Data | Method | Factor | n | F, t, orU DF | F, t, orU stat | p value | Post hoctest |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

Figure 1B
| Mann–Whitney | Shocks | 8, 8 | U = | 7.000 | 0.007 | |

Figure 1C
| Mann–Whitney | Shocks | 6, 8 | U = | 2.000 | 0.003 | |

Figure 1D
| Mann–Whitney | Shocks | 6, 8 | U = | 7.000 | 0.029 | |

Figure 1E
| Mann–Whitney | Shocks | 6, 8 | U = | 0.000 | <0.001 | |

Figure 1F
| Mann–Whitney | Shocks | 6, 8 | U = | 4.000 | 0.008 | |

Figure 1H
| Mann–Whitney | Shocks | 7, 7 | U = | 8.000 | 0.038 | |

Figure 1I
| Mann–Whitney | Shocks | 7, 7 | U = | 18.000 | 0.456 | |

Figure 1J
| Mann–Whitney | Shocks | 7, 7 | U = | 16.000 | 0.534 | |

Figure 1K
| Mann–Whitney | Shocks | 7, 7 | U = | 5.000 | 0.011 | |

Figure 1L
| Mann–Whitney | Shocks | 7, 7 | U = | 7.000 | 0.026 | |

Figure 2F
| Kruskal–Wallis one-way ANOVAon ranks with Dunn's methods | fEPSPs from shocks | 6 | H_{(2)} = | 11.474 | 0.003 | Tukey's |

One-way ANOVA | fEPSPs without foot shocks | 3 | F_{(2,6)} = | 2.439 | 0.168 | Tukey's | |

Figure 2J
| One-way ANOVA | fEPSPs from shocks | 5 | F_{(2,12)} = | 8.362 | 0.005 | Tukey's |

One-way ANOVA | fEPSPs without foot shocks | 4 | F_{(2,9)} = | 0.196 | 0.826 | Tukey's | |

Figure 2N
| One-way ANOVA | fEPSPs from shocks | 4 | F_{(2,9)} = | 0.612 | 0.563 | Tukey's |

One-way ANOVA | fEPSPs without foot shocks | 3 | F_{(2,6)} = | 0.325 | 0.734 | Tukey's | |

Figure 3B
| Two-way ANOVA | LFPS from shocks | 8, 8, 6 | F_{(1,19)} = | 2.548 | 0.127 | Tukey's |

Two-way ANOVA | Virus | 8, 8, 6 | F_{(1,19)} = | 0.383 | 0.543 | Tukey's | |

Figure 3C
| Two-way ANOVA | LFPS from shocks | 7, 7, 5 | F_{(1,16)} = | 6.024 | 0.026 | Tukey's |

Virus | 7, 7, 5 | F_{(1,16)} = | 7.437 | 0.015 | Tukey's | ||

Figure 3D
| Two-way ANOVA | LFPS from shocks | 7, 7, 5 | F_{(1,16)} = | 4.595 | 0.048 | Tukey's |

Virus | 7, 7, 5 | F_{(1,16)} = | 10.286 | 0.005 | Tukey's | ||

Figure 3E
| Two-way ANOVA | LFPS from shocks | 7, 7, 5 | F_{(1,16)} = | 8.776 | 0.009 | Tukey's |

Virus | 7, 7, 5 | F_{(1,16)} = | 6.137 | 0.025 | Tukey's | ||

Figure 3F
| Two-way ANOVA | LFPS from shocks | 7, 7, 5 | F_{(1,16)} = | 5.844 | 0.028 | Tukey's |

Virus | 7, 7, 5 | F_{(1,16)} = | 4.969 | 0.04 | Tukey's | ||

Figure 3H
| Two-way ANOVA | LFPS from shocks | 7, 7, 5 | F_{(1,21)} = | 2.704 | 0.115 | Tukey's |

Virus | 7, 7, 5 | F_{(1,21)} = | 2.085 | 0.163 | Tukey's | ||

Figure 3I
| Two-way ANOVA | LFPS from shocks | 7, 7, 5 | F_{(1,21)} = | 0.223 | 0.641 | Tukey's |

Virus | 7, 7, 5 | F_{(1,21)} = | 1.603 | 0.219 | Tukey's | ||

Figure 3J
| Two-way ANOVA | LFPS from shocks | 8, 8, 8 | F_{(1,21)} = | 0.516 | 0.480 | Tukey's |

Virus | 8, 8, 8 | F_{(1,21)} = | 0.626 | 0.438 | Tukey's | ||

Figure 3K
| Two-way ANOVA | LFPS from shocks | 7, 7, 7 | F_{(1,21)} = | 0.000 | 0.984 | Tukey's |

Virus | 7, 7, 7 | F_{(1,21)} = | 0.364 | 0.553 | Tukey's | ||

Figure 3L
| Two-way ANOVA | LFPS from shocks | 8, 8, 8 | F_{(1,21)} = | 0.205 | 0.656 | Tukey's |

Virus | 8, 8, 8 | F_{(1,21)} = | 1.076 | 0.311 | Tukey's | ||

Figure 4D
| One-way ANOVA | Time from shocks | 6 | F_{(2,15)} = | 0.135 | 0.875 | Tukey's |

Figure 4F
| One-way ANOVA | Time from shocks | 5 | F_{(2,12)} = | 0.473 | 0.634 | Tukey's |

Figure 5B
| Two-way ANOVA | Shocks | 6, 10, 7 | F_{(1,20)} = | 0.018 | 0.895 | Tukey's |

LFPS vs no stim | 6, 10, 7 | F_{(1,20)} = | 5.588 | 0.028 | Tukey's | ||

Figure 5C
| Two-way ANOVA | Shocks | 6, 10, 7 | F_{(1,20)} = | 1.167 | 0.293 | Tukey's |

LFPS vs no stim | 6, 10, 7 | F_{(1,20)} = | 0.600 | 0.448 | Tukey's | ||

Figure 5D
| Two-way ANOVA | Shocks | 6, 10, 7 | F_{(1,20)} = | 0.292 | 0.595 | Tukey's |

LFPS vs no stim | 6, 10, 7 | F_{(1,20)} = | 12.715 | 0.002 | Tukey's | ||

Figure 5E
| Two-way ANOVA | Shocks | 6, 10, 7 | F_{(1,20)} = | 1.944 | 0.179 | Tukey's |

LFPS vs no stim | 6, 10, 7 | F_{(1,20)} = | 5.262 | 0.033 | Tukey's | ||

Figure 5F
| Two-way ANOVA | Shocks | 6, 8, 6 | F_{(1,17)} = | 0.155 | 0.698 | Tukey's |

LFPS vs no stim | 6, 8, 6 | F_{(1,17)} = | 7.25 | 0.015 | Tukey's | ||

Figure 5G
| Two-way ANOVA | Shocks | 6, 8, 6 | F_{(1,17)} = | 0.281 | 0.603 | Tukey's |

LFPS vs no stim | 6, 8, 6 | F_{(1,17)} = | 5.694 | 0.029 | Tukey's | ||

Figure 5H
| Two-way ANOVA | Shocks | 6, 8, 6 | F_{(1,17)} = | 0.007 | 0.937 | Tukey's |

LFPS vs no stim | 6, 8, 6 | F_{(1,17)} = | 6.973 | 0.017 | Tukey's | ||

Figure 5I
| Two-way ANOVA | Shocks | 6, 8, 6 | F_{(1,17)} = | 0.589 | 0.453 | Tukey's |

LFPS vs no stim | 6, 8, 6 | F_{(1,17)} = | 8.380 | 0.010 | Tukey's | ||

Extended DataFigure 4-1B
| One-way ANOVA | fEPSPs from shocks | 6 | F_{(2,15)} = | 6.752 | 0.008 | Tukey's |

Extended DataFigure 4-1D
| One-way ANOVA | fEPSPs from shocks | 5 | F_{(2,12)} = | 7.690 | 0.007 | Tukey's |