PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - van der Wijk, Gwen AU - Zamyadi, Mojdeh AU - Bray, Signe AU - Hassel, Stefanie AU - Arnott, Stephen R. AU - Frey, Benicio N. AU - Kennedy, Sidney H. AU - Davis, Andrew D. AU - Hall, Geoffrey B. AU - Lam, Raymond W. AU - Milev, Roumen AU - Müller, Daniel J. AU - Parikh, Sagar AU - Soares, Claudio AU - Macqueen, Glenda M. AU - Strother, Stephen C. AU - Protzner, Andrea B. TI - Large Individual Differences in Functional Connectivity in the Context of Major Depression and Antidepressant Pharmacotherapy AID - 10.1523/ENEURO.0286-23.2024 DP - 2024 Jun 01 TA - eneuro PG - ENEURO.0286-23.2024 VI - 11 IP - 6 4099 - http://www.eneuro.org/content/11/6/ENEURO.0286-23.2024.short 4100 - http://www.eneuro.org/content/11/6/ENEURO.0286-23.2024.full SO - eNeuro2024 Jun 01; 11 AB - Clinical studies of major depression (MD) generally focus on group effects, yet interindividual differences in brain function are increasingly recognized as important and may even impact effect sizes related to group effects. Here, we examine the magnitude of individual differences in relation to group differences that are commonly investigated (e.g., related to MD diagnosis and treatment response). Functional MRI data from 107 participants (63 female, 44 male) were collected at baseline, 2, and 8 weeks during which patients received pharmacotherapy (escitalopram, N = 68) and controls (N = 39) received no intervention. The unique contributions of different sources of variation were examined by calculating how much variance in functional connectivity was shared across all participants and sessions, within/across groups (patients vs controls, responders vs nonresponders, female vs male participants), recording sessions, and individuals. Individual differences and common connectivity across groups, sessions, and participants contributed most to the explained variance (>95% across analyses). Group differences related to MD diagnosis, treatment response, and biological sex made significant but small contributions (0.3–1.2%). High individual variation was present in cognitive control and attention areas, while low individual variation characterized primary sensorimotor regions. Group differences were much smaller than individual differences in the context of MD and its treatment. These results could be linked to the variable findings and difficulty translating research on MD to clinical practice. Future research should examine brain features with low and high individual variation in relation to psychiatric symptoms and treatment trajectories to explore the clinical relevance of the individual differences identified here.