| Effect on AII eEPSC amplitude | | | | | |
| Control | Non-normal distribution | | | 1.00 ± 0.00 | |
| 50 μm W-7 | Normal distribution | | | 0.28 ± 0.05 | 9 |
| 100 μm ML-9 | Non-normal distribution | | | 0.12 ± 0.04 | 10 |
| 4 μm KN-62 | Normal distribution | | | 0.85 ± 0.07 | 10 |
| 40 μm MMPX | Non-normal distribution | | | 0.82 ± 0.16 | 8 |
| 1 μm ascomycin | Normal distribution | | | 0.73 ± 0.07 | 8 |
a | Control vs W-7 | | Wilcoxon signed-rank test | p = 0.0039 | | 9 |
b | Control vs ML-9 | | Wilcoxon signed-rank test | p = 0.0020 | | 10 |
c | Control vs KN-62 | | Wilcoxon signed-rank test | p = 0.0586 | | 10 |
d | Control vs MMPX | | Wilcoxon signed-rank test | p = 0.4609 | | 8 |
e | Control vs ascomycin | | Wilcoxon signed-rank test | p = 0.0078 | | 8 |
| Effect on AII mEPSC frequency | | | | | |
| Control | Non-normal distribution | | | 1.00 ± 0.00 | |
| 50 μm W-7 | Non-normal distribution | | | 5.95 ± 0.86 | 15 |
| 100 μm ML-9 | Normal distribution | | | 7.19 ± 1.32 | 10 |
| 4 μm KN-62 | Normal distribution | | | 0.88 ± 0.07 | 11 |
| 40 μm MMPX | Normal distribution | | | 1.35 ± 0.23 | 8 |
| 1 μm ascomycin | Normal distribution | | | 0.94 ± 0.10 | 15 |
f | Control vs W-7 | | Wilcoxon signed-rank test | p < 0.0001 | | 15 |
g | Control vs ML-9 | | Wilcoxon signed-rank test | p = 0.0020 | | 10 |
h | Control vs KN-62 | | Wilcoxon signed-rank test | p = 0.2139 | | 11 |
i | Control vs MMPX | | Wilcoxon signed-rank test | p = 0.3828 | | 8 |
j | Control vs ascomycin | | Wilcoxon signed-rank test | p = 0.3591 | | 15 |