Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro

eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
New Research, Cognition and Behavior

α Phase-Amplitude Tradeoffs Predict Visual Perception

Camille Fakche, Rufin VanRullen, Philippe Marque and Laura Dugué
eNeuro 1 February 2022, ENEURO.0244-21.2022; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0244-21.2022
Camille Fakche
1Université de Paris, INCC Unité Mixte de Recherche 8002, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris F-75006, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Camille Fakche
Rufin VanRullen
2Université de Toulouse, CerCo Unité Mixte de Recherche 5149, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Toulouse F-31059, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Rufin VanRullen
Philippe Marque
3Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, Unité Mixte de Recherche 1214, INSERM Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Toulouse, France
4Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Rangueil, Toulouse, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laura Dugué
1Université de Paris, INCC Unité Mixte de Recherche 8002, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris F-75006, France
5Institut Universitaire de France (IUF), Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Spontaneous α oscillations (∼10 Hz) have been associated with various cognitive functions, including perception. Their phase and amplitude independently predict cortical excitability and subsequent perceptual performance. However, the causal role of α phase-amplitude tradeoffs on visual perception remains ill-defined. We aimed to fill this gap and tested two clear predictions from the pulsed inhibition theory according to which α oscillations are associated with periodic functional inhibition. (1) High-α amplitude induces cortical inhibition at specific phases, associated with low perceptual performance, while at opposite phases, inhibition decreases (potentially increasing excitation) and perceptual performance increases. (2) Low-α amplitude is less susceptible to these phasic (periodic) pulses of inhibition, leading to overall higher perceptual performance. Here, cortical excitability was assessed in humans using phosphene (illusory) perception induced by single pulses of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) applied over visual cortex at perceptual threshold, and its postpulse evoked activity recorded with simultaneous electroencephalography (EEG). We observed that prepulse α phase modulates the probability to perceive a phosphene, predominantly for high-α amplitude, with a nonoptimal phase for phosphene perception between –π/2 and –π/4. The prepulse nonoptimal phase further leads to an increase in postpulse-evoked activity [event-related potential (ERP)], in phosphene-perceived trials specifically. Together, these results show that α oscillations create periodic inhibitory moments when α amplitude is high, leading to periodic decrease of perceptual performance. This study provides strong causal evidence in favor of the pulsed inhibition theory.

Significance Statement

The pulsed inhibition theory predicts that the functional inhibition induced by high-α oscillations’ amplitude is periodic, with specific phases decreasing neural firing and perceptual performance. In turn, low-α oscillations’ amplitude is less susceptible to phasic moments of pulsed inhibition leading to overall higher perceptual performance. Using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with simultaneous electroencephalography (EEG) recordings in humans, we found that specific phases of spontaneous α oscillations (∼10 Hz) decrease cortical excitability and the subsequent perceptual outcomes predominantly when α amplitude is high. Our results provide strong causal evidence in favor of the pulsed inhibition theory.

  • α oscillations
  • cortical excitability
  • EEG
  • phase-amplitude tradeoffs
  • TMS
  • visual perception

Footnotes

  • The authors declare no competing financial interests.

  • This work was supported by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme Grant Agreement No. 852139 (to L.D.), the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)-Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) Programme Grant Agreement No. J18P08ANR00 (to L.D.), and the ANR Programme Grant Agreement No. ANR-19-NEUC-0004 (to R.V.).

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

Back to top
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
α Phase-Amplitude Tradeoffs Predict Visual Perception
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
α Phase-Amplitude Tradeoffs Predict Visual Perception
Camille Fakche, Rufin VanRullen, Philippe Marque, Laura Dugué
eNeuro 1 February 2022, ENEURO.0244-21.2022; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0244-21.2022

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
α Phase-Amplitude Tradeoffs Predict Visual Perception
Camille Fakche, Rufin VanRullen, Philippe Marque, Laura Dugué
eNeuro 1 February 2022, ENEURO.0244-21.2022; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0244-21.2022
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • α oscillations
  • cortical excitability
  • EEG
  • phase-amplitude tradeoffs
  • TMS
  • visual perception

Responses to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

New Research

  • Target-distractor competition modulates saccade trajectories in space and object-space
  • Modulation of visual contrast sensitivity with tRNS across the visual system, evidence from stimulation and simulation
  • Neuronal representation of a working memory-based decision strategy in the motor and prefrontal cortico-basal ganglia loops
Show more New Research

Cognition and Behavior

  • Neuronal representation of a working memory-based decision strategy in the motor and prefrontal cortico-basal ganglia loops
  • Strawberry additive increases nicotine vapor sampling and systemic exposure but does not enhance Pavlovian-based nicotine reward in mice
  • Attention Without Constraint: Alpha Lateralization in Uncued Willed Attention
Show more Cognition and Behavior

Subjects

  • Cognition and Behavior

  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.