Table 1

Statistical table

LocationData structureType of testPower/confidence intervals
a Normal distributionDifferential gene expression analysisMultiple comparison adjusted FDR p values are reported
b Non-normal distributionMann–Whitney testp < 0.0001
c CategoricalFisher’s exact test0.1% odorant p = 0.0147; 1% odorant p = 0.0021; 100% odorant p = 0.0057
d Non-normal distributionMann–Whitney test0.1% odorant p < 0.0001; 1% odorant p = 0.0855; 100% odorant p = 0.0029
e Normal distributionOne-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s post hoc testOlfr923Olfr983Olfr376
No odor vs 0.001%0.8840.11060.5127
No odor vs 0.01%0.0187<0.00010.646
No odor vs 1%<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001
No odor vs 100%<0.0001<0.00010.0004
f Normal distributionOne-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s post hoc testOlfr1427: no odor vs 0.001% = 0.9982, no odor vs 0.01% = 0.9106,
no odor vs 1% < 0.0001
Olfr901: no odor vs 0.001% = 0.7569, no odor vs 0.01% = 0.0930,
no odor vs 1% = 0.0030, no odor vs 100% < 0.0001
Olfr1395: no odor vs 0.001% = 0.9889, no odor vs 0.01% = 0.8116,
no odor vs 1% = 0.6882, no odor vs 100% = 0.3402
g Normal distributionOne-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s post hoc testOlfr1395Olfr1297Olfr165Olfr376
No odor vs 0.001%0.8110.44290.00140.9326
No odor vs 0.01%<0.0001<0.00010.00090.7041
No odor vs 1%<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001
h Non-normal distributionMann-Whitney testNormalized in vitro activation data:
0.1% ACT p(3μM) = 0.0795, p(30μM) = 0.0289, p(300μM) = 0.0458;
1% ACT p(3μM) = 0.0120, p(30μM) = 0.0029, p(300μM) = 0.0011;
100% ACT p(3μM) = 0.7345, p(30μM) = 0.0011, p(300μM) < 0.0001;
Fold enrichment in vivo data: 0.01% ACT p < 0.0001; 0.1% ACT p = 0.0642; 1% ACT p = 0.0023; 100% ACT p < 0.0001
i Normal distributionLinear regressionSlope deviation from zero p values are reported
j Normal distributionPaired t testCell count p = 0.019, percentage cFos p = 0.032
k Normal distributionPaired t testp = 0.0371