RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Inverted Encoding Models Assay Population-Level Stimulus Representations, Not Single-Unit Neural Tuning
JF eneuro
JO eNeuro
FD Society for Neuroscience
SP ENEURO.0098-18.2018
DO 10.1523/ENEURO.0098-18.2018
A1 Sprague, Thomas C.
A1 Adam, Kirsten C. S.
A1 Foster, Joshua J.
A1 Rahmati, Masih
A1 Sutterer, David W.
A1 Vo, Vy A.
YR 2018
UL http://www.eneuro.org/content/early/2018/05/11/ENEURO.0098-18.2018.abstract
AB Significance Statement Inverted encoding models (IEMs) are a powerful tool for reconstructing population-level stimulus representations from aggregate measurements of neural activity (e.g., fMRI or EEG). In a recent report, Liu et al., (2018) tested whether IEMs can provide information about the underlying tuning of single units. Here, we argue that using stimulus reconstructions to infer properties of single neurons, such as neural tuning bandwidth, is an ill-posed problem with no unambiguous solution. Instead of interpreting results from these methods as evidence about single-unit tuning, we emphasize the utility of these methods for assaying population-level stimulus representations. These can be compared across task conditions to better constrain theories of large-scale neural information processing across experimental manipulations, such as changing sensory input or attention.