Statistics for Figure 5
| Graph | Data structure | Type of test | p |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fig. 5D, bin 1 | Nonparametric | Steel–Dwass | Cont vs ODN 2088, p = 0.8335; Cont vs pDNA, p = 5.6 × 10−6; pDNA vs. pDNA + ODN 2088, p = 2.4 × 10−4; Cont vs pDNA + ODN 2088, p = 2.1 × 10−5 |
| Fig. 5D, bin 2 | Nonparametric | Steel–Dwass | Cont vs ODN 2088, p = 0.6401; Cont vs pDNA, p = 1.3 × 10−5; pDNA vs. pDNA + ODN 2088, p = 0.0627; Cont vs pDNA + ODN 2088, p = 0.0163 |
| Fig. 5D, bin 3 | Nonparametric | Steel–Dwass | Cont vs ODN 2088, p = 0.9781; Cont vs pDNA, p = 8.2 × 10−5; pDNA vs. pDNA + ODN 2088, p = 4.7 × 10−4; Cont vs pDNA + ODN 2088, p = 0.5691 |
| Fig. 5D, bin 4 | Nonparametric | Steel–Dwass | Cont vs ODN 2088, p = 0.9746; Cont vs pDNA, p = 0.0102; pDNA vs. pDNA + ODN 2088, p = 0.1967; Cont vs pDNA + ODN 2088, p = 0.3568 |
| Fig. 5D, bin 5 | Nonparametric | Steel–Dwass | Cont vs ODN 2088, p = 0.9276; Cont vs pDNA, p = 0.0610; pDNA vs. pDNA + ODN 2088, p = 0.7661; Cont vs pDNA + ODN 2088, p = 0.5053 |
| Fig. 5D, bin 6 | Nonparametric | Steel–Dwass | Cont vs ODN 2088, p = 0.9955; Cont vs pDNA, p = 0.9158; pDNA vs. pDNA + ODN 2088, p = 0.7539; Cont vs pDNA + ODN 2088, p = 0.9840 |
| Fig. 5E | Nonparametric | Steel–Dwass | Cont vs ODN 2088, p = 0.8121; Cont vs pDNA, p = 8.4 × 10−6; pDNA vs. pDNA + ODN 2088, p = 0.0374; Cont vs pDNA + ODN 2088, p = 8.4 × 10−6 |
| Fig. 5F | Nonparametric | Steel–Dwass | Cont vs ODN 2088, p = 0.9966; Cont vs pDNA, p = 0.9982; pDNA vs. pDNA + ODN 2088, p = 0.6688; Cont vs pDNA + ODN 2088, p = 0.7716 |