Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Methods/New Tools, Novel Tools and Methods

A general framework for inferring Bayesian ideal observer models from psychophysical data

Tyler S. Manning, Benjamin N. Naecker, Iona R. McLean, Bas Rokers, Jonathan W. Pillow and Emily A. Cooper
eNeuro 31 October 2022, ENEURO.0144-22.2022; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0144-22.2022
Tyler S. Manning
1Herbert Wertheim School of Optometry & Vision Science, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Tyler S. Manning
Benjamin N. Naecker
2Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Iona R. McLean
1Herbert Wertheim School of Optometry & Vision Science, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bas Rokers
3Psychology, New York University - Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, UAE
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Bas Rokers
Jonathan W. Pillow
4Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emily A. Cooper
5Herbert Wertheim School of Optometry & Vision Science, Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Emily A. Cooper
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

A central question in neuroscience is how sensory inputs are transformed into percepts. At this point, it is clear that this process is strongly influenced by prior knowledge of the sensory environment. Bayesian ideal observer models provide a key link between data and theory that can help researchers evaluate how prior knowledge is represented and integrated with incoming sensory information. However, the statistical prior employed by a Bayesian observer cannot be measured directly, and must instead be inferred from behavioral measurements. Here we review the general problem of inferring priors from psychophysical data, and the simple solution that follows from assuming a prior that is a Gaussian probability distribution. As our understanding of sensory processing advances, however, there is an increasing need for methods to flexibly recover the shape of Bayesian priors that are not well-approximated by elementary functions. To address this issue, we describe a novel approach that applies to arbitrary prior shapes, which we parameterize using mixtures of Gaussian distributions. After incorporating a simple approximation, this method produces an analytical solution for psychophysical quantities that can be numerically optimized to recover the shapes of Bayesian priors. This approach offers advantages in flexibility, while still providing an analytical framework for many scenarios. We provide a MATLAB toolbox implementing key computations described herein.

Significance statement

Models in neuroscience provide an essential tool for developing and testing hypotheses about how the brain works. Here, we review the canonical application of Bayesian ideal observer models for understanding sensory processing. We present a new mathematical generalization that will allow these models to be used for deeper investigations into how prior knowledge influences perception. We also provide a software toolkit for implementing the described models.

  • Ideal Observer Models ⋅ Perception ⋅ Bayesian Inference

Footnotes

  • Authors report no conflict of interest

  • TSM: F32 EY03232 & T32 EY007043; EAC: NSF (Award #2041726); BR: Aspire (VRI20-10); JWP: McKnight Scholar’s Award, Simons Collaboration on the Global Brain (SCGB AWD543027) & the NIH BRAIN initiative (R01EB026946)

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

Back to top
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A general framework for inferring Bayesian ideal observer models from psychophysical data
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
A general framework for inferring Bayesian ideal observer models from psychophysical data
Tyler S. Manning, Benjamin N. Naecker, Iona R. McLean, Bas Rokers, Jonathan W. Pillow, Emily A. Cooper
eNeuro 31 October 2022, ENEURO.0144-22.2022; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0144-22.2022

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
A general framework for inferring Bayesian ideal observer models from psychophysical data
Tyler S. Manning, Benjamin N. Naecker, Iona R. McLean, Bas Rokers, Jonathan W. Pillow, Emily A. Cooper
eNeuro 31 October 2022, ENEURO.0144-22.2022; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0144-22.2022
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • Ideal Observer Models ⋅ Perception ⋅ Bayesian Inference

Responses to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Methods/New Tools

  • Superficial Bound of the Depth Limit of Two-Photon Imaging in Mouse Brain
  • A Toolbox of Criteria for Distinguishing Cajal–Retzius Cells from Other Neuronal Types in the Postnatal Mouse Hippocampus
  • Assessment of Spontaneous Neuronal Activity In Vitro Using Multi-Well Multi-Electrode Arrays: Implications for Assay Development
Show more Methods/New Tools

Novel Tools and Methods

  • Superficial Bound of the Depth Limit of Two-Photon Imaging in Mouse Brain
  • A Toolbox of Criteria for Distinguishing Cajal–Retzius Cells from Other Neuronal Types in the Postnatal Mouse Hippocampus
  • Assessment of Spontaneous Neuronal Activity In Vitro Using Multi-Well Multi-Electrode Arrays: Implications for Assay Development
Show more Novel Tools and Methods

Subjects

  • Novel Tools and Methods
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2026 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.