Statistics for Figure 6
| Graph | Data structure | Type of test | p |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fig. 6C, bin 1 | Nonparametric | Steel–Dwass | Cont vs 2.5 ng, p = 0.0012; Cont vs 250 pg, p = 0.0021; Cont vs 25 pg, p = 0.0055; Cont vs 2.5 pg, p = 0.7868 |
| Fig. 6C, bin 2 | Nonparametric | Steel–Dwass | Cont vs 2.5 ng, p = 0.4164; Cont vs 250 pg, p = 0.8867; Cont vs 25 pg, p = 1.0000; Cont vs 2.5 pg, p = 0.9924 |
| Fig. 6C, bin 3 | Nonparametric | Steel–Dwass | Cont vs 2.5 ng, p = 0.3094; Cont vs 250 pg, p = 0.9889; Cont vs 25 pg, p = 0.8691; Cont vs 2.5 pg, p = 0.9998 |
| Fig. 6C, bin 4 | Nonparametric | Steel–Dwass | Cont vs 2.5 ng, p = 0.7372; Cont vs 250 pg, p = 0.9700; Cont vs 25 pg, p = 0.3816; Cont vs 2.5 pg, p = 0.9811 |
| Fig. 6C, bin 5 | Nonparametric | Steel–Dwass | Cont vs 2.5 ng, p = 1.0000; Cont vs 250 pg, p = 0.8700; Cont vs 25 pg, p = 1.0000; Cont vs 2.5 pg, p = 0.9986 |
| Fig. 6C, bin 6 | Nonparametric | Steel–Dwass | Cont vs 2.5 ng, p = 0.9278; Cont vs 250 pg, p = 0.6779; Cont vs 25 pg, p = 0.3559; Cont vs 2.5 pg, p = 0.9514 |
| Fig. 6D | Nonparametric | Steel–Dwass | Cont vs 2.5 ng, p = 0.0015; Cont vs 250 pg, p = 0.0015; Cont vs 25 pg, p = 0.0026; Cont vs 2.5 pg, p = 0.5054 |
| Fig. 6E | Nonparametric | Steel–Dwass | Cont vs 2.5 ng, p = 0.0190; Cont vs 250 pg, p = 0.0845; Cont vs 25 pg, p = 1.0000; Cont vs 2.5 pg, p = 0.9994 |