Two-way ANOVA and Kruskal–Wallis parameters for extracellular recordings in GnRH-GFP-3Dq and GnRH-GFP mice
| Comparison (figure) | Control vs PNA | Saline vs CNO | Interaction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Two-way ANOVA for firing rate (Hz) inGnRH-GFP-3Dq mice (6A) | F(1,35) = 0.021, p = 0.885 | F(1,35) = 1.865, p = 0.181 | F(1,35) = 0.104, p = 0.749 |
| Naive vs sham | Naive vs 4Di | Naive vs 3Dq | |
| Kruskal–Wallis (KW = 8.361)/Dunn (6B) | p > 0.99 | p > 0.99 | p = 0.0169 |