Table 1.

Statistical analyses used within the manuscript

Data structureType of testComparison95% confidence interval
Figure 2A Non-normally distributedTwo-way ANOVA
Dunett's multiple comparison testMorphine vs vehicle0.864 to 1.719
Morphine vs gefitinib0.7783 to 2.011
Morphine vs morphine + gefitinib–2.349 to –1.117
Figure 2B Non-normally distributedTwo-way ANOVA
Dunett's multiple comparison testMorphine vs vehicle0.8614 to 1.635
Morphine vs gefitinib0.7111 to 1.484
Morphine vs morphine + gefitinib–2.034 to –1.223
Figure 2C Non-normally distributedTwo-way ANOVA
Dunett's multiple comparison testMorphine vs vehicle0.1181 to 1.828
Morphine vs EGF0.8573 to 2.567
Figure 3A Non-normally distributedTwo-way ANOVA
Dunett's multiple comparison testMorphine vs sham–11.35 to –9.522
Morphine vs gefitinib–0.9836 to 0.9314
Morphine vs morphine + gefitinib–8.873 to –6.958
Figure 3B Normally distributedTwo-way ANOVA
Dunett's multiple comparison testMorphine vs vehicle–1.497 to 1.603
Morphine vs EGF-FC–1.904 to 1.196
Morphine vs morphine + EGF-FC–10.45 to –7.348
Figure 4A Normally distributedTwo-way ANOVA
Dunett's multiple comparison testVehicle vs imatinib–1.891 to 2.498
Vehicle vs EGF6.313 to 10.07
Vehicle vs EGF+ imatinib–6913 to 3.697
Figure 4B Normally distributedTwo-way ANOVA
Dunett's multiple comparison testVehicle vs imatinib–1.515 to 1.977
Vehicle vs EGF–1.367 to 2.126
Vehicle vs EGF+ imatinib–1.732 to 1.761
Figure 4C Normally distributedTwo-way ANOVA
Dunett's multiple comparison testVehicle vs gefitinib–1.408 to 2.104
Vehicle vs PDGF4.401 to 7.913
Vehicle vs PDGF+ gefitinib–0.1661 to 3.346
Figure 4D Normally distributedTwo-way ANOVA
Dunett's multiple comparison testVehicle vs gefitinib–0.921 to 1.743
Vehicle vs PDGF–0.9921 to 1.536
Vehicle vs PDGF+ gefitinib–0.606 to 2.058