3+/+Kcnq3−/−Statistical tests
11DPower 0.02–0.2 Hz0.035 ± 0.005 A.U.0.06 ± 0.005 A.U.Mann–Whitney U testp < 0.0001Kcnq3+/+, n = 24; Kcnq3−/−: n = 24 hemispheres
Power 0.2–2 Hz0.57 ± 0.1 A.U.0.53 ± 0.08 A.U.Mann–Whitney U testp = 0.67
ROI 0.02–0.2 Hz12 ± 1 ROIs25 ± 1 ROIsMann–Whitney U testp < 0.0001Kcnq3+/+, n = 24; Kcnq3−/−: n = 24 hemispheres
ROI 0.2–2 Hz6.2 ± 0.8 ROIs0.6 ± 0.2 ROIsMann–Whitney U testp < 0.0001
Data were obtained from 4 Kcnq3+/+ and 4 Kcnq3−/− mice.
Figure 12
P/N/A refers to Picrotoxin/APV/NBQXKcnq3−/−
–blockers
Kcnq3−/−
+blockers
Statistical tests
12BCA3Amplitude0.09 ± 0.009 △F/F0.064 ± 0.008 △F/FStudent’s t testp = 0.054, t = 2.007, df = 29Kcnq3−/−: n = 16; +P/A/N: n = 15 hemispheres
Duration (not illustrated)1.1 ± 0.2 s7.7 ± 1.6 sWilcoxon pairedp = 0.0006Kcnq3-/: n = 16; P/A/N: n = 15 hemispheres
Events/s0.22 ± 0.03 Hz0.019 ± 0.3 HzWilcoxon paired testp = 0.0002Kcnq3−/− n = 18; P/A/N: n = 18 hemispheres
Posterior cortexAmplitude0.13 ± 0.01 △F/F0.17 ± 0.02 △F/FWilcoxon pairedp = 0.15Kcnq3−/− n = 18; P/A/N: n = 15 hemispheres
Duration (not illustrated)3.1 ± 0.8 s9.0 ± 0.9 sWilcoxon pairedp = 0.0006Kcnq3−/− n = 18; P/A/N: n = 15 hemispheres
Events/s0.16 ± 0.03 Hz0.01 ± 0.003 HzWilcoxon pairedp < 0.0001Kcnq3−/− n = 18; P/A/N: n = 18 hemispheres
Medial cortexAmplitude0.12 ± 0.02△F/FNDN/DN/DKcnq3−/− n = 18; +P/A/N: n = 0 hemispheres
Duration (not illustrated)5.2 ± 1.6 sNDN/DN/DKcnq3−/− n = 18; P/A/N: n = 0 hemispheres
Events/s0.02 ± 0.004 HzNDN/DN/DKcnq3−/− n = 18; P/A/N: n = 18 hemispheres
Anterior cortexAmplitude0.1 ± 0.1△F/F0.07 ± 0.02△F/FWilcoxon pairedp = 0.88Kcnq3−/− n = 18; P/A/N: n = 4 hemispheres
Duration (not illustrated)4.0 ± 0.7 s9.6 ± 3.4 sWilcoxon pairedp = 0.25Kcnq3−/− n = 18; P/A/N: n = 4 hemispheres
Events/s0.06 ± 0.007 Hz0.001 ± 0.0006 HzWilcoxon pairedp < 0.0001Kcnq3−/− n = 18; P/A/N: n = 18 hemispheres
Data were obtained from 3 Kcnq3+/+ and 3 Kcnq3−/− mice.
Figure 13
P/N/A refers to Picrotoxin/APV/NBQXKcnq3+/+Kcnq3−/−Statistical tests
13CPower 0.02–0.2 Hz–P/A/N 0.025 ± 0.0019–P/A/N 0.05 ± 0.003Kcnq3+/+ Wilcoxon pairedp < 0.0001Kcnq3+/+ n = 17; Kcnq3−/− n = 16 hemispheres
+P/A/N 0.01 ± 0.0009+P/A/N 0.02 ± 0.0018Kcnq3−/− paired Student’s t testp < 0.0001 t = 9.531, df = 15
Power 0.2–2 Hz–P/A/N 0.33 ± 0.012–P/A/N 0.33 ± 0.019Kcnq3+/+ paired Student’s t testp < 0.0001 t = 11.60, df = 16
+P/A/N 0.19 ± 0.006+P/A/N 0.19 ± 0.011Kcnq3−/− paired Student’s t testp < 0.0001 t = 8.787, df = 15
13DROI 0.02–0.2 Hz–P/A/N 12.5 ± 0.96–P/A/N 25 ± 1.3Kcnq3+/+ Wilcoxon pairedp = 0.0004 t = 4.477, df = 16Kcnq3+/+ n = 17; Kcnq3−/−
n = 16 hemispheres
+P/A/N 6.0 ± 1.1+P/A/N 17.7 ± 1.6Kcnq3−/− paired Student’s t testp = 0.0006 t = 4.321, df = 15
ROI 0.2–2 Hz–P/A/N 7.1 ± 0.92–P/A/N 0.75 ± 0.25Kcnq3+/+ Wilcoxon pairedp < 0.0001
+P/A/N 0.76 ± 0.22+P/A/N 0.81 ± 0.26Kcnq3−/−Wilcoxon pairedp = 0.83
Data were obtained from 3 Kcnq3+/+ and 3 Kcnq3−/− mice