Abstract
Reported associations between functional connectivity and affective disorder symptoms are minimally reproducible, which can partially be attributed to difficulty capturing highly variable clinical symptoms in cross-sectional study designs. ‘Dense sampling’ protocols, where participants are sampled across multiple sessions, can overcome this limitation by studying associations between functional connectivity and variable clinical states. Here, we characterized effect sizes for the association between functional connectivity and time-varying positive and negative daily affect in a non-clinical cohort. Data were analysed from 24 adults who attended four research visits, where participants self-reported daily affect using the PANAS-X questionnaire and completed 39 minutes of functional magnetic resonance imaging across three passive viewing conditions. We modeled positive and negative daily affect in relation to network-level functional connectivity, with hypotheses regarding within-network connectivity of the default mode, salience/cingulo-opercular, frontoparietal, dorsal attention, and visual networks and between-network connectivity of affective subcortical regions (amygdala and nucleus accumbens) with both default mode and salience/cingulo-opercular networks. Effect sizes for associations between affect and network-level functional connectivity were small and non-significant across analyses. We additionally report that functional connectivity variance is largely attributable to individual identity with small relative variance (< 3%) accounted for by within-subject daily affect variation. These results support previous reports that functional connectivity is dominated by stable subject-specific connectivity patterns, while additionally suggesting relatively minimal influence of day-to-day affect. Researchers planning studies examining functional connectivity in relation to daily affect, or other varying stable states, should therefore anticipate small effect sizes and carefully consider power in study planning.
Significance Statement Brain functional connectivity has been suggested as an affective disorder biomarker, but inconsistent results may be related to affective disorder symptoms varying greatly over short time periods. We used a method called ‘dense sampling’, where participants are measured at multiple sessions, to characterize how brain functional connectivity and affect vary within people over time. We studied 24 adults who attended four research visits, where they reported feelings of daily affect (mood) and functional connectivity was measured with a MRI scan. We found that functional connectivity most strongly related to individual differences with minimal influences of daily affect. Future applications of dense sampling to assess variable clinical and non-clinical states must carefully consider study design in anticipation of small effects.
Footnotes
Authors report no conflict of interest
Signe Bray received funding from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) and Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC). Ashley D. Harris received funding from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC). Kate J. Godfrey received funding from the Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute and Hotchkiss Brain Institute.
*denotes equal contribution
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.
