Table 1:

Basic membrane properties from the NAc shell in Non-devalued and Devalued mice

Non-devaluedDevaluedInteractionMain effect
GFPGFP+GFPGFP+GFP × devaluationGFPDevaluation
RMP (mV)−70.8 ± 0.7−69.4 ± 1.1−69.1 ± 0.8−70.3 ± 0.8F(1,38) = 2.28, p = 0.14F(1,38) = 0.19, p = 0.66F(1,38) = 0.02, p = 0.9
Rheobase (pA)115.0 ± 10.5**63.2 ± 4.0**96.7 ± 13.591.2 ± 11.9F(1,37) = 4.57, p = 0.04F(1,37) = 0.20, p = 0.66F(1,37) = 7.02, p = 0.01
Input resistance (MΩ)151.2 ± 10.7***246.5 ± 27.6***160.2 ± 12.0200.6 ± 17.2F(1,37) = 1.28, p = 0.26F(1,37) = 13.04, p < 0.01F(1,37) = 0.34, p = 0.57
AHP (mV)−8.9 ± 0.5−9.8 ± 0.8***−7.7 ± 0.8−7.3 ± 0.8***F(1,38) = 0.78, p = 0.38F(1,38) = 0.07, p = 0.79F(1,38) = 6.07, p = 0.02
AP half- width (ms)1.4 ± 0.1**1.8 ± 0.15**,***1.4 ± 0.031.4 ± 0.04***F(1,37) = 2.9, p = 0.1F(1,37) = 6.0, p = 0.02F(1,37) = 4.31, p = 0.04
AP amplitude (mV)67.4 ± 1.958.7 ± 4.265.9 ± 3.363.5 ± 3.8F(1,37) = 0.82, p = 0.37F(1,37) = 2.53, p = 0.12F(1,37) = 0.22, p = 0.64
  • Data in first four columns are expressed as the mean ± SEM.

  • *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, post hoc comparison GFP+ vs GFP; ***p < 0.05, post hoc comparison Non-devalued vs Devalued.