glm for MI per mouse per odor pair for PAC Theta Beta hippocampus mdl = Generalized linear regression model: MI ~ 1 + naive_vs_proficient*rewarded_vs_unrewarded Distribution = Normal Estimated Coefficients: Estimate SE tStat pValue __________ __________ _______ __________ (Intercept) 0.0031549 0.00015808 19.957 6.6224e-48 naive_vs_proficient_2 0.00018962 0.00022356 0.84816 0.39745 rewarded_vs_unrewarded_2 0.0024193 0.00022356 10.822 1.9562e-21 naive_vs_proficient_2:rewarded_vs_unrewarded_2 -0.0022613 0.00031617 -7.1522 1.9545e-11 188 observations, 184 error degrees of freedom Estimated Dispersion: 1.17e-06 F-statistic vs. constant model: 51, p-value = 4.83e-24 Ranksum or t-test p values for MI per mouse per odor pair for PAC Theta Beta hippocampus pFDR = 3.333333e-02 p value t-test for S+ Proficient vs S- Proficient = 7.797114e-13 p value ranksum for S+ Naive vs S- Proficient = 1.920613e-12 p value ranksum for S- Naive vs S- Proficient = 1.240086e-11 p value t-test for S+ Proficient vs S- Naive = 7.767986e-03 p values below are > pFDR p value ranksum for S+ Naive vs S- Naive = 2.442082e-01 p value ranksum for S+ Naive vs S+ Proficient = 3.681915e-01 Nested ANOVAN for MI during odor per mouse per odor pair for Beta for hippocampus Source Sum Sq. d.f. Singular? Mean Sq. F Prob>F naive_vs_proficient 0.00004 1.00000 0.00000 0.00004 49.29883 0.00000 rewarded_vs_unrewarded 0.00008 1.00000 0.00000 0.00008 92.42869 0.00000 mouse_no(naive_vs_proficient,rewarded_vs_unrewarded) 0.00008 20.00000 0.00000 0.00000 4.76588 0.00000 naive_vs_proficient*rewarded_vs_unrewarded 0.00006 1.00000 0.00000 0.00006 71.34082 0.00000 Error 0.00014 164.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Total 0.00040 187.00000 0.00000 glm for delta PA variance per mouse per odor pair for PAC Theta Beta hippocampus mdl = Generalized linear regression model: MI ~ 1 + perCorr*event Distribution = Normal Estimated Coefficients: Estimate SE tStat pValue ___________ ______ ___________ __________ (Intercept) -1.2437e-13 43.078 -2.8871e-15 1 perCorr_2 137.01 60.922 2.249 0.025698 event_2 453.77 60.922 7.4484 3.5458e-12 perCorr_2:event_2 -394.53 86.156 -4.5792 8.5767e-06 188 observations, 184 error degrees of freedom Estimated Dispersion: 8.72e+04 F-statistic vs. constant model: 19.5, p-value = 5.29e-11 Ranksum or t-test p values for delta PA variance per mouse per odor pair for PAC Theta Beta hippocampus pFDR = 3.333333e-02 p value t-test for S+ Proficient vs S- Proficient = 6.113224e-12 p value ranksum for S+ Naive vs S- Proficient = 3.351043e-09 p value ranksum for S- Naive vs S- Proficient = 2.557364e-06 p value t-test for S+ Proficient vs S- Naive = 3.120705e-04 p values below are > pFDR p value ranksum for S+ Naive vs S+ Proficient = 5.381973e-02 p value ranksum for S+ Naive vs S- Naive = 2.728707e-01 Nested ANOVAN for PA variance during odor per mouse per odor pair for Beta for hippocampus Source Sum Sq. d.f. Singular? Mean Sq. F Prob>F naive_vs_proficient 235984.54269 1.00000 0.00000 235984.54269 3.93702 0.04890 rewarded_vs_unrewarded 3038984.48237 1.00000 0.00000 3038984.48237 50.70058 0.00000 mouse_no(naive_vs_proficient,rewarded_vs_unrewarded) 6218169.27925 20.00000 0.00000 310908.46396 5.18701 0.00000 naive_vs_proficient*rewarded_vs_unrewarded 1782417.51756 1.00000 0.00000 1782417.51756 29.73678 0.00000 Error 9830133.24930 164.00000 0.00000 59939.83689 Total 21140223.66163 187.00000 0.00000 glm for PA variance per mouse for PAC Theta/Beta hippocampus glm for average MI per mouse per odor pair for PAC ThetaBeta prefrontal mdl = Generalized linear regression model: MI ~ 1 + perCorr*event Distribution = Normal Estimated Coefficients: Estimate SE tStat pValue __________ __________ _______ __________ (Intercept) 0.0028981 0.0001684 17.21 3.5174e-40 perCorr_2 0.00032405 0.00023815 1.3607 0.17528 event_2 0.0030285 0.00023815 12.717 5.3976e-27 perCorr_2:event_2 -0.0027846 0.0003368 -8.2678 2.6573e-14 188 observations, 184 error degrees of freedom Estimated Dispersion: 1.33e-06 F-statistic vs. constant model: 67.7, p-value = 1.55e-29 Ranksum or t-test p values for average MI per mouse per odor pair for PAC ThetaBeta prefrontal pFDR = 3.333333e-02 p value t-test for S+ Proficient vs S- Proficient = 1.386178e-15 p value ranksum for S+ Naive vs S- Proficient = 1.670146e-13 p value ranksum for S- Naive vs S- Proficient = 1.059721e-11 p value t-test for S+ Proficient vs S- Naive = 2.823597e-04 p values below are > pFDR p value ranksum for S+ Naive vs S+ Proficient = 1.266358e-01 p value ranksum for S+ Naive vs S- Naive = 2.012631e-01 Nested ANOVAN for MI during odor per mouse per odor pair for Beta for prefrontal Source Sum Sq. d.f. Singular? Mean Sq. F Prob>F naive_vs_proficient 0.00005 1.00000 0.00000 0.00005 55.07353 0.00000 rewarded_vs_unrewarded 0.00012 1.00000 0.00000 0.00012 130.55929 0.00000 mouse_no(naive_vs_proficient,rewarded_vs_unrewarded) 0.00009 20.00000 0.00000 0.00000 4.81554 0.00000 naive_vs_proficient*rewarded_vs_unrewarded 0.00009 1.00000 0.00000 0.00009 94.41781 0.00000 Error 0.00015 164.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Total 0.00052 187.00000 0.00000 glm for delta PA variance per mouse per odor pair for PAC ThetaBeta prefrontal mdl = Generalized linear regression model: MI ~ 1 + perCorr*event Distribution = Normal Estimated Coefficients: Estimate SE tStat pValue ___________ ______ __________ __________ (Intercept) -6.6332e-14 41.097 -1.614e-15 1 perCorr_2 154.69 58.12 2.6615 0.0084675 event_2 450.58 58.12 7.7525 5.9321e-13 perCorr_2:event_2 -398.75 82.195 -4.8513 2.6046e-06 188 observations, 184 error degrees of freedom Estimated Dispersion: 7.94e+04 F-statistic vs. constant model: 20.7, p-value = 1.34e-11 Ranksum or t-test p values for delta PA variance per mouse per odor pair for PAC ThetaBeta prefrontal pFDR = 4.166667e-02 p value t-test for S+ Proficient vs S- Proficient = 9.601489e-11 p value ranksum for S+ Naive vs S- Proficient = 4.409906e-09 p value ranksum for S- Naive vs S- Proficient = 3.190279e-07 p value t-test for S+ Proficient vs S- Naive = 5.081957e-04 p value ranksum for S+ Naive vs S+ Proficient = 3.897991e-02 p values below are > pFDR p value ranksum for S+ Naive vs S- Naive = 5.252982e-01 Nested ANOVAN for PA variance during odor per mouse per odor pair for Beta for prefrontal Source Sum Sq. d.f. Singular? Mean Sq. F Prob>F naive_vs_proficient 148728.95369 1.00000 0.00000 148728.95369 2.85216 0.09315 rewarded_vs_unrewarded 2900775.15201 1.00000 0.00000 2900775.15201 55.62792 0.00000 mouse_no(naive_vs_proficient,rewarded_vs_unrewarded) 6054413.12835 20.00000 0.00000 302720.65642 5.80525 0.00000 naive_vs_proficient*rewarded_vs_unrewarded 1838730.34762 1.00000 0.00000 1838730.34762 35.26118 0.00000 Error 8551948.71214 164.00000 0.00000 52146.02873 Total 19534322.30086 187.00000 0.00000 glm for average MI per mouse per odor pair for PAC ThetaBeta prefrontal and hippocampus mdl = Generalized linear regression model: MI ~ 1 + perCorr*event Distribution = Normal Estimated Coefficients: Estimate SE tStat pValue __________ __________ _______ __________ (Intercept) 0.0028981 0.0001684 17.21 3.5174e-40 perCorr_2 0.00032405 0.00023815 1.3607 0.17528 event_2 0.0030285 0.00023815 12.717 5.3976e-27 perCorr_2:event_2 -0.0027846 0.0003368 -8.2678 2.6573e-14 188 observations, 184 error degrees of freedom Estimated Dispersion: 1.33e-06 F-statistic vs. constant model: 67.7, p-value = 1.55e-29 glm for delta PA variance per mouse per odor pair for PAC Theta Beta prefrontal and hippocampus mdl = Generalized linear regression model: PA ~ [Linear formula with 8 terms in 3 predictors] Distribution = Normal Estimated Coefficients: Estimate SE tStat pValue ___________ ______ ___________ __________ (Intercept) -1.5456e-12 42.099 -3.6712e-14 1 brain_region_2 1.5433e-12 59.537 2.5922e-14 1 perCorr_2 137.01 59.537 2.3013 0.021934 event_2 453.77 59.537 7.6216 2.1493e-13 brain_region_2:perCorr_2 17.674 84.199 0.20991 0.83385 brain_region_2:event_2 -3.1924 84.199 -0.037915 0.96978 perCorr_2:event_2 -394.53 84.199 -4.6857 3.9336e-06 brain_region_2:perCorr_2:event_2 -4.2224 119.07 -0.03546 0.97173 376 observations, 368 error degrees of freedom Estimated Dispersion: 8.33e+04 F-statistic vs. constant model: 17.2, p-value = 1.1e-19 glm for MI per mouse per odor pair for PAC Theta High gamma hippocampus mdl = Generalized linear regression model: MI ~ 1 + naive_vs_proficient*rewarded_vs_unrewarded Distribution = Normal Estimated Coefficients: Estimate SE tStat pValue ___________ __________ _________ __________ (Intercept) 0.0094675 0.00049103 19.281 4.8855e-46 naive_vs_proficient_2 -0.0010618 0.00069442 -1.5291 0.12796 rewarded_vs_unrewarded_2 -0.00042541 0.00069442 -0.61261 0.54089 naive_vs_proficient_2:rewarded_vs_unrewarded_2 -3.7563e-05 0.00098206 -0.038249 0.96953 188 observations, 184 error degrees of freedom Estimated Dispersion: 1.13e-05 F-statistic vs. constant model: 1.89, p-value = 0.133 Ranksum or t-test p values for MI per mouse per odor pair for PAC Theta High gamma hippocampus pFDR = 5.000000e-02 p values below are > pFDR p value ranksum for S- Naive vs S- Proficient = 1.529470e-01 p value ranksum for S+ Proficient vs S- Naive = 2.177288e-01 p value ranksum for S+ Naive vs S+ Proficient = 2.863206e-01 p value ranksum for S+ Naive vs S- Proficient = 3.002113e-01 p value ranksum for S+ Naive vs S- Naive = 7.738426e-01 p value ranksum for S+ Proficient vs S- Proficient = 9.577850e-01 Nested ANOVAN for MI during odor per mouse per odor pair for High gamma for hippocampus Source Sum Sq. d.f. Singular? Mean Sq. F Prob>F naive_vs_proficient 0.00005 1.00000 0.00000 0.00005 10.41178 0.00151 rewarded_vs_unrewarded 0.00001 1.00000 0.00000 0.00001 1.66388 0.19890 mouse_no(naive_vs_proficient,rewarded_vs_unrewarded) 0.00124 20.00000 0.00000 0.00006 12.08644 0.00000 naive_vs_proficient*rewarded_vs_unrewarded 0.00000 1.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00800 0.92883 Error 0.00084 164.00000 0.00000 0.00001 Total 0.00215 187.00000 0.00000 glm for delta PA variance per mouse per odor pair for PAC Theta High gamma hippocampus mdl = Generalized linear regression model: MI ~ 1 + perCorr*event Distribution = Normal Estimated Coefficients: Estimate SE tStat pValue ___________ ______ ___________ __________ (Intercept) -8.2915e-14 49.929 -1.6607e-15 1 perCorr_2 167.47 70.61 2.3718 0.018733 event_2 576.79 70.61 8.1687 4.863e-14 perCorr_2:event_2 -498.03 99.857 -4.9874 1.4093e-06 188 observations, 184 error degrees of freedom Estimated Dispersion: 1.17e+05 F-statistic vs. constant model: 23.5, p-value = 6.05e-13 Ranksum or t-test p values for delta PA variance per mouse per odor pair for PAC Theta High gamma hippocampus pFDR = 4.166667e-02 p value ranksum for S+ Proficient vs S- Proficient = 2.345178e-13 p value ranksum for S+ Naive vs S- Proficient = 1.672018e-09 p value ranksum for S- Naive vs S- Proficient = 2.293765e-08 p value ranksum for S+ Proficient vs S- Naive = 1.117351e-03 p value ranksum for S+ Naive vs S+ Proficient = 2.941889e-02 p values below are > pFDR p value ranksum for S+ Naive vs S- Naive = 2.039424e-01 Nested ANOVAN for PA variance during odor per mouse per odor pair for High gamma for hippocampus Source Sum Sq. d.f. Singular? Mean Sq. F Prob>F naive_vs_proficient 377830.28560 1.00000 0.00000 377830.28560 3.64474 0.05799 rewarded_vs_unrewarded 4992941.18088 1.00000 0.00000 4992941.18088 48.16442 0.00000 mouse_no(naive_vs_proficient,rewarded_vs_unrewarded) 4557294.66831 20.00000 0.00000 227864.73342 2.19810 0.00370 naive_vs_proficient*rewarded_vs_unrewarded 2886814.21694 1.00000 0.00000 2886814.21694 27.84766 0.00000 Error 17000980.19601 164.00000 0.00000 103664.51339 Total 29834585.59852 187.00000 0.00000 glm for PA variance per mouse for PAC Theta/High gamma hippocampus glm for average MI per mouse per odor pair for PAC ThetaHigh gamma prefrontal mdl = Generalized linear regression model: MI ~ 1 + perCorr*event Distribution = Normal Estimated Coefficients: Estimate SE tStat pValue ___________ __________ ________ __________ (Intercept) 0.010829 0.00062328 17.374 1.1908e-40 perCorr_2 -0.0014597 0.00088145 -1.656 0.09943 event_2 -0.00050062 0.00088145 -0.56795 0.57076 perCorr_2:event_2 6.3958e-05 0.0012466 0.051307 0.95914 188 observations, 184 error degrees of freedom Estimated Dispersion: 1.83e-05 F-statistic vs. constant model: 1.94, p-value = 0.125 Ranksum or t-test p values for average MI per mouse per odor pair for PAC ThetaHigh gamma prefrontal pFDR = 8.333333e-03 p values below are > pFDR p value ranksum for S- Naive vs S- Proficient = 2.067093e-02 p value ranksum for S+ Naive vs S- Proficient = 3.115075e-02 p value ranksum for S+ Naive vs S+ Proficient = 4.360529e-01 p value ranksum for S+ Proficient vs S- Naive = 5.252982e-01 p value ranksum for S+ Proficient vs S- Proficient = 5.352079e-01 p value ranksum for S+ Naive vs S- Naive = 9.156882e-01 Nested ANOVAN for MI during odor per mouse per odor pair for High gamma for prefrontal Source Sum Sq. d.f. Singular? Mean Sq. F Prob>F naive_vs_proficient 0.00009 1.00000 0.00000 0.00009 13.59660 0.00031 rewarded_vs_unrewarded 0.00001 1.00000 0.00000 0.00001 1.43525 0.23264 mouse_no(naive_vs_proficient,rewarded_vs_unrewarded) 0.00227 20.00000 0.00000 0.00011 17.08350 0.00000 naive_vs_proficient*rewarded_vs_unrewarded 0.00000 1.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00468 0.94555 Error 0.00109 164.00000 0.00000 0.00001 Total 0.00347 187.00000 0.00000 glm for delta PA variance per mouse per odor pair for PAC ThetaHigh gamma prefrontal mdl = Generalized linear regression model: MI ~ 1 + perCorr*event Distribution = Normal Estimated Coefficients: Estimate SE tStat pValue ___________ ______ ___________ __________ (Intercept) -2.9849e-13 57.054 -5.2317e-15 1 perCorr_2 219.68 80.687 2.7226 0.0071007 event_2 700.77 80.687 8.685 2.0188e-15 perCorr_2:event_2 -644.45 114.11 -5.6477 6.0844e-08 188 observations, 184 error degrees of freedom Estimated Dispersion: 1.53e+05 F-statistic vs. constant model: 26.4, p-value = 3.06e-14 Ranksum or t-test p values for delta PA variance per mouse per odor pair for PAC ThetaHigh gamma prefrontal pFDR = 4.166667e-02 p value ranksum for S+ Proficient vs S- Proficient = 4.596019e-13 p value t-test for S+ Naive vs S- Proficient = 2.028798e-10 p value ranksum for S- Naive vs S- Proficient = 1.038252e-08 p value t-test for S+ Naive vs S+ Proficient = 3.343391e-03 p value ranksum for S+ Proficient vs S- Naive = 9.494049e-03 p values below are > pFDR p value t-test for S+ Naive vs S- Naive = 1.275239e-01 Nested ANOVAN for PA variance during odor per mouse per odor pair for High gamma for prefrontal Source Sum Sq. d.f. Singular? Mean Sq. F Prob>F naive_vs_proficient 561282.37558 1.00000 0.00000 561282.37558 4.70113 0.03158 rewarded_vs_unrewarded 6617598.65889 1.00000 0.00000 6617598.65889 55.42699 0.00000 mouse_no(naive_vs_proficient,rewarded_vs_unrewarded) 8570447.08664 20.00000 0.00000 428522.35433 3.58917 0.00000 naive_vs_proficient*rewarded_vs_unrewarded 4835360.64760 1.00000 0.00000 4835360.64760 40.49951 0.00000 Error 19580464.42975 164.00000 0.00000 119393.07579 Total 40260020.61198 187.00000 0.00000 glm for average MI per mouse per odor pair for PAC ThetaHigh gamma prefrontal and hippocampus mdl = Generalized linear regression model: MI ~ 1 + perCorr*event Distribution = Normal Estimated Coefficients: Estimate SE tStat pValue ___________ __________ ________ __________ (Intercept) 0.010829 0.00062328 17.374 1.1908e-40 perCorr_2 -0.0014597 0.00088145 -1.656 0.09943 event_2 -0.00050062 0.00088145 -0.56795 0.57076 perCorr_2:event_2 6.3958e-05 0.0012466 0.051307 0.95914 188 observations, 184 error degrees of freedom Estimated Dispersion: 1.83e-05 F-statistic vs. constant model: 1.94, p-value = 0.125 glm for delta PA variance per mouse per odor pair for PAC Theta High gamma prefrontal and hippocampus mdl = Generalized linear regression model: PA ~ [Linear formula with 8 terms in 3 predictors] Distribution = Normal Estimated Coefficients: Estimate SE tStat pValue ___________ ______ ___________ __________ (Intercept) -1.4621e-12 53.61 -2.7274e-14 1 brain_region_2 1.1654e-12 75.816 1.5371e-14 1 perCorr_2 167.47 75.816 2.2089 0.027794 event_2 576.79 75.816 7.6077 2.3581e-13 brain_region_2:perCorr_2 52.203 107.22 0.48688 0.62664 brain_region_2:event_2 123.98 107.22 1.1563 0.24829 perCorr_2:event_2 -498.03 107.22 -4.6449 4.7433e-06 brain_region_2:perCorr_2:event_2 -146.42 151.63 -0.96566 0.33485 376 observations, 368 error degrees of freedom Estimated Dispersion: 1.35e+05 F-statistic vs. constant model: 21.8, p-value = 1.23e-24