Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research Article: New Research, Sensory and Motor Systems

Auditory and visual gratings elicit distinct gamma responses (8 words).

Divya Gulati and Supratim Ray
eNeuro 11 April 2024, ENEURO.0116-24.2024; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0116-24.2024
Divya Gulati
1Centre for Neuroscience, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, India, 560012
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Supratim Ray
1Centre for Neuroscience, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, India, 560012
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Sensory stimulation is often accompanied by fluctuations at high frequencies (>30Hz) in brain signals. These could be “narrowband” oscillations in the gamma band (30-70 Hz) or non-oscillatory “broadband” high-gamma (70-150 Hz) activity. Narrowband gamma oscillations, which are induced by presenting some visual stimuli such as gratings and have been shown to weaken with healthy aging and the onset of Alzheimer's Disease, hold promise as potential biomarkers. However, since delivering visual stimuli is cumbersome as it requires head stabilization for eye tracking, an equivalent auditory paradigm could be useful. Although simple auditory stimuli have been shown to produce high-gamma activity, whether specific auditory stimuli can also produce narrowband gamma oscillations is unknown. We tested whether auditory ripple stimuli, which are considered an analogue to visual gratings, could elicit narrowband oscillations in auditory areas. We recorded 64-channel EEG from male and female (18 each) subjects while they either fixated on the monitor while passively viewing static visual gratings, or listened to stationary and moving ripples, played using loudspeakers, with their eyes open or closed. We found that while visual gratings induced narrowband gamma oscillations with suppression in the alpha band (8–12Hz), auditory ripples did not produce narrowband gamma but instead elicited very strong broadband high-gamma response and suppression in the beta band (14-26Hz). Even though we used equivalent stimuli in both modalities, our findings indicate that the underlying neuronal circuitry may not share ubiquitous strategies for stimulus processing.

Significance statement In the visual cortex, gratings can induce robust narrowband gamma oscillations (30-70Hz). These visual stimulus-induced oscillations can further be used as a biomarker for diagnosing neuronal disorders. However, tasks used to elicit these oscillations are challenging for elderly subjects, and therefore, we tested if we could use auditory stimuli instead. We hypothesized that auditory ripple stimuli, which are analogous to visual gratings, may elicit these narrowband oscillations. We found that ripples induce a broadband high-gamma response (70-150Hz) in human EEG, unlike visual gratings that produce robust gamma. Thus, the underlying neural circuitry in the two areas may not be canonical.

Footnotes

  • No, The authors declare no competing financial interests.

  • This work was supported by Wellcome Trust/DBT India Alliance (Senior fellowship IA/S/18/2/504003 to S.R.) and DBT-IISc Partnership Programme. D.G. is thankful for the support from the senior research fellowship awarded by the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR).

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

Back to top
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Auditory and visual gratings elicit distinct gamma responses (8 words).
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Auditory and visual gratings elicit distinct gamma responses (8 words).
Divya Gulati, Supratim Ray
eNeuro 11 April 2024, ENEURO.0116-24.2024; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0116-24.2024

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Auditory and visual gratings elicit distinct gamma responses (8 words).
Divya Gulati, Supratim Ray
eNeuro 11 April 2024, ENEURO.0116-24.2024; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0116-24.2024
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: New Research

  • Robust representation and nonlinear spectral integration of harmonic stacks in layer 4 of mouse primary auditory cortex
  • Changes in palatability processing across the estrous cycle are modulated by hypothalamic estradiol signaling
  • Automatic, but not autonomous: Implicit adaptation is modulated by goal-directed attentional demands
Show more Research Article: New Research

Sensory and Motor Systems

  • Robust representation and nonlinear spectral integration of harmonic stacks in layer 4 of mouse primary auditory cortex
  • Changes in palatability processing across the estrous cycle are modulated by hypothalamic estradiol signaling
  • Automatic, but not autonomous: Implicit adaptation is modulated by goal-directed attentional demands
Show more Sensory and Motor Systems

Subjects

  • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2026 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.