TY - JOUR T1 - Sulcal Polymorphisms of the IFC and ACC Contribute to Inhibitory Control Variability in Children and Adults JF - eneuro JO - eNeuro DO - 10.1523/ENEURO.0197-17.2018 VL - 5 IS - 1 SP - ENEURO.0197-17.2018 AU - Cloélia Tissier AU - Adriano Linzarini AU - Geneviève Allaire-Duquette AU - Katell Mevel AU - Nicolas Poirel AU - Sonia Dollfus AU - Olivier Etard AU - François Orliac AU - Carole Peyrin AU - Sylvain Charron AU - Armin Raznahan AU - Olivier Houdé AU - Grégoire Borst AU - Arnaud Cachia Y1 - 2018/01/01 UR - http://www.eneuro.org/content/5/1/ENEURO.0197-17.2018.abstract N2 - Inhibitory control (IC) is a core executive function that enables humans to resist habits, temptations, or distractions. IC efficiency in childhood is a strong predictor of academic and professional success later in life. Based on analysis of the sulcal pattern, a qualitative feature of cortex anatomy determined during fetal life and stable during development, we searched for evidence that interindividual differences in IC partly trace back to prenatal processes. Using anatomical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), we analyzed the sulcal pattern of two key regions of the IC neural network, the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and the inferior frontal cortex (IFC), which limits the inferior frontal gyrus. We found that the sulcal pattern asymmetry of both the ACC and IFC contributes to IC (Stroop score) in children and adults: participants with asymmetrical ACC or IFC sulcal patterns had better IC efficiency than participants with symmetrical ACC or IFC sulcal patterns. Such additive effects of IFC and ACC sulcal patterns on IC efficiency suggest that distinct early neurodevelopmental mechanisms targeting different brain regions likely contribute to IC efficiency. This view shares some analogies with the “common variant–small effect” model in genetics, which states that frequent genetic polymorphisms have small effects but collectively account for a large portion of the variance. Similarly, each sulcal polymorphism has a small but additive effect: IFC and ACC sulcal patterns, respectively, explained 3% and 14% of the variance of the Stroop interference scores. ER -