Table 1.

Statistical table

ComparisonData structureType of testMean diff. (95% CI)
aPSD95, EAE-V versus Sham-VNormalOne-way ANOVA, Sidak post hoc–0.24 (–0.45 to –0.02)
bPSD95, EAE-099 versus EAE-VNormalOne-way ANOVA, Sidak post hoc0.25 (0.01 to 0.48)
cEAE score (IHC cohort), EAE-099 versus EAE-VNon-parametricMann–Whitney U test–0.5 (–2.5 to 0.5)*
dEAE score (conditioning cohort), EAE-099 versus EAE-VNon-parametricMann–Whitney U test–1 (–1 to 0)*
eMicroglia SA:volume, EAE-V versus Sham-VNormalOne-way ANOVA, Tukey post hoc–0.98 (–1.54 to –0.43)
fMicroglia SA:volume, EAE-099 versus Sham-VNormalOne-way ANOVA, Tukey post hoc–1.09 (–1.64 to –0.53)
gMicroglia SA:volume, EAE-1134 versus Sham-VNormalOne-way ANOVA, Tukey post hoc–0.81 (–1.33 to –0.28)
hIba1, EAE-099 versus Sham-VNormalOne-way ANOVA, Tukey post hoc0.44 (0.05 to 0.82)
iCD68, EAE-V versus Sham-VNormalOne-way ANOVA, Tukey post hoc0.73 (–0.26 to 1.71)
jiNOS, EAE-V versus Sham-VNormalOne-way ANOVA, Sidak post hoc0.93 (0.29 to 1.57)
kiNOS, EAE-099 versus EAE-VNormalOne-way ANOVA, Sidak post hoc–0.61 (–1.23 to –0.01)
lFcyR1-CD64, EAE-V versus Sham-VNormalOne-way ANOVA, Sidak post hoc0.56 (0.16 to 0.95)
mPro-IL1β, EAE-V versus Sham-VNormalOne-way ANOVA, Sidak post hoc0.87 (–0.02 to 1.77)
nCD86, EAE-099 versus EAE-VNormalOne-way ANOVA, Sidak post hoc–0.22 (–0.39 to –0.05)
oIba1, EAE-V versus Sham-VNormalOne-way ANOVA, Tukey post hoc5.69 (0.63 to 10.75)
pIba1, EAE-099 versus EAE-VNormalOne-way ANOVA, Tukey post hoc7.75 (3.27 to 12.24)
qC1q, EAE-V versus Sham-VNormalOne-way ANOVA, Tukey post hoc2.63 (0.62 to 4.63)
rC1q, EAE-099 versus Sham-VNormalOne-way ANOVA, Tukey post hoc3.01 (1.37 to 4.65)
sNeuronal apoptosis, 100 nM 099 versus vehicle (24 h)NormalOne-way ANOVA, Sidak post hoc–37.0 (–23.2 to –50.8)
tNeuronal apoptosis, 300 nM 099 versus vehicle (24 h)NormalOne-way ANOVA, Sidak post hoc–38.2 (–24.4 to –52.0)
uNeuronal apoptosis, 100 nM 099 versus vehicle (48 h)NormalOne-way ANOVA, Sidak post hoc–40.8 (–27.0 to –54.6)
vNeuronal apoptosis, 300 nM 099 versus vehicle (248 h)NormalOne-way ANOVA, Sidak post hoc–53.9 (–40.1 to –67.7)
wP Ser 73 JUN, 099 versus vehicle (8h)NormalOne-way ANOVA, Sidak post hoc–0.80 (–0.14 to –1.45)
xP Ser 73 JUN, 099 versus vehicle (12h)NormalOne-way ANOVA, Sidak post hoc–0.99 (–0.33 to –1.64)
yContext Δ freeze, EAE-V versus Sham-V (treatment main effect)NormalTwo-way ANOVA, Sidak post hoc–0.33 (–0.61 to –0.05)
zContext Δ freeze, EAE-099 versus EAE-V
(treatment main effect)
NormalTwo-way ANOVA, Sidak post hoc0.32 (0.02 to 0.62)
  • * Mann–Whitney U test results reported for days with greatest mean difference between group scores (IHC cohort: days 5–6; fear conditioning cohort: days 10–12).