Table 2.

Mean ± SEM of parameters for basal and apical dendritic single-pulse response (n = 10 rats, each group)

BasalApicalp
Stimulus Intensity (μA)402 ± 49251 ± 66NS
ES onset (ms)3.63 ± 0.213.20 ± 0.19NS
ES slope (mV/mm2)–163 ± 21–383 ± 33<0.001
ES slope ratio (non-θ/θ)1.09 ± 0.021.20 ± 0.04<0.05
PS peak latency (ms)5.60 ± 0.165.65 ± 0.26NS
PS peak amplitude (mV/mm2)299 ± 56549 ± 118<0.03
PS amplitude ratio (non-θ/θ)0.83 ± 0.031.64 ± 0.12<0.001
Curve-fit of PS-θ phase with sum of harmonics
A00.972 ± 0.0130.989 ± 0.004NS
A10.132 ± 0.0260.098 ± 0.0151NS
A2–41.3 ± 11.1°–49.90 ± 8.23°NS
B10.042 ± 0.0070.046 ± 0.008NS
B222.8 ± 19.1°6.7 ± 21.0°NS
B1/A10.36 ± 0.050.60 ± 0.15NS
R20.55 ± 0.060.53 ± 0.07NS
  • PS sink amplitude and ES slope (in CSD units of mV/mm2) were evoked at a stimulus intensity of 1.5 times the PS threshold. The average amplitude/slope measures were determined during a θ state (averaged across all phases) or non-θ state. PS amplitude and ES slope, and their respective ratio in non-θ-to-θ state were statistically different between basal and apical dendritic measures. Scatter plot of single sweep PS (y) with SLM θ phase (x) at stimulus onset, were fitted by equation y = [A0 + A1 sin (π* (x + A2)/180) + B1 sin (π* (x + B2)/90)], where A0 = constant, A1 = 1st harmonic modulation, A2 = 1st harmonic phase shift, B1 = 2nd harmonic modulation, and B2 = 2nd harmonic phase shift. R 2 describes the goodness of fit. Probability (p) of equality between basal and apical groups was tested by unpaired Wilcoxon; NS, non-significant, p > 0.05.