Start | End | Hyp-E | Hyp-I | Alt Hyp | # Tests | Support | Reject | Disc | Ques | Comp |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

32 | 50 | X | 6 | X | ||||||

51 | 59 | X | 2 | 5 | X | X | ||||

60 | 72 | X | 7 | X | X | |||||

74 | 92 | X | 7 | X | ||||||

93 | 107 | X | 6 | X | ||||||

108 | 119 | X | ||||||||

120 | 136 | X | 7 | X | ||||||

137 | 148 | X | 3 | 8 | X | X | ||||

149 | 157 | X | 2 | 5 | X | X | ||||

158 | 172 | X | 2 | 8 | X | X | ||||

173 | 182 | X | 2 | 5 | X | |||||

183 | 199 | X | 9 | X | ||||||

200 | 219 | X | ||||||||

220 | 231 | X | ||||||||

232 | 244 | X | 7 | X | ||||||

245 | 256 | X | 1 | 7 | X | X | ||||

263 | 277 | X | 1 | 7 | X | X | ||||

278 | 290 | X | ||||||||

291 | 307 | X | 7 | X | ||||||

308 | 322 | X | 1 | 7 | X | X | ||||

322 | 334 | X | 7 | X | ||||||

335 | 346 | X | ||||||||

347 | 362 | X | ||||||||

363 | 378 | X | 6 | X | ||||||

379 | 397 | X | 1 | 8 | X | X | ||||

398 | 408 | X | ||||||||

409 | 422 | X | 1 | 4 | X | |||||

423 | 440 | X | 3 | 8 | X | X | ||||

441 | 451 | X | 2 | 9 | X | X | ||||

452 | 464 | X | 6 | X | ||||||

465 | 473 | X | 8 | X | ||||||

474 | 483 | X | 9 | X | ||||||

484 | 497 | X | 1 | 9 | X | X | ||||

498 | 502 | X | ||||||||

518 | 529 | X | 8 | X | ||||||

530 | 543 | X | ||||||||

548 | 554 | X | 1 | 8 | X | |||||

555 | 574 | X | 9 | X | ||||||

575 | 585 | X | 8 | X | ||||||

586 | 594 | X | ||||||||

595 | 612 | X | 1 | 3 | X | X | ||||

613 | 630 | X | 1 | 7 | X | X | ||||

631 | 647 | X | 8 | X | ||||||

648 | 658 | X | 6 | X | ||||||

659 | 678 | X | 3 | 5 | X | |||||

679 | 690 | X. | 5 | X | ||||||

691 | 709 | X | ||||||||

710 | 722 | X | ||||||||

723 | 732 | X | 1 | 5 | X | X | ||||

733 | 744 | X | ||||||||

745 | 754 | X | 1 | 4 | X | |||||

755 | 768 | X | 5 | X |

Classification of research reports published in

*The Journal of Neuroscience*, vol. 38, issues 1–3, 2018, identified by page range (*n*= 52). An x denotes that the paper was classified in this category. Categories were: Hyp-E: at least one hypothesis was fairly explicitly stated; Hyp-I: at least one hypothesis could be inferred from the logical organization of the paper and its conclusions, but was not explicitly stated; Alt-Hyp: at least one alternative hypothesis in addition to the main one was tested; # Tests: is an estimate of the number of experiments that critically tested the major (not subsidiary or other) hypothesis; Support: the tests were consistent with the main hypothesis; Reject: at least some tests explicitly falsified at least one hypothesis; Disc: a largely “discovery science” report, not obviously hypothesis-based; Ques: experiments attempted to answer a series of questions, not unambiguously hypothesis-based; Comp: mainly a computational modeling study, experimental data were largely material for model.