Table 1

Summary of statistical tests

Data structureType of testResultEffect sizePower
aCategorical (binomial)Fisher’s exact testp = 2.8518e-06Odds ratio = 40.595% CI [6.57,249.65]
bLeech ID:
categorical (nominal)
Mean normalized firing rate during response period:
normally distributed;
W(21) = 0.9469; p = 0.2353
One-way ANOVAF(9,12) = 0.7406, p = 0.6686η2 = 0.35710.1091
cLeech ID:
categorical (nominal)
Normalized mean absolute difference from baseline firing rate:
normally distributed;
W(21) = 0.9279; p = 0.1109
One-way ANOVAF(9,12) = 2.2830, p = 0.0918η2 = 0.63130.2794
dMean baseline firing rate:
non-normal; W(21) = 0.8446; p = 0.0040
Mean normalized firing rate during response period:
normally distributed; W(21) = 0.9469; p = 0.2353
Pearson’s correlationp = 0.2067r = 0.280195% CI [−0.1604,0.6276]
eMean baseline firing rate:
non-normal; W(21) = 0.8446; p = 0.0040
Normalized mean absolute difference from baseline firing rate:
normally distributed;
W(21) = 0.9279; p = 0.1109
Pearson’s correlationp = 0.0408r = −0.426195% CI [−0.7186,−0.0055]
fMean baseline firing rate in normal saline:
normally distributed;
W(12) = 0.9104; p = 0.1856
Mean baseline firing rate in Ca2+-free saline:
non-normal; W(8) = 0.6781; p = 0.0024
Wilcoxon rank-sum testp = 0.2164r = 0.26350.2100
gCategorical (binomial)Fisher’s exact testp = 0.436Odds ratio = 2.250095% CI [0.3874,13.0665]
hCoefficient of variability of baseline firing rate in high-heat US trials:
normally distributed;
W(21) = 0.9315; p = 0.1317
Coefficient of variability of baseline firing rate in low-heat US trials:
normally distributed;
W(19) = 0.9456; p = 0.3046
Welch’s t testt(40) = 1.2403, p = 0.2221d = 0.134395% CI [−0.0530,0.2213]
  • Letters (leftmost column) correspond to statistical tests as reported in Results. The data structure, test type, result, effect size, and statistical power of these tests are described. Where applicable, results of Shapiro–Wilk tests for normality of data are reported under data structure. Effect sizes for Fisher tests are reported as odds ratios. One-way ANOVA effect sizes are reported as η2, calculated as the between-groups sum of squares divided by the total sum of squares. Effect sizes for Pearson’s correlation are the correlation coefficients. The effect size for the Wilcoxon rank-sum test is calculated as the z statistic divided by the square root of the population size, and the effect size of the Welch’s t test was calculated as Cohen’s d with a correction for small sample sizes as described (Durlak, 2009). When applicable, power was reported as the 95% confidence interval (CI) or statistical power calculated post hoc with G*Power.