Table 2

Experiments (until April 2019) from 15 different papers included in our pilot analyses investigating amnestic effects of postreactivation MDZ administration for contextual fear conditioning in adult rats under standard conditions (in chronological order based on publication date)

PublicationResearch groupExp.FigureReactivation session
duration
MDZ dose
(mg/kg)
NtotalEffect size
(Hedges’ g)
Bustos et al. (2006)I1B2B90 s1161.93*
Bustos et al. (2006)I2A3B90 s1172.40*
Bustos et al. (2006)I2A3B90 s1172.34*
Bustos et al. (2006)I3B7B90 s1164.60*
Zhang and Cranney (2008)II1190 s2180.96*
Zhang and Cranney (2008)II3390 s2161.76*
Bustos et al. (2009)INA1B1 min1.5140.74
Bustos et al. (2009)INA1C3 min1.5143.63*
Bustos et al. (2009)INA1D5 min1.5202.95*
Bustos et al. (2009)INA2C10 min1.515−2.06
Bustos et al. (2009)INA3B3 min1.5143.13*
Bustos et al. (2010)I11B3 min1.5 or 3172.52*
Bustos et al. (2010)I11C5 min1.5 or 3192.41*
Stern et al. (2012)III11A3 min1.5201.31*
Pineyro et al. (2013)IV11C1 min3120.04
Pineyro et al. (2013)IV11C4 min3123.53*
Pineyro et al. (2013)IV11C5 min3122.96*
Alfei et al. (2015)IV55A2 min3181.71*
Alfei et al. (2015)IV66B5 min3142.59*
Ortiz et al. (2015)I11C3 min3193.22*
Ortiz et al. (2015)I11E5 min3124.11*
Ortiz et al. (2015)I23C5 min3164.10*
Ferrer Monti et al. (2016)IV11C90 s315–0.05
Ferrer Monti et al. (2016)IV11C4 min3142.79*
Espejo et al. (2016)I115 min3153.92*
Espejo et al. (2016)I225 min3222.91*
Saitoh et al. (2017)VNA2B3 min1240.85*
Ferrer Monti et al. (2017)IV22B2 min3123.58*
Espejo et al. (2017)I115 min3163.30*
Espejo et al. (2017)I335 min3183.73*
Akagi et al. (2018)VNA2C3 min1300.83*
Franzen et al. (2019)IIINA1A1 min318–0.12
Franzen et al. (2019)IIINA1B2 min3171.39*
  • Adapted from Schroyens et al. (2019a). See Inclusion criteria for an overview of which conditions were included. Studies that used contextual fear conditioning and postreactivation systemic MDZ injection in rats were included after a thorough literature search. Note that two additional papers with MDZ studies were identified by our systematic PubMed search and included in the preregistered analyses (De Oliveira Alvares et al., 2013; Couto-Pereira et al., 2019). The effect size (Hedges’ g) for the influence of MDZ on % freezing during the test session was estimated based on means and SEs from reported graphs (MDZ vs vehicle) using the metafor package in R. Details of the intervention, such as duration of the training and reactivation session and drug dose, are indicated as well.

  • *Amnestic effects reported as significant (at an α level of 0.05). The numbers in the second column refer to the research group,

  • I, IFEC-CONICET, Departamento de Farmacología, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina.

  • II, School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

  • III, Department of Pharmacology, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil.

  • IV, Laboratorio de Psicología Experimental, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina.

  • V, Department of Neuropsychopharmacology, National Institute of Mental Health, National left of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan.