Table 1.

Statistical table

Line	Figure	Comparison	Type of test	p value
a	Fig. 2A	GFP level in Gγ₁ ^-/- vs WT	Mann–Whitney	0.0007
b	Fig. 2A	GFP level in P23H vs WT	Mann–Whitney	0.0007
c	Fig. 2A	GFP level in Gγ₁ ^-/- vs P23H	Mann–Whitney	0.0022
d	Fig. 2B	Luc activity in Rox WT vs untreated	Mann–Whitney	0.0001
e	Fig. 2B	Luc activity in P23H vs WT	Mann–Whitney	0.0002
f	Fig. 2B	Luc activity in Gγ₁ ^-/- vs WT	Mann–Whitney	<0.0001
g	Fig. 2B	Luc activity in Gγ₁ ^-/- vs P23H	Mann–Whitney	0.0016
h	Fig. 3A	P97 level in Gγ₁ ^-/- vs WT	Mann–Whitney	0.8182
i	Fig. 3A	P97 level in P23H vs WT	Mann–Whitney	0.7056
j	Fig. 3B	P97 level in P97oe vs WT	Mann–Whitney	0.0079
k	Fig. 3D	Nuclei in P97oe vs WT at three months	Mann–Whitney	0.0357
l	Fig. 4B	Nuclei in Gγ₁ ^-/-/P97oe vs Gγ₁ ^-/- at three months	Mann–Whitney	0.2
m	Fig. 4E	Nuclei in Gγ₁ ^-/-/P97oe vs Gγ₁ ^-/- at six months	Mann–Whitney	0.0095
n	Fig. 5	GFP level in Gγ₁ ^-/-/P97oe vs Gγ₁ ^-/-	Mann–Whitney	0.0079