Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Confirmation, Sensory and Motor Systems

Rapid Analysis of Visual Receptive Fields by Iterative Tomography

Calvin. D. Eiber, Jin Y. Huang, Spencer C. Chen, Natalie Zeater, Alexander N. J. Pietersen, Dario. A. Protti and Paul R. Martin
eNeuro 19 November 2021, ENEURO.0046-21.2021; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0046-21.2021
Calvin. D. Eiber
1Save Sight Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2000, Australia
2School of Medical Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2000, Australia
3Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Integrative Brain Function, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2000, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Calvin. D. Eiber
Jin Y. Huang
2School of Medical Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2000, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Spencer C. Chen
3Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Integrative Brain Function, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2000, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Natalie Zeater
1Save Sight Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2000, Australia
2School of Medical Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2000, Australia
3Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Integrative Brain Function, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2000, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexander N. J. Pietersen
1Save Sight Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2000, Australia
2School of Medical Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2000, Australia
3Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Integrative Brain Function, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2000, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dario. A. Protti
2School of Medical Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2000, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul R. Martin
1Save Sight Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2000, Australia
2School of Medical Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2000, Australia
3Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Integrative Brain Function, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2000, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Paul R. Martin
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Many receptive fields in the early visual system show standard (center-surround) structure and can be analyzed using simple drifting patterns and a difference-of-Gaussians (DoG) model, which treats the receptive field as a linear filter of the visual image. But many other receptive fields show nonlinear properties such as selectivity for direction of movement. Such receptive fields are typically studied using discrete stimuli (moving or flashed bars and edges) and are modelled according to the features of the visual image to which they are most sensitive. Here, we harness recent advances in tomographic image analysis to characterize rapidly and simultaneously both the linear and nonlinear components of visual receptive fields. Spiking and intracellular voltage potential responses to briefly flashed bars are analyzed using non-negative matrix factorization (NNMF) and iterative reconstruction tomography (IRT). The method yields high-resolution receptive field maps of individual neurons and neuron ensembles in primate (marmoset, both sexes) lateral geniculate and rodent (mouse, male) retina. We show that the first two IRT components correspond to DoG-equivalent center and surround of standard [magnocellular (M) and parvocellular (P)] receptive fields in primate geniculate. The first two IRT components also reveal the spatiotemporal receptive field structure of nonstandard (on/off-rectifying) receptive fields. In rodent retina we combine NNMF-IRT with patch-clamp recording and dye injection to directly map spatial receptive fields to the underlying anatomy of retinal output neurons. We conclude that NNMF-IRT provides a rapid and flexible framework for study of receptive fields in the early visual system.

Significance Statement

We present new means to characterize rapidly the linear and nonlinear properties of receptive fields in early stages of visual processing. We analyze light-evoked response properties using new tomographic methods developed for medical imaging. The tomographic method is rapid, can be used to characterize many cells simultaneously, and reveals detailed structure of receptive field organization in monkey and mouse visual system.

  • lateral geniculate nucleus
  • marmoset
  • receptive field
  • retina
  • sensory coding
  • vision

Footnotes

  • The authors declare no competing financial interests.

  • This work was supported by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Project Grant 1042609, the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Integrative Brain Function Grant CE140100007, and the Australian Research Council Grant DP0988227.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

Back to top
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Rapid Analysis of Visual Receptive Fields by Iterative Tomography
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Rapid Analysis of Visual Receptive Fields by Iterative Tomography
Calvin. D. Eiber, Jin Y. Huang, Spencer C. Chen, Natalie Zeater, Alexander N. J. Pietersen, Dario. A. Protti, Paul R. Martin
eNeuro 19 November 2021, ENEURO.0046-21.2021; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0046-21.2021

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Rapid Analysis of Visual Receptive Fields by Iterative Tomography
Calvin. D. Eiber, Jin Y. Huang, Spencer C. Chen, Natalie Zeater, Alexander N. J. Pietersen, Dario. A. Protti, Paul R. Martin
eNeuro 19 November 2021, ENEURO.0046-21.2021; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0046-21.2021
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • lateral geniculate nucleus
  • marmoset
  • receptive field
  • retina
  • sensory coding
  • vision

Responses to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Confirmation

  • Evaluating the Burstlet Theory of Inspiratory Rhythm and Pattern Generation
  • Sex and Individual Differences in Alcohol Intake Are Associated with Differences in Ketamine Self-Administration Behaviors and Nucleus Accumbens Dendritic Spine Density
  • Developmental Nicotine Exposure Alters Synaptic Input to Hypoglossal Motoneurons and Is Associated with Altered Function of Upper Airway Muscles
Show more Confirmation

Sensory and Motor Systems

  • Independent encoding of orientation and mean luminance by mouse visual cortex
  • Different But Complementary Motor Functions Reveal an Asymmetric Recalibration of Upper Limb Bimanual Coordination
  • Serotonergic Suppression of Sustained Synaptic Responses in Rat Oculomotor Neural Integrator Networks
Show more Sensory and Motor Systems

Subjects

  • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2026 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.