Table 5.

Statistics for the data shown in Figures 5-Figures 8

FigureStatistical testStatistics outputN
Fig. 5Depol + AM251: 9 neurons, 4 mice, 225 ROIs [soma (s) and non-soma (ns)]
Change in events: events (pre/post depol) × time (base, AM251, wash)Friedmanχ2(5) = 155.838, p < 0.0005 
Pre to post baseWilcoxon signed-rankZ = –5.418, p < 0.0005 
Pre to post AM251Wilcoxon signed-rankZ = –7.401, p < 0.0005 
Pre to post WashWilcoxon signed-rankZ = –1.755, p = 0.079 
Fig. 6A  ACPTII: 9 neurons, 3 mice
mGPSC frequency: DMSO × ACPTIIANOVAF(1,28) = 0.746, p = 0.395 
mGPSC amplitude: DMSO × ACPTIIANOVAF(1,28) = 2.135, p = 0.155 
mGPSC frequency: ACPTII × ACPTII + WINANOVAF(1,8) = 19.527, p = 0.002 
mGPSC amplitude: ACPTII × ACPTII + WINANOVAF(1,8) = 3.206, p = 0.067 
Fig. 6BCGS: 8 neurons, 3 mice
mGPSC frequency: DMSO × CGS15943 (CGS)ANOVAF(1,28) = 1.539, p = 0.225 
mGPSC frequency: CGS × CGS + WINANOVAF(1,7) = 1.754, p = 0.227 
Fig. 6CDPCPX: 12 neurons, 4 mice
mGPSC frequency: DMSO × DPCPXANOVAF(1,31) = 0.03, p = 0.863 
mGPSC amplitude: DMSO × DPCPXANOVAF(1,31) = 0.032, p = 0.858 
mGPSC frequency: DPCPX × DPCPX + WINANOVAF(1,11) = 0.007, p = 0.935 
mGPSC amplitude: DPCPX × DPCPX + WINANOVAF(1,11) = 2.353, p = 0.153 
Fig. 7Adenosine: 15 neurons, 4 mice
mGPSC frequency: DMSO × adenosineANOVAF(1,32) = 4.144, p = 0.05 
mGPSC amplitude: DMSO × adenosineANOVAF(1,32) = 4.041, p = 0.053 
Fig. 8CNO: 7 slices, 54 s, 265 ns
Increase magnitude CNO:
s × ns
Mann–Whitney UU = 2667, p = 0.95 
Increase magnitude: treatment (CNO/ Thap + CNO) × ROI (s/ns)Kruskal–WallisH(3) = 15.400, p = 0.001Thap + CNO: 3 mice, 7 s, 64 ns
Increase magnitude ns: CNO × Thap + CNOMedian post hocp = 0.022