RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Food restriction level and reinforcement schedule differentially influence behavior during acquisition and devaluation procedures in mice
JF eneuro
JO eNeuro
FD Society for Neuroscience
SP ENEURO.0063-23.2023
DO 10.1523/ENEURO.0063-23.2023
A1 Chevée, Maxime
A1 Kim, Courtney J.
A1 Crow, Nevin
A1 Follman, Emma G.
A1 Leonard, Michael Z.
A1 Calipari, Erin S.
YR 2023
UL http://www.eneuro.org/content/early/2023/09/11/ENEURO.0063-23.2023.abstract
AB Behavioral strategies are often classified based on whether reinforcer value controls reinforcement. Value-sensitive behaviors, in which animals update their actions when reinforcer value is changed, are classified as goal-directed; conversely, value-insensitive actions, where behavior remains consistent when the reinforcer is removed or devalued, are considered habitual. Basic reinforcement principles can help to bias behavior toward either process: random ratio (RR) schedules are thought to promote the formation of goal-directed behaviors while random intervals (RI) promote habitual control. However, how the schedule-specific features of these tasks interact with other factors that influence learning to control behavior has not been well characterized. Using male and female mice, we asked how distinct food restriction levels, a strategy often used to increase task engagement, interact with RR and RI schedules to control performance during task acquisition and devaluation procedures. We determined that food restriction level has a stronger effect on the behavior of mice following RR schedules compared to RI schedules, and that it promotes a decrease in response rate during devaluation procedures that is best explained by the effects of extinction rather than devaluation. Surprisingly, food restriction accelerated the decrease in response rates observed following devaluation across sequential extinction sessions, but not within a single session. Our results support the idea that the relationships between schedules and control strategies are not clear-cut and suggest that an animal’s engagement in a task must be accounted for, together with the structure of reinforcement schedules, to appropriately interpret the cognitive underpinnings of behavior.Significance StatementUnderstanding the basic learning principles that control behavior is essential to developing therapies for psychiatric disorders such as addiction or obsessive-compulsive disorder. Reinforcement schedules are thought to control the reliance on habitual versus goal-directed control during adaptive behaviors. However, external factors that are independent of training schedules also influence behavior, for example, by modulating motivation or energy balance. In this study, we find that food restriction levels are at least equally important as reinforcement schedules in shaping behavioral output. Our results add to a growing body of work which supports the argument for a nuanced distinction between habitual and goal-directed behavior.