Table 4.

Statistics for the data shown in Figure 4

FigureStatistical testStatistics outputN
Fig. 3D,H Thapsigargin + WIN: 3 mice, 4 slices, 11 soma (s), 97 non-soma (ns)
Increase magnitude: treatment (WIN/ Thap + WIN) × ROI (s/ns)Kruskal–WallisH(3) = 14.685, p = 0.002 
Fig. 4AM251: 4 mice, 8 slices, 175 s, 818 ns
Decreased events in s: event number × time (base, AM251, wash)Friedmanχ2(2) = 83.089, p < 0.0001 
Base to AM251Wilcoxon signed-rankZ = –7.621, p < 0.0001 
Base to washWilcoxon signed-rankZ = –3.732, p < 0.0001 
AM251 to washWilcoxon signed-rankZ = –2.275, p = 0.001 
Decreased events in ns: event number × time (base, AM251, wash)FriedmanX2(2) = 394.339, p < 0.0001 
Base to AM251Wilcoxon signed-rankZ = –16.763, p < 0.0001 
Base to washWilcoxon signed-rankZ = –8.882, p < 0.0001 
AM251 to washWilcoxon signed-rankZ = –7.578, p < 0.0001 
Increased events in s: event number × time (base, AM251, wash)Friedmanχ2(2) = 54.926, p = 0.000 
Base to AM251Wilcoxon signed-rankZ = –6.740, p < 0.0001 
Base to washWilcoxon signed-rankZ = –3.090, p = 0.002 
AM251 to washWilcoxon signed-rankZ = –2.953, p = 0.003 
Increased events in ns: event number × time (base, AM251, wash)FriedmanX2(2) = 302.035, p = 0.000 
Base to AM251Wilcoxon signed-rankZ = –14.338, p < 0.0005 
Base to washWilcoxon signed-rankZ = –5.648, p < 0.0005 
AM251 to washWilcoxon signed-rankZ = –9.564, p < 0.0005