Table 3.

Statistical table

Data structureType of statistical testPower
aDifference between the average variances of the RMPControl vs kynurenic acidPaired t testp = 0.0383
bDifference between the average RMPControl vs kynurenic acidPaired t testn.s. (p = 0.7372)
cDifference between the input resistance (hyperpolarizing vs depolarizing)ControlPaired t testp = 3.3 × 10–12
dTTXPaired t testp = 9.9 × 10–6
eQX-314Paired t testp = 2.3 × 10–4
fDifference between the input resistance for hyperpolarizing current injectionsControl vs TTXOne-way ANOVAn.s. (p = 0.32)
gControl vs QX-314One-way ANOVAp = 5.9 × 10–5
hDifference between the input resistance for depolarizing current injectionsControl vs TTXOne-way ANOVAn.s. (p = 0.42)
iControl vs QX-314One-way ANOVAn.s. (p = 0.07)
jDifference in AHP amplitudeControl vs UCL1684Two-sample t testp = 0.0003
kControl vs EBIOTwo-sample t testp = 0.001
lDifference in AHP area under the curveControl vs UCL1684Two-sample t testp = 0.0002
mControl vs EBIOTwo-sample t testp = 0.00002
nDifference in DL neuron current-evoked spiking rateControl vs UCL1684Two-way ANOVAp = 0.0013
oControl vs EBIOTwo-way ANOVAp = 0.000092
pControl vs BAPTATwo-way ANOVAp = 1.5 × 10–15
qUCL1684 vs BAPTATwo-way ANOVAp = 0.00063
rDifference in DL neuron current-evoked spike heightControl vs BAPTATwo-way ANOVAp = 2.1 × 10–12
sUCL1684 vs BAPTATwo-way ANOVA1.6 × 10–6
tControl vs UCL1684Two-way ANOVAn.s. (p = 0.14)
uDifference in DL neuron current-evoked spike widthControl vs BAPTATwo-way ANOVAp = 1.3 × 10–31
vUCL1684 vs BAPTATwo-way ANOVAp = 3.7 × 10–10
wControl vs UCL1684
(first 3 spikes only)
Two-way ANOVAn.s. (p = 0.24)
xAHP reduction between first and second spikeNon-burst spike pairsOne sample t testp = 4.45 × 10–27
yInitial burst spike pairsOne sample t testp = 1.26 × 10–13
zSpike threshold increase between first and second spikeNon-burst spike pairOne sample t testp = 1.24 × 10–22
aaInitial burst spike pairsOne sample t testp = 8.30 × 10–28
  • n.s. = not significant.