Table 2

Statistical table

FigureType of testStatistical data
Fig. 3A, average trialsRM one-way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons post hocp = 0.0006, post hoc day 1 vs day 3, p < 0.001
Fig. 3A, RTAs abovep = 0.0002, day 1 vs day 2, p = 0.001 and day 1 vs day 3, p = 0.0002
Fig. 3A, ITIAs abovep = 0.0002, day 1 vs day 2, p = 0.0148 and day 1 vs day 3, p = 0.0001
Fig. 3C, average trialsAs abovep = 0.0046, day 1 vs day 3, p = 0.0057; day 1 vs day 4, p = 0.0057 and day 1 vs day 5, p = 0.0036
Fig. 3C, RTAs abovep = 0.0022, day 1 vs day 3, p = 0.0027; day 1 vs day 4, p = 0.0011 and day 1 vs day 5, p = 0.0275
Fig. 3C, ITIAs abovep < 0.0001, day 1 vs day 3, p = 0.0004; day 1 vs day 4, p < 0.0001 and day 1 vs day 5, p = 0.0002
Fig. 3C, correctAs abovep = 0.0025, day 1 vs day 2, p = 0.0464; day 1 vs day 3, p = 0.0043; day 1 vs day 4, p = 0.0042 and day 1 vs day 5, p = 0.0013
Fig. 3D, average trialsAs abovep = 0.0058; baseline vs 4 months, p = 0.0042
Fig. 3D, RTAs abovep < 0.0001, baseline vs 6 d, p = 0.0063; baseline vs 4 months, p < 0.0001
Fig. 3D, ITIAs abovep < 0.0001, baseline vs 27 d, p = 0.0093, baseline vs 3 months, p = 0.0009, baseline vs 4 months, p = 0.0252
Fig. 3D, correctAs abovep = 0.2290
Fig. 4B, relative explorationAs abovep < 0.0001, corner vs center, p < 0.0001; corner vs reward, p < 0.0001, center vs reward, p < 0.0001
Fig. 4C, correlation matrix TR vs RTSpearman’s correlationr = –0.8223 (95% CI, –0.9335 to –0.5669); R2 = 0.6761
Fig. 4C, correlation matrix TR vs ITISpearman’s correlationr = –0.9472 (95% CI, –0.9811 to –0.8573); R2 = 0.8971
Fig. 4C, correlation matrix ITI vs RTSpearman’s correlationr = 0.9209 (95% CI, 0.7910 to 0.9714); R2 = 0.8480
Fig. 4C, correlation matrix DIST vs RTSpearman’s correlationr = 0.5666 (95% CI, 0.1208 to 0.8222); R2 = 0.3210
Fig. 4C, correlation matrix DIST vs ITISpearman’s correlationr = 0.4972 (95% CI, 0.02450 to 0.7882); R2 = 0.2472
Fig. 4D, tracking distanceOne-way ANOVA, Holm–Sidak’s post hocp = 0.03; day 1 vs day 3, p = 0.02