Table 2

Statistical table

DataMethodFactornT, U, or F statp valuePost hoc correction
Fig. 1C Mann–WhitneyResident vs control6, 7U = 20.008
Fig. 1D Mann–WhitneyResident vs control6, 7U = 50.027
Fig. 1E Student’s t testResident vs control6, 7T(11) = 0.1640.872
Fig. 1F Student’s t testResident vs control6, 7T(11) = 0.0620.952
Fig. 1H One-way ANOVA# of cells at bregma −4.845, 5F(2,14) = 13.339<0.001Tukey’s
One-way ANOVA# of cells at bregma −4.605, 5F(2,14) = 6.3570.013Tukey’s
One-way ANOVA# of cells at bregma −4.345, 5F(2,14) = 168.490<0.001Tukey’s
Fig. 1I One-way ANOVA% of DAPI at bregma −4.845, 5F(2,14) = 13.859<0.001Tukey’s
One-way ANOVA% of cells at bregma −4.605, 5F(2,14) = 4.4930.035Tukey’s
One-way ANOVA% of cells at bregma −4.345, 5F(2,14) = 20.455<0.001Tukey’s
Fig. 2C Mann–WhitneyChR2 vs GFP6, 6U = 00.005
Fig. 2D Student’s t testChR2 vs GFP6, 6T(10) = 0.2030.843
Fig. 2G One-way ANOVATpH2 vs ChR25, 5F(2,17) = 13.714<0.001Tukey’s
One-way ANOVATpH2 vs ArchT5, 5F(2,17) = 20.868<0.001Tukey’s
Fig. 2K Student’s t testOpsin vs GFP5, 4T(7) = 0.7930.454
Fig. 2O Student’s t testBefore light onset (10 s)5, 4T(7) = −0.6070.563
Student’s t testDuring light (10 s)5, 4T(7) = 0.8820.407
Fig. 2S Student’s t testBefore light onset (10 s)5, 3T(6) = 0.1360.896
Student’s t testDuring light (10 s)5, 3T(6) = −10.784<0.001
Fig. 3L Student’s t testChR2 vs GFP at bregma 2.686, 6T(10) = 0.3250.752
Student’s t testChR2 vs GFP at bregma 2.686, 6T(10) = 0.8900.346
Student’s t testChR2 vs GFP at bregma 2.346, 6T(10) = 0.3960.701
Fig. 3M Student’s t testChR2 vs GFP at bregma 2.346, 6T(10) = 8.033<0.001
Student’s t testChR2 vs GFP at bregma 2.106, 6T(10) = 3.8500.003
Student’s t testChR2 vs GFP at bregma 2.106, 6T(10) = 7.965<0.001
Fig. 4L Student’s t testChR2 vs GFP6, 6T(10) = 0.4740.646
Fig. 4M Student’s t testChR2 vs GFP6, 6T(10) = 0.5580.589
Fig. 4N Student’s t testChR2 vs GFP6, 6T(10) = 0.2580.801
Fig. 4O Student’s t testChR2 vs GFP6, 6T(10) = 1.1000.297
Fig. 4P Student’s t testChR2 vs GFP6, 6T(10) = 1.2030.257
Fig. 4Q Student’s t testChR2 vs GFP6, 6T(10) = 4.693<0.001
Fig. 4R Student’s t testChR2 vs GFP6, 6T(10) = 2.7450.021
Fig. 4S Student’s t testChR2 vs GFP6, 6T(10) = 3.1040.011
Fig. 4T Student’s t testChR2 vs GFP6, 6T(10) = 1.5970.141
Fig. 4U Student’s t testChR2 vs GFP6, 6T(10) = 2.5250.030
Fig. 5D Student’s t testOpsin vs GFP4, 3T(5) = 1.1010.321
Fig. 5H Student’s t testBefore light onset (10 s)4, 3T(5) = 0.8450.437
Mann–WhitneyDuring light (10 s)4, 3U = 280.952
Fig. 5L Student’s t testBefore light onset (10 s)4, 3T(5) = 0.6320.555
Student’s t testDuring light (10 s)4, 3T(5) = −6.606<0.001
Fig. 6D Student’s t testOpsin vs GFP5, 4T(7) = 0.1370.895
Fig. 6H Student’s t testBefore light onset (10 s)4, 3T(5) = 0.8450.437
Mann–WhitneyDuring light (10 s)4, 3T(5) = 01.000
Fig. 6L Student’s t testBefore light onset (10 s)6, 4T(8) = −1.2170.278
Student’s t testDuring light (10 s)6, 4T(8) = 0.7430.491
Fig. 7D Student’s t testOpsin vs GFP4, 3T(5) = 1.1300.310
Fig. 7H Student’s t testBefore light onset (10 s)4, 3T(5) = 1.4250.214
Student’s t testDuring light (10 s)4, 3T(5) = 8.871<0.001
Fig. 7L Student’s t testOpsin vs GFP6, 4T(8) = 1.0100.342
Fig. 7P Student’s t testBefore light onset (10 s)6, 4T(8) = 0.2290.826
Student’s t testDuring light (10 s)6, 4T(8) = −12.538<0.001